Chapter 6: Syntax
6.17 Trees: Structural ambiguity
In Section 5.9 we saw cases of structural ambiguity in morphology, cases where the same string of morphemes can have more than one structure, with each structure corresponding to a different interpretation.
The same thing is found in syntax. Consider the following example:
| (1) | I saw someone with a telescope. |
This has two possible interpretations:
- I was using a telescope, and I saw someone. (PP modifies VP)
- I saw someone, and that person had a telescope. (PP modifies NP)
In the first interpretation, the prepositional phrase [PP with a telescope] modifies the verb phrase headed by saw. In the second interpretation, the same prepositional phrase modifies the noun phrase someone. These two structures are illustrated below:
![Tree diagram: [I saw someone with a telescope], [with a telescope] is child and sibling of V'](https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/1310/2022/02/617_tree1_sawwithtelescope.png)
![Tree diagram: [I saw someone with a telescope], [with a telescope] is child and sibling of N' above [N someone]](https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/app/uploads/sites/1310/2022/02/617_tree2_personwithtelescope.png)
The same will be true for other cases of structural ambiguity—each meaning will correspond to a different potential tree structure.
Many cases of structural ambiguity in syntax involve modifiers in adjunct positions on one or both interpretations. Some of the practical implications of ambiguity are discussed in 8.3 Semantics and pragmatics in the legal domain.
Check your understanding
Coming soon!
Navigation
If you are following the alternative path through this chapter that interleaves core concepts with tree structures, the previous section was 6.16 Trees: Modifiers as adjuncts and the next section is 6.6 Clausal embedding.
