1.6 The Real Numbers

Learning Objectives

By the end of this section, you will be able to:

  • Simplify expressions with square roots
  • Identify integers, rational numbers, irrational numbers, and real numbers
  • Locate fractions on the number line
  • Locate decimals on the number line

Simplify Expressions with Square Roots

Remember that when a number [latex]n[/latex] is multiplied by itself, we write [latex]{n}^{2}[/latex] and read it “n squared.” The result is called the square of [latex]n[/latex]. For example,

[latex]8^2[/latex] read [latex]\text{8 squared}[/latex]

[latex]64[/latex] is called the square of [latex]8[/latex]

Similarly, 121 is the square of 11, because [latex]{11}^{2}[/latex] is 121.

Square of a Number

If [latex]{n}^{2}=m,[/latex] then [latex]m[/latex] is the square of [latex]n[/latex].

Complete the following table to show the squares of the counting numbers 1 through 15.

Number [latex]n[/latex] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Square [latex]n^2[/latex] 64 121

The numbers in the second row are called perfect square numbers. It will be helpful to learn to recognize the perfect square numbers.

The squares of the counting numbers are positive numbers. What about the squares of negative numbers? We know that when the signs of two numbers are the same, their product is positive. So the square of any negative number is also positive.

[latex]\begin{array}{cccccccccc}{\left(-3\right)}^{2}=9\hfill & & & {\left(-8\right)}^{2}=64\hfill & & & {\left(-11\right)}^{2}=121\hfill & & & {\left(-15\right)}^{2}=225\hfill \end{array}[/latex]

Did you notice that these squares are the same as the squares of the positive numbers?

Sometimes we will need to look at the relationship between numbers and their squares in reverse. Because [latex]{10}^{2}=100[/latex], we say 100 is the square of 10. We also say that 10 is a square root of 100. A number whose square is [latex]m[/latex] is called a square root of [latex]m[/latex].

Square Root of a Number

If [latex]{n}^{2}=m[/latex], then [latex]n[/latex] is a square root of [latex]m[/latex].

Notice [latex]{\left(-10\right)}^{2}=100[/latex] also, so [latex]-10[/latex] is also a square root of 100. Therefore, both [latex]10[/latex] and [latex]-10[/latex] are square roots of 100.

So, every positive number has two square roots—one positive and one negative. What if we only wanted the positive square root of a positive number? The radical sign, [latex]\sqrt{m}[/latex], denotes the positive square root. The positive square root is called the principal square root. When we use the radical sign that always means we want the principal square root.

We also use the radical sign for the square root of zero. Because [latex]{0}^{2}=0,[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{0}=0[/latex]. Notice that zero has only one square root.

Square Root Notation

[latex]\sqrt{m}[/latex] is read “the square root of [latex]m[/latex]”

[latex]radical\;sign\rightarrow\sqrt m\leftarrow radicand[/latex]

If [latex]m={n}^{2}[/latex], then [latex]\sqrt{m}=n[/latex], for [latex]n\ge 0[/latex].

The square root of [latex]m[/latex], [latex]\sqrt{m}[/latex], is the positive number whose square is [latex]m[/latex].

Since 10 is the principal square root of 100, we write [latex]\sqrt{100}=10[/latex]. You may want to complete the following table to help you recognize square roots.

[latex]\sqrt1[/latex] [latex]\sqrt4[/latex] [latex]\sqrt9[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{16}[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{25}[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{36}[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{49}[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{64}[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{81}[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{100}[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{121}[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{144}[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{169}[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{196}[/latex] [latex]\sqrt{225}[/latex]
10

Try It

Simplify:

1) [latex]\sqrt{25}[/latex]
2) [latex]\sqrt{121}[/latex]

Solution

1) Since [latex]{5}^{2}=25[/latex]
[latex]\begin{array}{c}\sqrt{25}=5\end{array}[/latex]

2)Since [latex]{11}^{2}=121[/latex]
[latex]\begin{array}{c}\sqrt{121}=11\end{array}[/latex]

Try It

Simplify:

3) [latex]\sqrt{36}[/latex]
4) [latex]\sqrt{169}[/latex]

Solution

3) [latex]6[/latex]
4) [latex]13[/latex]

Try It

Simplify:

5) [latex]\sqrt{16}[/latex]
6) [latex]\sqrt{196}[/latex]

Solution

5) [latex]4[/latex]
6) [latex]14[/latex]

We know that every positive number has two square roots and the radical sign indicates the positive one. We write [latex]\sqrt{100}=10[/latex]. If we want to find the negative square root of a number, we place a negative in front of the radical sign. For example, [latex]-\sqrt{100}=-10[/latex]. We read [latex]-\sqrt{100}[/latex] as “the opposite of the square root of 10.”

Try It

Simplify:

7) [latex]-\sqrt{9}[/latex]
8) [latex]-\sqrt{144}[/latex]

Solution

7) The negative is in front of the radical sign. [latex]\begin{array}{c}-\sqrt{9}=-3\end{array}[/latex]

8) The negative is in front of the radical sign. [latex]\begin{array}{c}-\sqrt{144}=-12\end{array}[/latex]

Try It

Simplify:

9) [latex]-\sqrt{4}[/latex]
10) [latex]-\sqrt{225}[/latex]

Solution

9) [latex]-2[/latex]
10) [latex]-15[/latex]

Try It

Simplify:

11) [latex]-\sqrt{81}[/latex]
12) [latex]-\sqrt{100}[/latex]

Solution

11) [latex]-9[/latex]
12) [latex]-10[/latex]

Identify Integers, Rational Numbers, Irrational Numbers, and Real Numbers

We have already described numbers as counting numbers, whole numbers, and integers. What is the difference between these types of numbers?

[latex]\begin{array}{cccccc}\text{Counting numbers}\hfill & & & & & 1,2,3,4,\text{…}\hfill \\ \text{Whole numbers}\hfill & & & & & 0,1,2,3,4,\text{…}\hfill \\ \text{Integers}\hfill & & & & & \text{…}-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,\text{…}\hfill \end{array}[/latex]

What type of numbers would we get if we started with all the integers and then included all the fractions? The numbers we would have form the set of rational numbers. A rational number is a number that can be written as a ratio of two integers.

Rational Number

A rational number is a number of the form [latex]\frac{p}{q}[/latex], where [latex]p[/latex] and [latex]q[/latex] are integers and [latex]q\ne 0[/latex].

A rational number can be written as the ratio of two integers.

All signed fractions, such as [latex]\frac{4}{5},-\frac{7}{8},\frac{13}{4},-\frac{20}{3}[/latex] are rational numbers. Each numerator and each denominator is an integer.

Are integers rational numbers? To decide if an integer is a rational number, we try to write it as a ratio of two integers. Each integer can be written as a ratio of integers in many ways. For example, 3 is equivalent to [latex]\frac{3}{1},\frac{6}{2},\frac{9}{3},\frac{12}{4},\frac{15}{5}\text{…}[/latex]

An easy way to write an integer as a ratio of integers is to write it as a fraction with denominator one.

[latex]\begin{array}{ccccccc}\hfill 3=\frac{3}{1}\hfill & & & \hfill -8=-\frac{8}{1}\hfill & & & \hfill 0=\frac{0}{1}\hfill \end{array}[/latex]

Since any integer can be written as the ratio of two integers, all integers are rational numbers! Remember that the counting numbers and the whole numbers are also integers, and so they, too, are rational.

What about decimals? Are they rational? Let’s look at a few to see if we can write each of them as the ratio of two integers.

We’ve already seen that integers are rational numbers. The integer [latex]-8[/latex] could be written as the decimal [latex]-8.0[/latex]. So, clearly, some decimals are rational.

Think about the decimal 7.3. Can we write it as a ratio of two integers? Because 7.3 means [latex]7\frac{3}{10}[/latex], we can write it as an improper fraction, [latex]\frac{73}{10}[/latex]. So 7.3 is the ratio of the integers 73 and 10. It is a rational number.

In general, any decimal that ends after a number of digits (such as [latex]7.3[/latex] or [latex]-1.2684[/latex]) is a rational number. We can use the place value of the last digit as the denominator when writing the decimal as a fraction.

Example 1.6.1

Write as the ratio of two integers:

  1. −27
  2. 7.31
Solution

a.

Step 1: Write it as a fraction with denominator 1.

[latex]-27=\frac{-27}1[/latex]


b.

Step 1: Write it as a mixed number.

Remember, 7 is the whole number and the decimal part, 0.31, indicates hundredths.

[latex]7\frac{31}{100}[/latex]

Step 2: Convert to an improper fraction.

[latex]\frac{731}{100}[/latex]

So we see that [latex]-27[/latex] and [latex]7.31[/latex] are both rational numbers, since they can be written as the ratio of two integers.

Try It 

Write as the ratio of two integers:

13) [latex]-24[/latex]
14) [latex]3.57[/latex]

Solution

13) [latex]\frac{-24}{1}[/latex]

14) [latex]\frac{357}{100}[/latex]

Try It 

Write as the ratio of two integers:

15) [latex]-19[/latex]
16) [latex]8.41[/latex]

Solution

15) [latex]\frac{-19}{1}[/latex]

16) [latex]\frac{841}{100}[/latex]

Let’s look at the decimal form of the numbers we know are rational.

We have seen that every integer is a rational number, since [latex]a=\frac{a}{1}[/latex] for any integer, [latex]a[/latex]. We can also change any integer to a decimal by adding a decimal point and a zero.

[latex]\begin{array}{ccccccccccccccccccccc}\text{Integer}\hfill & & & & & -2\hfill & & & -1\hfill & & & 0\hfill & & & 1\hfill & & & 2\hfill & & & 3\hfill \\ \text{Decimal form}\hfill & & & & & -2.0\hfill & & & -1.0\hfill & & & 0.0\hfill & & & 1.0\hfill & & & 2.0\hfill & & & 3.0\hfill \end{array}[/latex]
[latex]\text{These decimal numbers stop.}[/latex]

We have also seen that every fraction is a rational number. Look at the decimal form of the fractions we considered above.

[latex]\begin{array}{ccccccccccccccc}\text{Ratio of integers}\hfill & & & & & \frac{4}{5}\hfill & & & -\frac{7}{8}\hfill & & & \frac{13}{4}\hfill & & & -\frac{20}{3}\hfill \\ \text{The decimal form}\hfill & & & & & 0.8\hfill & & & -0.875\hfill & & & 3.25\hfill & & & \begin{array}{}\\ -6.666\text{…}\hfill \\ -6.\stackrel{\text{–}}{6}\hfill \end{array}\hfill \end{array}[/latex]
[latex]\text{These decimals either stop or repeat.}[/latex]

What do these examples tell us?

Every rational number can be written both as a ratio of integers, [latex]\frac{p}{q}[/latex], where p and q are integers and [latex]q\ne 0[/latex], and as a decimal that either stops or repeats.

Here are the numbers we looked at above expressed as a ratio of integers and as a decimal:

  Fractions Integers            
Number [latex]\frac{4}{5}[/latex] [latex]-\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{7}{8}[/latex] [latex]\frac{13}{4}[/latex] [latex]-\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{20}{3}[/latex] [latex]-2[/latex] [latex]-1[/latex] [latex]0[/latex] [latex]1[/latex] [latex]2[/latex] [latex]3[/latex]
Ratio of Integers  [latex]\frac{4}{5}[/latex] [latex]-\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{7}{8}[/latex] [latex]\frac{13}{4}[/latex] [latex]-\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{20}{3}[/latex] [latex]-\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{2}{1}[/latex]  [latex]-\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\frac{1}{1}[/latex] [latex]\frac{0}{1}[/latex] [latex]\frac{1}{1}[/latex]  [latex]\frac{2}{1}[/latex]  [latex]\frac{3}{1}[/latex]
Decimal Form  [latex]0.8[/latex]  [latex]-0.875[/latex] [latex]3.25[/latex] [latex]-6.\stackrel{\text{–}}{6}[/latex] [latex]-2.0[/latex] [latex]-1.0[/latex] [latex]0.0[/latex] [latex]1.0[/latex] [latex]2.0[/latex] [latex]3.0[/latex]

Rational Number

A rational number is a number of the form [latex]\frac{p}{q}[/latex], where [latex]p[/latex] and [latex]q[/latex] are integers and [latex]q\ne 0[/latex].

Its decimal form stops or repeats.

Are there any decimals that do not stop or repeat? Yes!

The number [latex]\pi[/latex] (the Greek letter pi, pronounced “pie”), which is very important in describing circles, has a decimal form that does not stop or repeat.

[latex]\pi =3.141592654...[/latex]

We can even create a decimal pattern that does not stop or repeat, such as

[latex]2.01001000100001\dots[/latex]

Numbers whose decimal form does not stop or repeat cannot be written as a fraction of integers. We call these numbers irrational.

Irrational Number

An irrational number is a number that cannot be written as the ratio of two integers.

Its decimal form does not stop and does not repeat.

Let’s summarize a method we can use to determine whether a number is rational or irrational.

Rational or Irrational?

If the decimal form of a number

  • repeats or stops, the number is rational.
  • does not repeat and does not stop, the number is irrational.

Example 1.6.2

Given the numbers [latex]0.58\bar{3}[/latex], [latex]0.47[/latex], [latex]3.605551275...[/latex] list the

  1. rational numbers
  2. irrational numbers
Solution

a.

Step 1: Look for decimals that repeat or stop.

The [latex]3[/latex] repeats in [latex]0.58\bar{3}[/latex].

The decimal [latex]0.47[/latex] stops after the [latex]7[/latex].

So [latex]0.58\bar{3}[/latex] and [latex]0.47[/latex] are rational.


b.

Step 1: Look for decimals that repeat or stop.

[latex]3.605551275...[/latex] has no repeating block of digits and it does not stop.

So [latex]3.605551275...[/latex] is irrational.

Try It 

For the given numbers list the:

17) rational numbers
18) irrational numbers

[latex]0.29[/latex], [latex]0.81\bar{6}[/latex], [latex]2.515115111...[/latex]

Solution

17) [latex]0.29,0.81\bar{6}[/latex]
18) [latex]2.515115111...[/latex]

Try It 

For the given numbers list the:

19) rational numbers
20) irrational numbers

[latex]2.6\bar{3}[/latex], [latex]0.125[/latex], [latex]0.418302...[/latex]

Solution

19) [latex]2.6\bar{3}[/latex], [latex]0.125[/latex]
20) [latex]0.418302...[/latex]

Try It 

For each number given, identify whether it is rational or irrational:

21) [latex]\sqrt{36}[/latex]
22) [latex]\sqrt{44}[/latex]

Solution

21) Recognize that [latex]36[/latex] is a perfect square, since [latex]{6}^{2}=36[/latex]. So [latex]\sqrt{36}=6,[/latex] therefore [latex]\sqrt{36}[/latex] is rational.
22) Remember that [latex]{6}^{2}=36[/latex] and [latex]{7}^{2}=49,[/latex] so [latex]44[/latex] is not a perfect square. Therefore, the decimal form of [latex]\sqrt{44}[/latex] will never repeat and never stop, so [latex]\sqrt{44}[/latex] is irrational.

Try It 

For each number given, identify whether it is rational or irrational:

23) [latex]\sqrt{81}[/latex]
24) [latex]\sqrt{17}[/latex]

Solution

23) rational
24) irrational

Try It 

For each number given, identify whether it is rational or irrational:

25) [latex]\sqrt{116}[/latex]
26) [latex]\sqrt{121}[/latex]

Solution

25) irrational
26) rational

We have seen that all counting numbers are whole numbers, all whole numbers are integers, and all integers are rational numbers. The irrational numbers are numbers whose decimal form does not stop and does not repeat. When we put together the rational numbers and the irrational numbers, we get the set of real numbers.

Real Number

A real number is a number that is either rational or irrational.

All the numbers we use in elementary algebra are real numbers. Figure 1.6.1 illustrates how the number sets we’ve discussed in this section fit together.

This figure consists of a Venn diagram. To start there is a large rectangle marked Real Numbers. The right half of the rectangle consists of Irrational Numbers. The left half consists of Rational Numbers. Within the Rational Numbers rectangle, there are Integers …, negative 2, negative 1, 0, 1, 2, …. Within the Integers rectangle, there are Whole Numbers 0, 1, 2, 3, … Within the Whole Numbers rectangle, there are Counting Numbers 1, 2, 3, …
Figure 1.6.1. This chart shows the number sets that make up the set of real numbers. Does the term “real numbers” seem strange to you? Are there any numbers that are not “real,” and, if so, what could they be?

This chart shows the number sets that make up the set of real numbers. Does the term “real numbers” seem strange to you? Are there any numbers that are not “real,” and, if so, what could they be?

Can we simplify [latex]\sqrt{-25}[/latex]? Is there a number whose square is [latex]-25[/latex]?

[latex]{\left(\text{}\phantom{\rule{0.5em}{0ex}}\right)}^{2}=-25[/latex]?

None of the numbers that we have dealt with so far has a square that is [latex]-25[/latex]. Why? Any positive number squared is positive. Any negative number squared is positive. So we say there is no real number equal to [latex]\sqrt{-25}[/latex].

The square root of a negative number is not a real number.

Try It

For each number given, identify whether it is a real number or not a real number:

27) [latex]\sqrt{-169}[/latex]
28) [latex]-\sqrt{64}[/latex]

Solution

27) There is no real number whose square is [latex]-169[/latex]. Therefore, [latex]\sqrt{-169}[/latex] is not a real number.
28) Since the negative is in front of the radical, [latex]-\sqrt{64}[/latex] is [latex]-8[/latex]. Since [latex]-8[/latex] is a real number, [latex]-\sqrt{64}[/latex] is a real number.

Try It

For each number given, identify whether it is a real number or not a real number:

29) [latex]\sqrt{-196}[/latex]
30) [latex]\text{−}\sqrt{81}[/latex]

Solution

29) not a real number
30) real number

Try It

For each number given, identify whether it is a real number or not a real number:

31) [latex]\text{−}\sqrt{49}[/latex]
32) [latex]\sqrt{-121}[/latex]

Solution

31) real number
32) not a real number

Example 1.6.3

Given the numbers [latex]-7,\frac{14}{5},8,\sqrt{5},5.9,\text{−}\sqrt{64}[/latex], list the:

  1. whole numbers
  2. integers
  3. rational numbers
  4. irrational numbers
  5. real numbers
Solution

a. Remember, the whole numbers are 0, 1, 2, 3, … and 8 is the only whole number given.


b. The integers are the whole numbers, their opposites, and 0. So the whole number 8 is an integer, and [latex]-7[/latex] is the opposite of a whole number so it is an integer, too. Also, notice that 64 is the square of 8 so [latex]\text{−}\sqrt{64}=-8[/latex]. So the integers are [latex]-7,8,\text{−}\sqrt{64}[/latex].


c. Since all integers are rational, then [latex]-7,8,\text{−}\sqrt{64}[/latex] are rational. Rational numbers also include fractions and decimals that repeat or stop, so [latex]\frac{14}{5}\;\text{and}\;5.9[/latex] are rational. So the list of rational numbers is [latex]-7,\frac{14}{5},8,5.9,-\sqrt{64}[/latex].


d. Remember that 5 is not a perfect square, so [latex]\sqrt{5}[/latex] is irrational.


e. All the numbers listed are real numbers.

Try It

For the given numbers, list the:

33) whole numbers
34) integers
35) rational numbers
36) irrational numbers
37) real numbers

[latex]-3,\text{−}\sqrt{2},0.\bar{3},\frac{9}{5},4,\sqrt{49}[/latex].

Solution

33) [latex]4,\sqrt{49}[/latex]
34) [latex]-3,4,\sqrt{49}[/latex]
35) [latex]-3,0.\bar{3},\frac{9}{5},4,\sqrt{49}[/latex]
36) [latex]\text{−}\sqrt{2}[/latex]
37) [latex]-3,\text{−}\sqrt{2},0.\bar{3},\frac{9}{5},4,\sqrt{49}[/latex]

Try It

For the given numbers, list the:

38) whole numbers
39) integers
40) rational numbers
41) irrational numbers
42) real numbers

[latex]\text{−}\sqrt{25},-\frac{3}{8},-1,6,\sqrt{121},2.041975\text{…}[/latex]

Solution

38) [latex]6,\sqrt{121}[/latex]
39) [latex]\text{−}\sqrt{25},-1,6,\sqrt{121}[/latex]
40) [latex]\text{−}\sqrt{25},-\frac{3}{8},-1,6,\sqrt{121}[/latex]
41) [latex]2.041975\text{…}[/latex]
42) [latex]\text{−}\sqrt{25},-\frac{3}{8},-1,6,\sqrt{121},2.041975\text{…}[/latex]

Locate Fractions on the Number Line

The last time we looked at the number line, it only had positive and negative integers on it. We now want to include fractions and decimals on it.

Let’s start with fractions and locate [latex]\frac{1}{5},-\frac{4}{5},3,\frac{7}{4},-\frac{9}{2},-5,\;\text{and}\;\frac{8}{3}[/latex] on the number line.

We’ll start with the whole numbers [latex]3[/latex] and [latex]-5[/latex], because they are the easiest to plot. See Figure 1.6.2

The proper fractions listed are [latex]\frac{1}{5}\;\text{and}\;-\frac{4}{5}[/latex]. We know the proper fraction [latex]\frac{1}{5}[/latex] has value less than one and so would be located between [latex]0\;\text{and}\;1[/latex]. The denominator is 5, so we divide the unit from 0 to 1 into 5 equal parts [latex]\frac{1}{5},\frac{2}{5},\frac{3}{5},\frac{4}{5}[/latex]. We plot [latex]\frac{1}{5}[/latex]. See Figure 1.6.2.

Similarly, [latex]-\frac{4}{5}[/latex] is between [latex]0[/latex] and [latex]-1[/latex]. After dividing the unit into 5 equal parts we plot [latex]-\frac{4}{5}[/latex]. See Figure 1.6.2

Finally, look at the improper fractions [latex]\frac{7}{4},-\frac{9}{2},\frac{8}{3}[/latex]. These are fractions in which the numerator is greater than the denominator. Locating these points may be easier if you change each of them to a mixed number. See Figure. 1.6.2.

[latex]\begin{array}{ccccccc}\hfill \frac{7}{4}=1\frac{3}{4}\hfill & & & \hfill -\frac{9}{2}=-4\frac{1}{2}\hfill & & & \hfill \frac{8}{3}=2\frac{2}{3}\hfill \end{array}[/latex]

Figure 1.6.2 shows the number line with all the points plotted.

There is a number line shown that runs from negative 6 to positive 6. From left to right, the numbers marked are negative 5, negative 9/2, negative 4/5, 1/5, 4/5, 8/3, and 3. The number negative 9/2 is halfway between negative 5 and negative 4. The number negative 4/5 is slightly to the right of negative 1. The number 1/5 is slightly to the right of 0. The number 4/5 is slightly to the left of 1. The number 8/3 is between 2 and 3, but a little closer to 3.
Figure 1.6.2

Example 1.6.4

Locate and label the following on a number line: [latex]4,\frac{3}{4},-\frac{1}{4},-3,\frac{6}{5},-\frac{5}{2},\;\text{and}\;\frac{7}{3}[/latex].

Solution

Locate and plot the integers, [latex]4,-3[/latex]

Step 1: Locate the proper fraction [latex]\frac{3}{4}[/latex] first.

The fraction [latex]\frac{3}{4}[/latex] is between [latex]0[/latex] and [latex]1[/latex].

Step 2:  Divide the distance between 0 and 1 into four equal parts then, we plot [latex]\frac{3}{4}[/latex].

Similarly plot [latex]-\frac{1}{4}[/latex].

Step 3: Now locate the improper fractions [latex]\frac{6}{5},-\frac{5}{2},\frac{7}{3}[/latex]. 

[latex]\begin{eqnarray*}\frac65&=&1\frac15\\-\frac52&=&-2\frac12\\\frac73&=&2\frac13\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

It is easier to plot them if we convert them to mixed numbers and then plot them as described above:

There is a number line shown that runs from negative 4 to positive 4. From left to right, the numbers marked are negative 3 and 1/2, negative 3, negative 8/3, negative 2, negative 1, negative 3/4, negative 2/3, and negative 1/4. The number negative 3 and 1/2 is between negative 4 and negative 3 The number negative 8/3 is between negative 3 and negative 2, but closer to negative 3. The numbers negative 3/4, negative 2/3, and negative 1/4 are all between negative 1 and 0.
Figure 1.6.3

Try It 

43) Locate and label the following on a number line: [latex]-1,\frac{1}{3},\frac{6}{5},-\frac{7}{4},\frac{9}{2},5,-\frac{8}{3}[/latex].

Solution
There is a number line shown that runs from negative 4 to positive 5. From left to right, the numbers marked are negative 8/3, negative 7/4, negative 1, 1/3, 6/5, 9/2, and 5. The number negative 8/3 is between negative 3 and negative 2 but slightly closer to negative 3. The number negative 7/4 is slightly to the right of negative 2. The number 1/3 is slightly to the right of 0. The number 6/5 is slightly to the right of 1. The number 9/2 is halfway between 4 and 5.
Figure 1.6.4

Try It 

44) Locate and label the following on a number line: [latex]-2,\frac{2}{3},\frac{7}{5},-\frac{7}{4},\frac{7}{2},3,-\frac{7}{3}[/latex].

Solution
There is a number line shown that runs from negative 4 to positive 5. From left to right, the numbers marked are negative 7/3, negative 2, negative 7/4, 2/3, 7/5, 3, and 7/2. The number negative 7/3 is between negative 3 and negative 2 but slightly closer to negative 2. The number negative 7/4 is slightly to the right of negative 2. The number 2/3 is slightly to the left of 1. The number 7/5 is between 1 and 2, but closer to 1. The number 7/2 is halfway between 3 and 4.
Figure 1.6.5

In Example 1.6.5, we’ll use the inequality symbols to order fractions. In previous chapters we used the number line to order numbers.

      • [latex]a < b[/latex] “[latex]a[/latex] is less than [latex]b[/latex]” when [latex]a[/latex] is to the left of [latex]b[/latex] on the number line
      • [latex]a > b[/latex] “[latex]a[/latex] is greater than [latex]b[/latex]” when [latex]a[/latex] is to the right of [latex]b[/latex] on the number line

As we move from left to right on a number line, the values increase.

Example 1.6.5

Order each of the following pairs of numbers, using [latex]<[/latex] or [latex]>[/latex]. It may be helpful to refer Figure 1.6.6.

  1. [latex]-\frac{2}{3}\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-1[/latex]
  2. [latex]-3\frac{1}{2}\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-3[/latex]
  3. [latex]-\frac{3}{4}\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-\frac{1}{4}[/latex]
  4. [latex]-2\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-\frac{8}{3}[/latex]
There is a number line shown that runs from negative 4 to positive 4. From left to right, the numbers marked are negative 3 and 1/2, negative 3, negative 8/3, negative 2, negative 1, negative 3/4, negative 2/3, and negative 1/4. The number negative 3 and 1/2 is between negative 4 and negative 3 The number negative 8/3 is between negative 3 and negative 2, but closer to negative 3. The numbers negative 3/4, negative 2/3, and negative 1/4 are all between negative 1 and 0.
Figure 1.6.6
Solution

a.

Step 1: [latex]-\frac{2}{3}[/latex] is to the right of [latex]-1[/latex] on the number line.

[latex]-\frac23\;\_\_\_\;-1\;=\;-\frac23\;>\;-1[/latex]


b.

Step 1: [latex]-3\frac{1}{2}[/latex] is to the right of [latex]-3[/latex] on the number line.

[latex]-3\frac12\;\_\_\_\;-3\;=\;-3\frac12<\;-3[/latex]


c.

Step 1: [latex]-\frac{3}{4}[/latex] is to the right of [latex]-\frac{1}{4}[/latex] on the number line.

[latex]-\frac34\_\_\_-\frac14\;=\;-\frac34<-\frac14[/latex]


d.

Step 1: [latex]-2[/latex] is to the right of [latex]-\frac{8}{3}[/latex] on the number line.

[latex]-2\;\_\_\_-\frac83\;=\;-2\;>\;-\frac83[/latex]

Try It 

Order each of the following pairs of numbers, using < or >:

45) [latex]-\frac{1}{3}\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-1[/latex]
46) [latex]-1\frac{1}{2}\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-2[/latex]
47) [latex]-\frac{2}{3}\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-\frac{1}{3}[/latex]
48) [latex]-3\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-\frac{7}{3}[/latex]

Solution

45) [latex]>[/latex]
46) [latex]>[/latex]
47) [latex]<[/latex] 48) [latex]<[/latex]

Try It 

Order each of the following pairs of numbers, using < or >:

49) [latex]-1\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-\frac{2}{3}[/latex]
50) [latex]-2\frac{1}{4}\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-2[/latex]
51) [latex]-\frac{3}{5}\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-\frac{4}{5}[/latex]
52) [latex]-4\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-\frac{10}{3}[/latex]

Solution

49) [latex]<[/latex] 50) [latex]<[/latex] 51) [latex]>[/latex]
52) [latex]<[/latex]

Locate Decimals on the Number Line

Since decimals are forms of fractions, locating decimals on the number line is similar to locating fractions on the number line.

Example 1.6.6

Locate [latex]0.4[/latex] on the number line.

Solution

Step 1: A proper fraction has value less than one.

The decimal number [latex]0.4[/latex] is equivalent to [latex]\frac{4}{10}[/latex], a proper fraction, so [latex]0.4[/latex] is located between [latex]0[/latex] and [latex]1[/latex].

Step 2: On a number line, divide the interval between 0 and 1 into 10 equal parts.
Step 3: Now label the parts 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0.

We write [latex]0[/latex] as [latex]0.0[/latex] and [latex]1[/latex] and [latex]1.0[/latex], so that the numbers are consistently in tenths.

Step 4: Finally, mark 0.4 on the number line. See Figure 1.6.7.

There is a number line shown that runs from 0.0 to 1. The only point given is 0.4, which is between 0.3 and 0.5.
Figure 1.6.7

Try It

53) Locate on the number line: [latex]0.6[/latex].

Solution
There is a number line shown that runs from 0.0 to 1. The only point given is 0.6, which is between 0.5 and 0.7.
Figure 1.6.8

Try It 

54) Locate on the number line: [latex]0.9[/latex].

Solution
There is a number line shown that runs from 0.0 to 1. The only point given is 0.9, which is between 0.8 and 1.
Figure 1.6.9

Example 1.6.7

Locate [latex]-0.74[/latex] on the number line.

Solution

Step 1: The decimal [latex]-0.74[/latex] is equivalent to [latex]-\frac{74}{100}[/latex], so it is located between [latex]0[/latex] and [latex]-1[/latex].

Step 2: On a number line, mark off and label the hundredths in the interval between [latex]0[/latex] and [latex]-1[/latex]. See Figure 1.6.10.

 

There is a number line shown that runs from negative 1.00 to 0.00. The only point given is negative 0.74, which is between negative 0.8 and negative 0.7.
Figure 1.6.10

Try It

55) Locate on the number line: [latex]-0.6[/latex].

Solution
There is a number line shown that runs from negative 1.00 to 0.00. The only point given is negative 0.6, which is between negative 0.8 and negative 0.4.
Figure 1.6.11

Try It 

56) Locate on the number line: [latex]-0.7[/latex].

Solution
There is a number line shown that runs from negative 1.00 to 0.00. The only point given is negative 0.7, which is between negative 0.8 and negative 0.6.
Figure 1.6.12

Which is larger, [latex]0.04[/latex] or [latex]0.40[/latex]? If you think of this as money, you know that [latex]\$0.40[/latex] (forty cents) is greater than [latex]\$0.04[/latex] (four cents). So, [latex]0.40>0.04[/latex].

Again, we can use the number line to order numbers.

    • [latex]a < b[/latex] “[latex]a[/latex] is less than [latex]b[/latex]” when [latex]a[/latex] is to the left of [latex]b[/latex] on the number line
    • [latex]a > b[/latex] “[latex]a[/latex] is greater than [latex]b[/latex]” when [latex]a[/latex] is to the right of [latex]b[/latex] on the number line

Where are [latex]0.04[/latex] and [latex]0.40[/latex] located on the number line? See Figure 1.6.13.

There is a number line shown that runs from negative 0.0 to 1.0. From left to right, there are points 0.04 and 0.4 marked. The point 0.04 is between 0.0 and 0.1. The point 0.4 is between 0.3 and 0.5.
Figure 1.6.13

We see that [latex]0.40[/latex] is to the right of [latex]0.04[/latex] on the number line. This is another way to demonstrate that [latex]0.40 > 0.04[/latex].

How does [latex]0.31[/latex] compare to [latex]0.308[/latex]? This doesn’t translate into money to make it easy to compare. But if we convert [latex]0.31[/latex] and [latex]0.308[/latex] into fractions, we can tell which is larger.

Steps 0.31  0.308
Convert to fractions. [latex]\frac{31}{100}[/latex] [latex]\frac{308}{1000}[/latex]
We need a common denominator to compare them. [latex]\frac{31\times10}{100\times10}[/latex] [latex]\frac{308}{1000}[/latex]
[latex]\frac{310}{1000}[/latex] [latex]\frac{308}{1000}[/latex]

Because [latex]310 > 308[/latex], we know that [latex]\frac{310}{1000}>\frac{308}{1000}[/latex]. Therefore, [latex]0.31 > 0.308[/latex].

Notice what we did in converting [latex]0.31[/latex] to a fraction—we started with the fraction [latex]\frac{31}{100}[/latex] and ended with the equivalent fraction [latex]\frac{310}{1000}[/latex]. Converting [latex]\frac{310}{1000}[/latex] back to a decimal gives [latex]0.310[/latex]. So [latex]0.31[/latex] is equivalent to [latex]0.310[/latex]. Writing zeros at the end of a decimal does not change its value!

[latex]\frac{31}{100}=\frac{310}{1000}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}\text{and}\phantom{\rule{1em}{0ex}}0.31=0.310[/latex]

We say [latex]0.31[/latex] and [latex]0.310[/latex] are equivalent decimals.

Equivalent Decimals

Two decimals are equivalent if they convert to equivalent fractions.

We use equivalent decimals when we order decimals.

The steps we take to order decimals are summarized here.

HOW TO

Order Decimals

Step 1: Write the numbers one under the other, lining up the decimal points.
Step 2: Check to see if both numbers have the same number of digits. If not, write zeros at the end of the one with fewer digits to make them match.
Step 3: Compare the numbers as if they were whole numbers.
Step 4: Order the numbers using the appropriate inequality sign.

Example 1.6.8

Order [latex]0.64\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}0.6[/latex] using [latex]<[/latex] or [latex]>[/latex].

Solution

Step 1: Write the numbers one under the other, lining up the decimal points.

[latex]\begin{array}{c}0.64\\ 0.6\end{array}[/latex]

Step 2: Add a zero to 0.6 to make it a decimal with 2 decimal places.
Now they are both hundredths.

 [latex]\begin{array}{c}0.64\\ 0.60\end{array}[/latex]

Step 3: 64 is greater than 60.

[latex]64>60[/latex]

Step 4: 64 hundredths is greater than 60 hundredths.

 [latex]0.64>0.60[/latex]

Try It

57) Order each of the following pairs of numbers, using [latex]<\text{or}>\text{:}0.42\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}0.4[/latex].

Solution

[latex]>[/latex]

Try It

58) Order each of the following pairs of numbers, using [latex]<\text{or}>\text{:}0.18\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}0.1[/latex].

Solution

[latex]>[/latex]

Example 1.6.9

Order [latex]0.83\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}0.803[/latex] using [latex]<[/latex] or [latex]>[/latex].

Solution

Step 1: Write the numbers one under the other, lining up the decimals.
Step 2: They do not have the same number of digits.

[latex]\begin{eqnarray*}0&.&83\\0&.&803\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

Step 3: Write one zero at the end of [latex]0.83[/latex].

[latex]\begin{eqnarray*}0&.&830\\ 0&.&803\end{eqnarray*}[/latex]

Step 4: Since [latex]830>803[/latex], [latex]830[/latex] thousandths is greater than [latex]803[/latex] thousandths.

[latex]0.830>0.803[/latex]
[latex]0.83>0.803[/latex]

Try It

59) Order the following pair of numbers, using [latex]<\text{or}>\text{:}0.76\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}0.706[/latex].

Solution

[latex]>[/latex]

Try It

60) Order the following pair of numbers, using [latex]<\text{or}>\text{:}0.305\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}0.35[/latex].

Solution

[latex]<[/latex]

When we order negative decimals, it is important to remember how to order negative integers. Recall that larger numbers are to the right on the number line. For example, because [latex]-2[/latex] lies to the right of [latex]-3[/latex] on the number line, we know that [latex]-2>-3[/latex]. Similarly, smaller numbers lie to the left on the number line. For example, because [latex]-9[/latex] lies to the left of [latex]-6[/latex] on the number line, we know that [latex]-9<-6[/latex]. See Figure 1.6.14.

There is a number line shown that runs from negative 10 to 0. There are not points given and the hashmarks exist at every integer between negative 10 and 0.
Figure 1.6.14

If we zoomed in on the interval between [latex]0[/latex] and [latex]-1[/latex], as shown in Figure 1.6.6, we would see in the same way that [latex]-0.2>-0.3[/latex] and [latex]-0.9<-0.6[/latex].

Example 1.6.10

Use [latex]<[/latex] or [latex]>[/latex] to order [latex]-0.1\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-0.8[/latex].

Solution

Step 1: Write the numbers one under the other, lining up the decimal points.

They have the same number of digits. [latex]\begin{array}{c}-0.1\\ -0.8\end{array}[/latex]

Since [latex]-1>-8[/latex], [latex]−1[/latex] tenth is greater than [latex]−8[/latex] tenths. [latex]-0.1>-0.8[/latex]

Try It

61) Order the following pair of numbers, using < or >: [latex]-0.3\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-0.5[/latex].

Solution

[latex]>[/latex]

Try It 

62) Order the following pair of numbers, using < or >: [latex]-0.6\underline{\hspace{0.5cm}}-0.7[/latex].

Solution

[latex]>[/latex]

Key Concepts

Square Root Notation

[latex]\sqrt{m}[/latex] is read ‘the square root of [latex]m[/latex].’ If [latex]m={n}^{2}[/latex], then [latex]\sqrt{m}=n[/latex], for [latex]n\ge 0[/latex].

Order Decimals

  1. Write the numbers one under the other, lining up the decimal points.
  2. Check to see if both numbers have the same number of digits. If not, write zeros at the end of the one with fewer digits to make them match.
  3. Compare the numbers as if they were whole numbers.
  4. Order the numbers using the appropriate inequality sign.

Self Check

After completing the exercises, use this checklist to evaluate your mastery of the objectives of this section.

What does this checklist tell you about your mastery of this section? What steps will you take to improve?

Glossary

equivalent decimals
Two decimals are equivalent if they convert to equivalent fractions.

irrational number
An irrational number is a number that cannot be written as the ratio of two integers. Its decimal form does not stop and does not repeat.

rational numberA rational number is a number of the form [latex]\frac{p}{q}[/latex], where [latex]p[/latex] and [latex]q[/latex] are integers and [latex]q\ne 0[/latex]. A rational number can be written as the ratio of two integers. Its decimal form stops or repeats.

radical sign
A radical sign is the symbol [latex]\sqrt{m}[/latex] that denotes the positive square root.

real number
A real number is a number that is either rational or irrational.

square and square root
If [latex]{n}^{2}=m[/latex], then [latex]m[/latex] is the square of [latex]n[/latex] and [latex]n[/latex] is a square root of [latex]m[/latex].

definition

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Fanshawe Pre-Health Sciences Mathematics 1 Copyright © 2022 by Domenic Spilotro, MSc is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book