3.7 Joint Probabilities

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

  • Calculate joint probabilities.

A joint probability is the probability of events [latex]A[/latex] and [latex]B[/latex] happening at the same time.  We are interested in both events occurring simultaneously in the unrestricted sample space.  We have seen these types of probabilities already when we looked at contingency tables and in the context of “or” probabilities.

EXAMPLE

Suppose a study of speeding violations and drivers who use cell phones produced the following fictional data:

Speeding violation in the last year No speeding violation in the last year Total
Cell phone user 25 280 305
Not a cell phone user 45 405 450
Total 70 685 755
  1. What is the probability that a randomly selected person is a cell phone user and had no speeding violations in the last year?
  2. What is the probability that a randomly selected person had a speeding violation in the last year and does not use a cell phone?

Solution:

  1. [latex]\displaystyle{\mbox{Probability}=\frac{\mbox{number of cell phone users and no violations}}{\mbox{total number in study}}=\frac{280}{755}}[/latex]
  2. [latex]\displaystyle{\mbox{Probability}=\frac{\mbox{number of violations and not cell phone users}}{\mbox{total number in study}}=\frac{45}{755}}[/latex]

NOTE

These two probabilities are examples of joint probabilities.   For example, in part 1, we want to find the probability that a randomly selected person has both traits:  cell phone user and no speeding violations.  So, we are interested in both events happening at the same time.

Repeated Trial Experiments

So far, most of the probabilities we have looked at are based on a single trial experiment and finding a probability based on that single trial.  For example, finding the probability of rolling an even number in a single roll of a die is single trial experiment—we are only rolling the die one time and then we want to find the probability of a particular event happening in that single roll.  Even the joint probabilities that we have seen so far, as in the example above, are based on a single trial experiment.  We see these types of joint probabilities when we randomly select a single item and then want to find the probability that the item has two different characteristics at the same time.

However, we often want to calculate probabilities associated with repeated trial experiments.  In a repeated trial experiment, we deal with identical trials that are repeated a number of times.  For example, flipping a coin three times is an example of a repeated trial experiment—the trial is flipping the coin and then that trial is repeated three identical times.

EXAMPLE

Which of the following are repeated trial experiments?  For the repeated trial experiments, identify the trial and the number of repetitions.

  1. Finding the probability of rolling an odd number in the roll of die.
  2. Finding the probability of drawing five spades from a deck of cards.
  3. Finding the probability a randomly selected person has blue eyes and blond hair.
  4. Finding the probability that three women from a pool of candidates are selected for a committee.
  5. Finding the probability that a student answers ten multiple choice questions correctly.

Solution:

  1. Single trial experiment.  The die is rolled one time.
  2. Repeated trial experiment.  The trial is selecting a card from the deck and this trial is repeated five times.
  3. Single trial experiment.  A single person is selected.
  4. Repeated trial experiment.  The trial is selecting a women from the candidate pool and this trial is repeated three times.
  5. Repeated trial experiment.  The trial is answering an individual question and this trial is repeated ten times.

We can think of repeated trial experiments as joint probabilities—event on trial one AND event on trial two AND event on trial three and so on, depending on the number of trials.  Suppose in the example of flipping the coin three times we want to find the probability of getting three heads in the three flips.  We can think of this as a joint probability—heads on flip one AND heads on flip two AND heads on flip three.  We want to calculate probabilities for such repeated trial experiments and, as we will see, the key to such probabilities is to think of the repeated trials as a joint probability.

One thing we must consider in a repeated trial experiment is whether the trials are done with or without replacement because this changes how we calculate the probability as we move from trial to trial.

  • With replacement.  Each member of a population is replaced after it is selected on a trial, and so each member of the population has the possibility of being chosen more than once (on different trials of the experiment).  In terms of probability, with replacement means that the probability a member of the population is chosen stays the same from trial to trial.  In other words, the trials are independent events because the result of the first trial does not affect the result of the second trial.
  • Without replacement.  Each time a member of a population is selected, it is NOT replaced, and so each member of the population cannot be chosen more than once.  In terms of probability, without replacement means that the probability a member of the population is chosen changes from trial to trial.  In other words, the trials are dependent events because the result of the first trial does affect the result of the second trial.

When calculating probabilities for repeated trial experiments, it is important that we identify if the experiment is done with or without replacement.  Sometimes we will be told directly that the experiment is done with or without replacement.  But most of the time we will need to determine if the experiment is done with or without replacement from the context of the question.

EXAMPLE

For each of the following determine if the experiment is done with or without replacement.

  1. Flipping a coin three times.
  2. Selecting three women for a committee from a pool of candidates.
  3. Drawing five cards from deck of cards.
  4. Rolling a die six times.
  5. Selecting the members of the student executive committee from the student council.

Solution:

  1. With replacement.  The probability of heads or tails stays the same with each flip.
  2. Without replacement.  In this case, we want three different women on the committee, so we must select them without replacement.  (Selecting with replacement would mean a possibility of the same women being selected three times and then the committee would consist of just a single person).
  3. Depending on the context, this could be with or without replacement.  If each card is replaced after it is selected, this would be with replacement.  If each card is not replaced after it is selected, this would be without replacement.  In this situation, the question would probably include a statement about whether the cards are drawn with or without replacement.
  4. With replacement.  The probability of rolling any of the numbers stays the same with each roll of the die.
  5. Without replacement.  In this case, we want the members of the executive committee to be all different, so we must select them without replacement.

The Multiplication Rule for Joint Probabilities

In mathematical terms, “and” means multiply.  By thinking of a repeated trial experiment as a joint probability, the basic idea is to multiply the probabilities of the individual trials.  Basically, if we think of a repeated trial experiment as a joint probability—event on trial one AND event on trial two AND event on trial three and so on, depending on the number of trials—we can find the probability by multiplying together the probabilities of the trials:

[latex]\displaystyle{\mbox{Probability}=\mbox{Prob. on Trial 1} \times \mbox{Prob. on Trial 2} \times \mbox{Prob. on Trial 3} \times \cdots}[/latex]

Unfortunately, it is more complicated than that because we have to work out the probabilities on each trial, and these probabilities are affected by whether the experiment is done with or without replacement.

The multiplication rule to find the probability of [latex]A[/latex] and [latex]B[/latex] in a repeated trial experiment is

[latex]\displaystyle{P(A \mbox{ and }B)=P(A) \times P(B|A)}[/latex]

If we think of [latex]A[/latex] as the first trial and [latex]B[/latex] as the second trial, the probability of [latex]A[/latex] and [latex]B[/latex] is the probability of [latex]A[/latex] (the probability of [latex]A[/latex] on the first trial) times the probability of [latex]B[/latex] given [latex]A[/latex] (the probability of [latex]B[/latex] on the second trial assuming that [latex]A[/latex] happened on the first trial).

In the case that the experiment is done with replacement, the events [latex]A[/latex] and [latex]B[/latex] are independent, so [latex]P(B|A)=P(B)[/latex] and this rule becomes

[latex]\displaystyle{P(A \mbox{ and }B)=P(A) \times P(B)}[/latex]

We can extend this rule to any number of trials, we just need to keep multiplying as we move from trial to trial.

When finding probabilities associated with repeated trial experiments, remember the following:

  • To find the probability we work with the probabilities of the individual trials, multiplying the probabilities together as we move from trial to trial.
  • Identify if the experiment is done with or without replacement and use that information to find the probability on each subsequent trial.

EXAMPLE

A small local high school has 25 students in its graduating class.  18 of the students are going to college next year and the remaining 7 are not going to college next year.  Suppose two students are selected at random from the graduating class.

  1. What is the probability that both students are going to college next year?
  2. What is the probability that exactly one of the students is going to college next year?

Solution:

This is a repeated trial experiment.  A trial is selecting a student and there are two trials.  The assumption here is that the experiment is done without replacement because we do not want to get the same student twice.

  1. We want to get college-bound students on both trials.  In other words, college-bound student on trial one AND college-bound student on trial two.  On the first trial, the probability of getting a college-bound student is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{18}{25}}[/latex].  We are selecting without replacement, so after the first trial we assume that we have removed one of the college-bound students.  This means that on the second trial, there are only 24 students to pick from (one student was removed on the first trial) and there are only 17 college-bound students left (on the first trial we removed one of the 18 college-bound students).  So on the second trial, the probability of getting a college-bound student is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{17}{24}}[/latex].  The probability of getting two college-bound students is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*}  \\ \mbox{Probability} & = & \frac{18}{25} \times \frac{17}{24}=0.51 \\ \\ \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

  2. We want one college-bound student (denoted [latex]C[/latex]) and one non college-bound student (denoted [latex]N[/latex]).  In this case, we have to think about the order of the selections—there is a difference between college-bound on trial one, non-college bound on trial two([latex]CN[/latex]) and non-college bound on trial one, college bound on trial two ([latex]NC[/latex]).  All possible orders must be accounted for when we calculate the probability.  One of the two possible orders must occur:  [latex]CN[/latex] OR [latex]NC[/latex].  For each of the individual orders, we multiply the probabilities as we move from trial to trial.  The “or” means that we add the probabilities of the different orders.  In other words:

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*}\\\mbox{Probability}&=&\mbox{Probability of }CN+\mbox{Probability of }NC\\\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

    For the [latex]CN[/latex] order (college-bound on trial one, non college-bound on trial two), we want a college-bound student on trial one and the probability of getting a college-bound student is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{18}{25}}[/latex].  We are selecting without replacement, so after the first trial we assume that we have removed one of the college-bound students.  This means that on the second trial, there are only 24 students to pick from (a college-bound student was removed on the first trial) and there are 7 non college-bound students (none of the non college-bound students were removed after the first trial).  So on the second trial, the probability of getting a non college-bound student is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{7}{24}}[/latex]. So the probability of getting the [latex]CN[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{18}{25} \times \frac{7}{24}}[/latex].

    Similarly for the [latex]NC[/latex] order (non college-bound on trial one, college-bound on trial two), we want a non college-bound student on trial one and the probability of getting a non college-bound student is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{7}{25}}[/latex].  We are selecting without replacement, so after the first trial we assume that we have removed one of the non college-bound students.  This means that on the second trial, there are only 24 students to pick from (a non college-bound student was removed on the first trial) and there are 18 college-bound students (none of the college-bound students were removed after the first trial).  So on the second trial, the probability of getting a college-bound student is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{18}{24}}[/latex]. So the probability of getting the [latex]NC[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{7}{25} \times \frac{18}{24}}[/latex].

    The probability of getting exactly one college bound student is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*}\mbox{Probability}&=&\mbox{Probability of }CN+\mbox{Probability of }NC\\&=&\left(\frac{18}{25}\times\frac{7}{24}\right)+\left(\frac{7}{24}\times\frac{18}{25}\right)\\&=&0.42\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

EXAMPLE

Suppose a fair die is rolled two times.

  1. What is the probability of getting two 5’s?
  2. What is the probability of getting exactly one 2 and one 6 in the two rolls?

Solution:

This is a repeated trial experiment.  A trial is rolling a die and there are two trials.  The trials are independent (what happens on the first roll does not affect what happens on the second roll).

  1. We want to get a 5 on both rolls.  In other words, a 5 on roll one AND a 5 on roll two.  On the first roll, the probability of getting a 5 is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{1}{6}}[/latex].  On the second roll, the probability of getting a 5 is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{1}{6}}[/latex].  Because the rolls are independent, the probability of getting a 5 on the second roll is not affected by what happens on the first roll.  The probability of getting two 5’s is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*}\\\mbox{Probability}&=&\frac{1}{6}\times\frac{1}{6}=\frac{1}{36}\\\\\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

  2. We want one 2 and one 6. In this case, we have to think about the order of the rolls—there is a difference between 2 on roll one, 6 on roll two and 6 on roll one, 2 on roll two.  All possible orders must be accounted for when we calculate the probability. One of the two possible orders must occur:  [latex]26[/latex] OR [latex]62[/latex].  For of the individual orders, we multiply the probabilities as we move from trial to trial.  The “or” means that we add the probabilities of the different orders.  In other words,

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*} \\ \mbox{Probability} & = & \mbox{Probability of }26+\mbox{Probability of }62\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

    For the [latex]26[/latex] order (2 on roll one, 6 on roll two), the probability of getting a 2 on roll one is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{1}{6}}[/latex] and the probability of getting a 6 on roll two is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{1}{6}}[/latex]. So the probability of getting the [latex]26[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{1}{6} \times \frac{1}{6}}[/latex].

    Similarly for the [latex]62[/latex] order (6 on roll one, 2 on roll two), the probability of getting a 6 on roll one is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{1}{6}}[/latex] and the probability of getting a 2 on roll two is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{1}{6}}[/latex].  So the probability of getting the [latex]62[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{1}{6} \times \frac{1}{6}}[/latex].

    The probability of getting exactly one 2 and one 6 is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*}\mbox{Probability}&=&\mbox{Probability of }26+\mbox{Probability of }62\\&=&\left(\frac{1}{6}\times\frac{1}{6}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{6}\times\frac{1}{6}\right)\\&=&\frac{1}{18}\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

TRY IT

A box of contains 30 microchips and 9 of those microchips are defective.  Suppose two microchips are selected randomly from the box for inspection by the quality control officer.

  1. What is the probability that both microchips are defective?
  2. What is the probability that exactly one of the microchips is defective?
Click to see Solution
  1. [latex]\displaystyle{\mbox{Probability}=\frac{9}{30} \times \frac{8}{29}=0.0828}[/latex]
  2. [latex]\displaystyle{\mbox{Probability}=\left(\frac{9}{30} \times \frac{21}{29} \right)+\left(\frac{21}{30} \times \frac{9}{29}\right)=0.4345}[/latex]

EXAMPLE

A box contains 5 red cards and 12 white cards.  Suppose three cards are drawn at random from the box without replacement.

  1. What is the probability that all three cards are white?
  2. What is the probability that exactly one of the cards is red?
  3. What is the probability that at least one card is red?
  4. What is the probability that at most one card is white?

Solution:

This is a repeated trial experiment.  A trial is selecting a card and there are three trials.  There are 17 cards in the box.

  1. We want to get a white card on all three draws.  In other words, white on draw one AND white on draw two AND white on draw three.  On the first draw, the probability of getting a white card is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{12}{17}}[/latex].  We are selecting without replacement, so after the first draw we assume that we removed a white card from the box.  This means that on the second draw, there are only 16 cards left in the box (one card was removed on the first draw) and there are only 11 white cards left (on the first draw we removed one of the 12 white cards).  So on the second draw, the probability of getting a white card is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{11}{16}}[/latex].  After the second draw we assume that we removed white cards from the box on draws one and two.  This means that on the third draw, there are only 15 cards left in the box (two cards were removed on the first two draws) and there are only 10 white cards left (white cards were removed on draws one and two).  So on the third draw, the probability of getting a white card is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{10}{15}}[/latex]. The probability of getting three white cards is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*}\\\mbox{Probability}&=&\frac{12}{17}\times\frac{11}{16}\times\frac{10}{15}=0.3235\\\\\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

  2. We want one red card ([latex]R[/latex]), so the other two cards must be white ([latex]W[/latex]).  In this case, we have to think about the order of the selection.  All possible orders must be accounted for when we calculate the probability.  One of three possible orders must occur:  [latex]RWW[/latex] OR [latex]WRW[/latex] OR [latex]WWR[/latex].  For each of the individual orders, we multiply the probabilities as we move from draw to draw.  The “or” means that we add the probabilities of the different orders.  In other words,

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*} \\ \mbox{Probability} & = & P(RWW)+P(WRW)+P(WWR)\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

    For the [latex]RWW[/latex] order, the probability of red on draw one is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{5}{17}}[/latex].  We are selecting without replacement, so after the first trial we assume that we have removed one of the red cards. This means that on the second draw, there are only 16 cards left in the box (one card was removed on the first draw) and all 12 white cards are left (on the first draw we removed a red card).  So on the second draw, the probability of getting a white card is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{12}{16}}[/latex].  After the second draw we assume that we removed a red card on draw one and a white card on draw two.  This means that on the third draw, there are only 15 cards left in the box (two cards were removed on the first two draws) and there are only 11 white cards left (one white card was removed on draw two).  So on the third draw, the probability of getting a white card is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{11}{15}}[/latex].  So the probability of getting the [latex]RWW[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{5}{17} \times \frac{12}{16} \times \frac{11}{15}}[/latex].

    Using similar logic, the probability of getting the [latex]WRW[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{12}{17} \times \frac{5}{16}\times\frac{11}{15}}[/latex] and the probability of getting the [latex]WWR[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{12}{17} \times \frac{11}{16} \times \frac{5}{15}}[/latex].

    The probability of getting exactly one red card is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*} \mbox{Probability} & = & P(RWW)+P(WRW) +P(WWR) \\ & = & \left(\frac{5}{17} \times \frac{12}{16} \times \frac{11}{15}\right)+\left(\frac{12}{17} \times \frac{5}{16} \times \frac{11}{15} \right)+\left(\frac{12}{17} \times \frac{11}{16} \times \frac{5}{15} \right) \\ & = & 0.4853 \\ \\ \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

  3. We want at least one red card in the three draws.  This means we can have exactly one red card or exactly two red cards or exactly three red cards.  As before, we have to think about the order of the selection.  All possible orders must be accounted for when we calculate the probability.  Here, there are seven possible ways of getting at least one red card:  [latex]RWW[/latex] OR [latex]WRW[/latex] OR [latex]WWR[/latex] OR [latex]RRW[/latex] OR [latex]RWR[/latex] OR [latex]RRW[/latex] OR [latex]RRR[/latex].  Of course, we could work out the probabilities of each of these orders and add them all up.  But there is a faster way to find this probability—use the complement.  The complement of “at least one red card” is “exactly zero red cards.”  When we look at the seven possible orders that make up the “at least one red card” event, the complement consists of all of the missing orders.  In this case there is only one missing order, [latex]WWW[/latex], which is the event “exactly zero red cards.”  Using the complement, the probability of at least one red card is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*}\\P(\mbox{at least one red card})&=&1-P(\mbox{exactly zero red card})\\&=&1-P(WWW)\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

    In part 1 of this question, we found the probability of [latex]WWW[/latex]:  [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{12}{17}\times\frac{11}{16}\times\frac{10}{15}}[/latex].  So the probability of at least one red card is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*}P(\mbox{at least one red card})&=& 1-P(WWW)\\&=&1-\left(\frac{12}{17}\times\frac{11}{16}\times\frac{10}{15}\right)\\&=& 0.6765\\\\\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

  4. We want at most one white card in the three draws.  This means we can have exactly zero white cards or exactly one white card.  As before, we have to think about the order of the selection.  All possible orders must be accounted for when we calculate the probability.  Here, there are four possible ways of getting at most one white card:  [latex]RRR[/latex] OR [latex]RRW[/latex] OR [latex]RWR[/latex] OR [latex]WRR[/latex].  Using similar logic to above, the probability of getting the [latex]RRR[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{5}{17} \times \frac{4}{16}\times \frac{3}{15}}[/latex],  the probability of getting the [latex]RRW[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{5}{17} \times \frac{4}{16}\times\frac{12}{15}}[/latex],the probability of getting the [latex]RWR[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{5}{17} \times \frac{12}{16}\times\frac{5}{15}}[/latex], and the probability of getting the [latex]WRR[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{\frac{12}{17} \times \frac{5}{16}\times\frac{4}{15}}[/latex].  The probability of getting at most one white card is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*}\\\mbox{Probability}&=&P(RRR)+P(RRW)+P(RWR)+P(WRR)\\&=&\left(\frac{5}{17}\times\frac{4}{16}\times\frac{3}{15}\right)+\left(\frac{5}{17}\times\frac{4}{16}\times\frac{12}{15}\right)+\left(\frac{5}{17}\times\frac{12}{16}\times\frac{4}{15}\right)\\&&+\left(\frac{12}{17}\times\frac{5}{16}\times\frac{4}{15}\right)\\&=& 0.1912\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

TRY IT

A box contains 5 red cards and 12 white cards.  Suppose three cards are drawn at random from the box with replacement.

  1. What is the probability that all three cards are white?
  2. What is the probability that exactly one of the cards is red?
  3. What is the probability that at least one card is red?
  4. What is the probability that at most one card is white?
Click to see Solution
  1. [latex]\displaystyle{\mbox{Probability}=\frac{12}{17} \times \frac{12}{17}\times \frac{12}{17}=0.3517}[/latex]
  2. [latex]\displaystyle{\mbox{Probability}=\left(\frac{5}{17} \times \frac{12}{17} \times \frac{12}{17} \right)+\left(\frac{5}{17} \times \frac{12}{17} \times \frac{12}{17} \right)+\left(\frac{5}{17} \times \frac{12}{17} \times \frac{12}{17} \right)=0.4397}[/latex]
  3. [latex]\displaystyle{\mbox{Probability}=1-\left(\frac{12}{17} \times \frac{12}{17}\times \frac{12}{17}\right)=0.6483}[/latex]
  4. [latex]\displaystyle{\mbox{Probability}=\left(\frac{5}{17} \times \frac{5}{17} \times \frac{5}{17} \right)+\left(\frac{5}{17} \times \frac{5}{17} \times \frac{12}{17} \right)+\left(\frac{5}{17} \times \frac{12}{17} \times \frac{5}{17} \right)+\left(\frac{12}{17} \times \frac{5}{17} \times \frac{5}{17} \right)=0.2086}[/latex]

EXAMPLE

A company produces a popular brand of sports drink.  The company is currently running a contest where winning symbols are placed under the bottle caps.  7% of all the bottle caps contain winning symbols.  You buy three bottles of the sports drink.

  1. What is the probability that all bottles have winning symbols?
  2. What is the probability that exactly one of the bottles has a winning symbol?
  3. What is the probability that at least one bottle has a winning symbol?

Solution:

This is a repeated trial experiment.  A trial is selecting a bottle and there are three trials.  This is an experiment without replacement (you do not want to select the same bottle three times).  However, because the population of bottles is very, very large, we can treat the experiment as if the selections are made with replace.  This means that we can treat the selection of the bottles as independent and so the probability of getting a winning bottle will be 7% on every draw.

  1. We want to get a winning symbol on all three bottles.  In other words, win on bottle one AND win on bottle two AND win on bottle three.  The probability of winning on the first bottle is 7%, the probability of winning on the second bottle is 7%, and the probability of winning on the third bottle is 7%.  Because we can treat the selections as independent, the probability of winning does not change from draw to draw.  The probability of getting three winning bottles is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*}\\\mbox{Probability}&=& 0.07\times 0.07\times 0.07=0.0003\\\\\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

  2. We want one winning bottle ([latex]W[/latex]), so the other two bottles must be non-winners ([latex]N[/latex]).  The probability of winning on any bottle is 7%, so the probability of losing on any bottle is 93%.  In this case, we have to think about the order of the selection.  All possible orders must be accounted for when we calculate the probability.  One of the three possible orders must occur:  [latex]WNN[/latex] OR [latex]NWN[/latex] OR [latex]NNW[/latex].  For each of the individual orders, we multiply the probabilities as we move from draw to draw.  The “or” means that we add the probabilities of the different orders.  In other words,

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*} \\ \mbox{Probability} & = & P(WNN)+P(NWN)+P(NNW)\\ \\ \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

    For the [latex]WNN[/latex] order (win on bottle one, non-wins on bottles two and three), the probability of getting a win on bottle one is [latex]0.07[/latex] and the probability of getting a non-win on bottle two or bottle three is [latex]0.93[/latex]. So the probability of getting the [latex]WNN[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{0.07 \times 0.93 \times 0.93}[/latex].Using similar logic, the probability of getting the [latex]NWN[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{0.93 \times 0.07\times 0.93}[/latex] and the probability of getting the [latex]NNW[/latex] order is [latex]\displaystyle{0.93 \times 0.93 \times 0.07}[/latex].

    The probability of getting exactly one winning bottle is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*} \mbox{Probability} & = & P(WNN)+P(NWN) +P(NNW) \\ & = & \left(0.07 \times 0.93 \times 0.93 \right)+\left(0.93 \times 0.07 \times 0.93 \right)+\left(0.93 \times 0.93 \times 0.07 \right) \\ & = & 0.1816\\ \\ \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

  3. We want at least one winning bottle.  This means we can have exactly one winning bottle or exactly two winning bottles or exactly three winning bottles.  Of course, we could work out the probabilities of each of these orders and add them all up.  But the a faster way to find this probability is to use the complement.  The complement of “at least one winning bottle” is “exactly zero winning bottles”  The “exactly zero winning bottle” is the case [latex]NNN[/latex] (all three bottles are non-winners).  Using the complement, the probability of at least one winning bottle is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*} \\ P(\mbox{at least one winner}) & = & 1-P(\mbox{exactly zero winners}) \\ & = & 1-P(NNN)\\ \\ \end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

    The probability of zero winning bottles ([latex]NNN[/latex]) is :  [latex]\displaystyle{0.93 \times 0.93 \times 0.93}[/latex].  So the probability of at least one winning bottle is

    [latex]\begin{eqnarray*}P(\mbox{at least one winner})&=&1-P(NNN)\\&=&1-\left(0.93\times0.93\times0.93\right)\\&=&0.1956\\\\\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

NOTE

In situations like this example where we are drawing with replacement from a very, very large population, we treat the draws as if they are independent.  Because the population is so large, the change in the probability as we go from draw to draw is very, very small, which makes it hardly detectable in the calculation of the answer.  In such situations, we can treat the draws as independent.  We cannot do this when we are drawing without replacement from a small population (as in the red and white card example above) because there are distinct changes in the probabilities as we move from draw to draw.


Concept Review

In a repeated trial experiment, we deal with identical trials that are repeated a number of times.  A repeated trial experiment can be thought of as a joint probability.  The multiplication rule for joint probabilities is [latex]\displaystyle{P(A \mbox{ and }B)=P(A) \times P(B|A)}[/latex] where [latex]A[/latex] is the event on the first trial and [latex]B[/latex] is the event on the second trial.  In sampling with replacement each member of a population is replaced after it is picked, so that member has the possibility of being chosen more than once, and the events are considered to be independent.  In sampling without replacement, each member of a population may be chosen only once, and the events are considered to be dependent.


Attribution

“3.1 Terminology”, “3.2 Independent and Mutually Exclusive Events”“3.3 Two Basic Rule of Probability”, and 3.4 Contingency Tables in Introductory Statistics by OpenStax is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Introduction to Statistics Copyright © 2022 by Valerie Watts is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.