2.3 Production Possibility Model

Just as individuals cannot have everything they want and must instead make choices, society as a whole cannot have everything it might want, either. This section of the chapter will explain the constraints society faces, using a model called the Production Possibilities Frontier (PPF).

In perspective

Pineapple” by Twitter Emoji, CC BY 4.0.

You are stranded on a tropical island alone. On this island, there are only two foods: pineapples and crabs.

In other words, you face a trade-off: any time you spend harvesting pineapples is time that cannot be spent looking for crabs. You are forced to make a decision on how to allocate the scarce resource of time.



While this is an extreme example, it is reflective of a common problem in production. Since there are only a certain number of hours in the day, time is a scarce resource. This scarcity limits the amount of total production.


A T chart showing the list of possibilities on the left and the values for P and C on the right: A - 0, 15 B- 10, 12 C-20, 8 D- 30, 0
Fig 2.2 – By Fanshawe College, CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0

Figure 2.2 displays a table showing several different combinations of goods that can be harvested in a given week. The table is very logical – if you spend all your time catching crabs, you will have no pineapples. Notice that you can produce either all crabs, all pineapples, or a mix of the two.

Assume you choose to only catch crabs. How many would have to be given up in order to obtain ten pineapples? In this example, three. This is an important concept; even though our scarce resource is time, we can measure the cost of a good, in this case, pineapples, in terms of the foregone good, in this cases crabs.

This concept is called the Marginal (Opportunity) Cost of an action. In this case, since you have to give up three crabs to produce 10 pineapples, the marginal cost for one pineapple is 3/10 of a crab.

Notice how the marginal cost changes as you harvest more pineapples. To produce the next ten pineapples, it costs four crabs, and the next ten costs eight. Now there are no more crabs to give up. While marginal opportunity cost is not always increasing, it is intuitive to think that the more pineapples you pick, the harder they will be to find, and therefore the more time you will have to give up to harvest 10 more.

While much useful analysis can be conducted with a chart, it is often useful to represent our models graphically. A Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) is the graphical representation of Figure 2.2. It represents the maximum combination of goods that can be produced given available resources and technology. Each point represents one of the combinations from Figure 2.2.

In our example, while we would love to produce 30 pineapples and 30 crabs, this is out of our realm of possible production. In other words, it is not a point on our PPF.

A Production Possibility Frontier (PPF)
Fig 2.3 – By Fanshawe College, CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0

Using our terminology from before, each point along our PPF (i.e. Point A) is efficient (in a one-person world) since there is no way to get more pineapples without giving up some crabs and vice-versa. If we are inside the PPF (i.e. Point B), we are not fully using our resources. In this case, we can produce more pineapples without having to give up any more crabs. This point is inefficient. Points outside the PPF (i.e. Point C), while preferable, are unattainable given constraints in resources and time.

PPF and Increasing Opportunity Cost

Using our analysis of Marginal Cost (MC) from before, we see that the Slope (absolute value) of the PPF is the amount of the good on the vertical axis given up to obtain additional units of the good on the horizontal axis. Recall that slope is calculated using rise overrun. From Fig 2.2, we see that to gain 10 additional pineapples (from 10 to 20 units), we give up 4 crabs (12 to 8 units). To obtain another 10 units of pineapples (from 20 to 30 units), we give up 8 crabs (8 to 0 units). As we move down the PPF, the slope and MC increase. This pattern is common enough that economists have given it a name: the law of increasing opportunity cost.

Definition: law of increasing opportunity cost

The law of increasing opportunity cost – which holds that as the production of a good or service increases, the marginal opportunity cost of producing it increases as well.

This happens because some resources are better suited for producing certain goods and services instead of others. When the producer wants to obtain more pineapples and devotes more resources (time and effort) to it, there will be fewer resources available for obtaining the other goods, crab. Therefore, more pineapples result in the greater sacrifice of crabs.

Our government spends a certain amount of funds on reducing crime. However, additional increases typically cause relatively larger increases in the opportunity cost of reducing crime, and paying for enough police and security to reduce crime to nothing at all would be a tremendously high opportunity cost.

The curvature of the production possibilities frontier shows that as we add more resources to pineapples, moving from left to right along the horizontal axis, the original increase in opportunity cost is fairly small, but gradually increases. In this way, the law of increasing opportunity cost produces the outward-bending shape of the production possibilities frontier.


2.2 Production Possibility Frontier” in Principles of Microeconomics by Dr. Emma Hutchinson, University of Victoria is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.



Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Principles of Microeconomics Copyright © 2022 by Sharmistha Nag is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book