4.2 Markup

Section Exercises – after the reading

Work on section 4.2 exercises in Fundamentals of Business Math Exercises after reading this section. Discuss your solutions with your peers and/or course instructor.

You may consult answers to select exercises: Fundamentals of Business Math Exercises – Select Answers

As you wait in line to purchase your Iced Caramel Macchiato at Starbucks, you look at the pricing menu and think that $4.99 seems like an awful lot of money for a frozen coffee beverage. Clearly, the coffee itself doesn’t cost anywhere near that much. But then gazing around the café, you notice the carefully applied colour scheme, the comfortable seating, the high-end machinery behind the counter, and a seemingly well-trained barista who answers customer questions knowledgeably. Where did the money to pay for all of this come from? You smile as you realize your $4.99 pays not just for the macchiato, but for everything else that comes with it.

The process of taking a product’s cost and increasing it by some amount to arrive at a selling price is called markup. This process is critical to business success because every business must ensure that it does not lose money when it makes a sale. From the consumer perspective, the concept of markup helps you make sense of the prices that businesses charge for their products or services. This in turn helps you to judge how reasonable some prices are (and hopefully to find better deals).

The Components in a Selling Price

Before you learn to calculate markup, you first have to understand the various components of a selling price. Then, in the next section, markup and its various methods of calculation will become much clearer.

When your business acquires merchandise for resale, this is a monetary outlay representing a cost. When you then resell the product, the price you charge must recover more than just the product cost. You must also recover all the selling and operating expenses associated with the product. Ultimately, you also need to make some money, or profit, as a result of the whole process.

Most people think that marking up a product must be a fairly complex process. It is not. Below is an illustration of the relationship between  cost, expenses, and profits in calculating the selling price.

The selling price of a product

[latex]\begin{align*} \text{selling price}&=\text{cost}+\overbrace{\text{expenses}+\text{profit}}^{\text{markup amount}}\\ &=\text{cost}+\text{markup amount}\\ \\ \\ S&=C+\overbrace{E+P}^{M}\\ &=C+{M} \end{align*}[/latex]

[latex]S[/latex] is selling price: Once you calculate what the business paid for the product (cost), the bills it needs to cover (expenses), and how much money it needs to earn (profit), you arrive at a selling price by summing the three components.

[latex]C[/latex] is cost: The cost is the amount of money that the business must pay to purchase or manufacture the product. If manufactured, the cost represents all costs incurred to make the product. If purchased, this number results from applying an appropriate discount formula from Section 4.1. There is a list price from which the business will deduct discounts to arrive at the net price. The net price paid for the product equals the cost of the product. If a business purchases or manufactures a product for $10 then it must sell the product for at least $10. Otherwise, it fails to recover what was paid to acquire or make the product in the first place—a path to sheer disaster!

[latex]E[/latex] is expenses: Expenses are the financial outlays involved in selling the product. Beyond just purchasing the product, the business has many more bills to pay, including wages, taxes, leases, equipment, electronics, insurance, utilities, fixtures, décor, and many more. These expenses must be recovered and may be calculated as:

  • A fixed dollar amount per unit.
  • A percentage of the product cost. For example, if a business forecasts total merchandise costs of $100,000 for the coming year and total business expenses of $50,000, then it may set a general guideline of adding 50% ($50,000 ÷ $100,000) to the cost of a product to cover expenses.
  • A percentage of the product selling price based on a forecast of future sales. For example, if a business forecasts total sales of $250,000 and total business expenses of $50,000, then it may set a general guideline of adding 20% ($50,000 ÷ $250,000) of the selling price to the cost of a product to cover expenses.

[latex]P[/latex] is profit: Profit is the amount of money that remains after a business pays all of its costs and expenses. A business needs to add an amount above its costs and expenses to allow it to grow. If it adds too much profit, though, the product’s price will be too high, in which case the customer may refuse to purchase it. If it adds too little profit, the product’s price may be too low, in which case the customer may perceive the product as shoddy and once again refuse to purchase it. Many businesses set general guidelines on how much profit to add to various products. As with expenses, this profit may be expressed as:

  • A fixed dollar amount per unit.
  • A percentage of the product cost.
  • A percentage of the selling price.

[latex]M[/latex] is markup amount: Markup is the amount of money that has to be added to the cost of the item to cover for expenses and produce profit from sale of the item.

For example, assume a business pays a net price of $75 to acquire a product. Through analyzing its finances, the business estimates expenses at $25 per unit, and it figures it can add $50 in profit. Calculate the selling price.

We have to calculate the selling price and we are given the cost [latex]C=\$ 75[/latex], the expenses [latex]E=\$ 25[/latex] and the profit [latex]P=\$ 50[/latex].

Therefore, the unit selling price is:

[latex]\text{selling price} =C+E+P=75+25+50=\$150[/latex]

When building the equation, you must adhere to the basic rule of linear equations requiring all terms to be in the same unit. That is, you could use the formula above to solve for the selling price of an individual product, where the three components are the unit cost, unit expenses, and unit profit. When you add these, you calculate the unit selling price. Alternatively, you could use the same formula in an aggregate form where the three components are total cost, total expenses, and total profit. In this case, the selling price is a total selling price, which is more commonly known as total revenue. But you cannot mix individual components with aggregate components.

The most common mistake in working with pricing components occurs in understanding the context, the task, and the conditions given. It is critical to identify and label information correctly. You have to pay attention to details such as whether you are expressing the expenses in dollar format or as a percentage of either cost or selling price. Systematically work your way through the information provided piece by piece to ensure that you do not miss an important detail.

Give It Some Thought:

  1. What three components make up a selling price? In what units are these components commonly expressed?
  2. In what three ways are expenses and profits expressed?
  3. What is the relationship between net price and cost?

Example 4.2A – Setting a Price on Fashion in Dollars

Mary’s Boutique purchases a dress for resale at a cost of $23.67. The owner determines that each dress must contribute $5.42 to the expenses of the store. The owner also wants this dress to earn $6.90 toward profit. What is the regular selling price for the dress?

Answer: regular selling price for the dress? [latex]\rightarrow  S[/latex].

Conditions: unit cost of the dress [latex]C=\$ 23.67[/latex], unit expense  [latex]E=\$ 5.42[/latex],
unit profit [latex]P=\$ 6.90[/latex]

[latex]\text{selling price} =C+E+P= 23.67+5.42+6.90=\$ 35.99[/latex]

Therefore, Mary’s Boutique will set the regular price of the dress at $35.99.

Example 4.2B – Setting the Price Using Percentage of Cost

John’s Discount Store just completed a financial analysis. The company determined that expenses average 20% of the product cost and profit averages 15% of the product cost. John’s Discount Store purchases Chia Pets from its supplier for an MSRP of $19.99 less a trade discount of 45%. What will be the regular selling price for the Chia Pets?

Answer: the regular selling price for the Chia pets?

[latex]\begin{align*} \text{reg. selling price}&=\overset{?}{\text{cost}}+\overset{?}{\text{expenses}}+\overset{?}{\text{profit}}\\ \\ &=\overset{?}{\text{cost}}+0.2(\overset{?}{\text{cost}})+0.15(\overset{?}{\text{cost}})\\ \\ &=1.35\cdot(\overset{?}{\text{cost}})\\ \\ &=1.35\cdot\text{MSRP}(1-(\text{trade disc. rate}))\\ \\ &=1.35\cdot 19.99\cdot (1-0.45)\\ \\ &=\$14.84 \end{align*}[/latex]

Therefore, John’s Discount Store will sell the Chia Pet for $14.84.

A circle diagram illustrating the price components for a Chia Pet. The circle represents the selling price of $14.84. The blue portion of the circle represents the cost ($10.99.) The red portion of the circle represents expenses ($2.20.) The green portion of the circle represents profit ($1.65.)

Example 4.2C – Setting the Price Using Percentage of Selling Price

Based on last year’s results, Benthal Appliance learned that its expenses average 30% of the regular selling price. It wants a 25% profit based on the selling price. If Benthal Appliance purchases a fridge for $1,200, what is the regular unit selling price?

Plan:
You are looking for the regular unit selling price for the fridge, or [latex]S[/latex].

Understand:
Step 1: The cost, expenses, and profit for the fridge are known:

[latex]\begin{align*} E &= 30\%\textrm{ of S, or }0.3S\\ P &= 25\%\textrm{ of S, or }0.25S\\ C &= $1,200.00\\ \end{align*}[/latex]

Step 2: Apply Formula 4.5.

Perform:
Step 2:

[latex]\begin{align*} S&=$ 1,200.00+0.3S+0.25S\\ S&=$ 1,200+0.55S\\ S-0.55S&=$ 1,200.00\\ 0.45S&=$ 1,200.00\\ S&=$ 2,666.67\\ \end{align*}[/latex]

Present
Benthal Appliance should set the regular selling price of the fridge at $2,666.67.

A circle diagram illustrating price components for a fridge. The circle represents the regular selling price ($2,666.67.) The blue portion of the circle represents cost ($1,200.00). The red portion of the circle represents expenses [0.3($2,666.67) = $800.00.] The green portion of the circle represents profit [0.25($2,666.67) = $666.67]

Example 4.2D – Using Selling Price to Figure Out the Cost

If a company knows that its profits are 15% of the selling price and expenses are 30% of cost, what is the cost of an MP3 player that has a regular selling price of $39.99?

Answer:

Task:
You are looking for the cost of the MP3 player, or [latex]C[/latex].

Condition(s):

selling price = cost + expenses + profit

So,

[latex]\begin{align*} &\overset{\checkmark}{\text{selling price}}=\overset{?}{\text{cost}}+\overset{?}{\text{expenses}}+\overset{?}{\text{profit}}\\\\ &\overset{\checkmark}{\text{selling price}}=\overset{?}{\text{cost}}+0.3(\overset{?}{\text{cost}})+0.15(\overset{\checkmark}{\text{selling price}})\\\\ \Rightarrow &\text{selling price}-0.15(\text{selling price})=\text{cost}+0.3(\text{cost})\\\\ \Rightarrow &0.85(\text{selling price})=1.3(\text{cost})\\\\ \Rightarrow &\text{cost}=\frac{0.85}{1.3}(\text{selling price})\\\\ \Rightarrow &\text{cost}=\frac{0.85}{1.3}\cdot 39.99 = \$26.15 \end{align*}[/latex]

Therefore, the cost of the MP3 Player is $26.15.

A circle diagram illustrating price components of an MP3 player. The circle represents the regular selling price ($39.99.) The blue portion of the circle represents cost ($26.15.) The red portion of the circle represents expenses [0.3($26.15) = $7.84.] The green portion of the circle represents profit [0.13($39.99) = $6.00.]

Example 4.2E – Determining Profitability

Peak of the Market considers setting the regular unit selling price of its strawberries at $3.99 per kilogram. If it purchases these strawberries from the farmer for $2.99 per kilogram and expenses average 40% of product cost, does Peak of the Market make any money?

Answer: profit = ? ([latex]P =?[/latex])

[latex]\begin{align*} \overset{S}{\text{selling price}} &= \overset{C}{\text{cost}}+\overset{E}{\text{expenses}}+\overset{P}{\text{profit}}\\ P&=\overset{\checkmark}{S}-\overset{\checkmark}{C}-\overset{?}{E}\\ P&=S-C-0.4C\\ &=3.99-2.99-0.4(3.99)\\ &=-$ 0.20\\ \end{align*}[/latex]

The negative sign on the profit means that Peak of the Market would take a loss of $0.20 per kilogram if it sells the strawberries at $3.99. Unless Peak of the Market has a marketing reason or sound business strategy for doing this, the company should reconsider its pricing.

Calculating the Markup Dollars

Most companies sell more than one product, each of which has different price components with varying costs, expenses, and profits. Can you imagine trying to compare 50 different products, each with three different components? You would have to juggle 150 numbers! To make merchandising decisions more manageable and comparable, many companies combine expenses and profit together into a single quantity, either as a dollar amount or a percentage. This section focuses on the markup as a dollar amount.

One of the most basic ways a business simplifies its merchandising is by adding the dollar amounts of its expenses and profits, as expressed in the basic selling price formula below:

Markup amount

[latex]\begin{align*} \text{markup amount}&=\text{expenses}+\text{profit}\\ \\ M& =E+P \end{align*}[/latex]

[latex]M$[/latex] is Markup amount: Markup is taking the cost of a product and converting it into a selling price. The markup amount represents the dollar amount difference between the cost and the selling price.

[latex]E[/latex] is Expenses: The expenses associated with the product.

[latex]P[/latex] is Profit: The profit earned when the product sells.

Note that since the markup amount ([latex]M[/latex]) represents the expenses ([latex]E[/latex]) and profit ([latex]P[/latex]) combined, you can substitute the variable for markup amount instead of expenses plus profit to calculate the regular selling price.

Selling price using markup

[latex]S=C+M[/latex]

[latex]S[/latex] is Selling price: The regular selling price of the product.

[latex]C[/latex] is Cost: The amount of money needed to acquire or manufacture the product. If the product is being acquired, the cost is the same amount as the net price paid.

[latex]M[/latex] is Markup Amount: This is the single value that represents the total of the expenses and profit.

Recall from Example 4.2D that the MP3 player’s expenses are $7.84, the profit is $6.00, and the cost is $26.15. Here is how we would calculate the markup amount and the selling price.

markup:

[latex]\text{markup}=\text{expenses}+\text{profit}=7.84+6.00=\$ 13.84[/latex]

selling price:

[latex]\text{selling price}=\text{cost}+\text{markup}= 26.15+ 13.84=\$ 39.99[/latex]

You might have already noticed that many of the formulas in this chapter are interrelated. The same variables appear numerous times but in different ways. To help visualize the relationship between the various formulas and variables, many students have found it helpful to create a markup chart, as shown below.

Graphical breakdown of markup-related relationships with selling price, expenses and cost

This chart demonstrates the relationships between selling price, cost, expenses, profit and markup amount. It is evident that the selling price (the green line) consists of cost, expenses, and profit (the red line); or it can consist of cost and the markup amount (the blue line). The markup amount on the blue line consists of the expenses and profit on the red line.

Example 4.2F – Markup as a Dollar Amount

A cellular retail store purchases an iPhone with an MSRP of $779 less a trade discount of 35% and volume discount of 8%. The store sells the phone at the MSRP.
a. What is the markup amount?
b. If the store knows that its expenses are 20% of the cost, what is the store’s profit?

Answer:
a. markup amount =?

Conditions: list price (MSRP), trade discount, volume discount, selling price (MSRP)

[latex]\begin{align*} &\text{selling price}=\text{cost}+\text{markup}\\ \Rightarrow \text{markup}&=\overset{\checkmark}{\text{selling price}}-\overset{?}{\text{cost}}\\ \\ &=\text{selling price}\\ &\ \ \ -(\text{list price})(1-\text{trade disc. rate})(1-\text{volume disc. rate})\\ \\ &= 779-779(1-0.35)(1-0.08)\\ \\ &=\$313.16 \end{align*}[/latex]

b. profit = ?

Conditions: expenses = 20% of cost

[latex]\begin{align*} \text{markup}&=\text{expenses}+\text{profit}\\ \\ \Rightarrow \text{profit}&=\overset{\checkmark}{\text{markup}}-\overset{?}{\text{expenses}}\\ \\ &=\text{markup}-0.2(\text{cost})\\ \\ &=\text{markup}-0.2(\text{list price})(1-\text{trade disc.rate})(1-\text{vol. disc. rate})\\ \\ &=313.16-0.2(779)(1-0.35)(1-0.08)\\ \\ &=\$219.99\\ \end{align*}[/latex]
The markup amount for the iPhone is $313.16. When the store sells the phone for $779.00, its profit is $219.99.

Pie chart breaking down selling price of the iPhone

Calculating the Markup Percent

It is important to understand markup in terms of the actual dollar amount; however, it is more common in business practice to calculate the markup as a percentage. There are three benefits to converting the markup dollar amount into a percentage:

  1. Easy comparison of different products having vastly different price levels and costs. Markup rate can help you see how each product contributes toward the financial success of the company. For example, if a chocolate bar has a 50¢ markup included in a selling price of $1, while a car has a $1,000 markup included in a selling price of $20,000, it is difficult to compare the profitability of these items. If these numbers were expressed as a percentage of the selling price such that the chocolate bar has a 50% markup and the car has a 5% markup, it is clear that more of every dollar sold for chocolate bars goes toward list profitability.
  2. Simplified translation of costs into a regular selling price—a task that must be done for each product, making it helpful to have an easy formula, especially when a company carries hundreds, thousands, or even tens of thousands of products. For example, if all products are to be marked up by 50% of cost, an item with a $100 cost can be quickly converted into a selling price of $150.
  3. An increased understanding of the relationship between costs, selling prices, and the list profitability for any given product. For example, if an item selling for $25 includes a markup on selling price of 40% (which is $10), then you can determine that the cost is 60% of the selling price ($15) and that $10 of every $25 item sold goes toward list profits.

You can translate the markup dollars into a percentage using two methods, which express the amount either as a percentage of cost or as a percentage of selling price:

  • Method 1: Markup as a Percentage of Cost.
    This method expresses the markup rate using cost as the base. Many companies use this technique internally because most accounting is based on cost information. The result, known as the markup on cost percentage, allows a reseller to convert easily from a product’s cost to its regular unit selling price.
  • Method 2: Markup as a Percentage of Selling Price.
    This method expresses the markup rate using the regular selling price as the base. Many other companies use this method, known as the markup on selling price percentage, since it allows for quick understanding of the portion of the selling price that remains after the cost of the product has been recovered. This percentage represents the list profits before the deduction of expenses and therefore is also referred to as the list profit margin.

The markup rate on cost and markup rate on selling price are calculated using the relationships below:

Markup rate on cost

[latex]\begin{align*} \text{markup rate on cost}&=\frac{\text{markup amount}}{\text{cost}}\\ \\ m_C&=\frac{M}{C}\\ \\ &=\frac{M}{C}\cdot 100\% \end{align*}[/latex]

[latex]m_C[/latex] is the markup rate on cost (or markup with respect to cost): This is the percentage rate by which the cost of the product needs to be increased to arrive at the selling price for the product.

[latex]M[/latex] is the markup amount: The total dollars of the expenses and the profits; this total is the difference between the cost and the selling price.

[latex]C[/latex] is the cost: The amount of money needed to acquire or manufacture the product. If the product is being acquired, the cost is the same amount as the net price paid.

× 100 is Percent Conversion: The markup on cost is always a percentage.

Markup rate on selling price

[latex]\begin{align*} \text{markup rate on selling price}&=\frac{\text{markup amount}}{\text{selling price}}\\ \\ m_S&=\frac{M}{S}\\ \\ &=\frac{M}{S}\cdot 100\% \end{align*}[/latex]

[latex]m_S[/latex] is the markup rate on selling price (or markup with respect to price): This is the percentage of the selling price that remains available as list profits after the cost of the product is recovered.

[latex]M[/latex] is the markup amount: The total dollars of the expenses and the profits; this total is the difference between the cost and the selling price.

[latex]S[/latex] is the selling price: The regular selling price of the product.

× 100 is the percent conversion: The markup on selling price is always a percentage.

Continuing to work with Example 4.2D, recall that the cost of the MP3 player is $26.15, the markup amount is $13.84, and the selling price is $39.99. Calculate both markup percentages.

Step 1: The known variables are

[latex]\begin{align*} C &= $26.15\\ M &= $13.84\\ S &= $39.99\\ \end{align*}[/latex]

Step 2: To calculate the markup rate on cost:

[latex]\begin{align*}m_C\%=\frac{13.84}{26.15}=52.9254\%\end{align*}[/latex]

In other words, you must add 52.9254% of the cost on top of the unit cost to arrive at the regular unit selling price of $39.99.

To calculate the markup rate on selling price:

[latex]\begin{align*}m_S\%=\frac{13.84}{39.99}=34.6087\%\end{align*}[/latex]

In other words, 34.6087% of the selling price represents list profits after the business recovers the $26.15 cost of the MP3 player.

Merchandising involves many variables. Nine formulas have been established so far, and a few more are yet to be introduced. Though you may feel bogged down by all of these formulas, just remember that you have encountered most of these merchandising concepts since you were very young and that you interact with retailers and pricing every day. This chapter merely formalizes calculations you already perform on a daily basis, whether at work or at home. The calculation of discounts is no different than going to Walmart and finding your favourite CD on sale. You know that when a business sells a product, it has to recoup the cost of the product, pay its bills, and make some money. And you have worked with percentages since elementary school.

Do not get stuck in the formulas. Think about the concept presented in the question. Change the scenario of the question and put it in the context of something more familiar. Ultimately, if you really have difficulties then look at the variables provided and cross-reference them to the merchandising formulas. Your goal is to find formulas in which only one variable is unknown. These formulas are solvable. Then ask yourself, “How does knowing that new variable help solve any other formula?”

You do not need to get frustrated. Just be systematic and relate the question to what you already know.

Sometimes you need to convert the markup on cost percentage to a markup on selling price percentage, or vice versa. Two shortcuts allow you to convert easily from one to the other:

[latex]\begin{align*} m_C&=\frac{m_S}{1-m_S}\\ \\ m_S&=\frac{m_C}{1+m_C}\\ \end{align*}[/latex]

Notice that these formulas are very similar. How do you remember whether to add or subtract in the denominator? In normal business situations, the [latex]m_C[/latex] is always larger than the [latex]m_S[/latex]. Therefore, if you are converting one to the other you need to identify whether you want the percentage to become larger or smaller.

  • To calculate [latex]m_C[/latex], you want a larger percentage. Therefore, make the denominator smaller by subtracting [latex]m_S[/latex] from 1.
  • To calculate [latex]m_S[/latex], you want a smaller percentage. Therefore, make the denominator larger by adding [latex]m_C[/latex] to 1.

Give It Some Thought:

Answer the following true/false questions.

4. The markup on selling price percentage can be higher than 100%.

5. The markup dollar amount can be more than the selling price.

6. The markup on cost percentage can be higher than 100%.

7. The markup on cost percentage in most business situations is higher than the markup on selling price percentage.

8. If you know the markup on cost percentage and the cost, you can calculate a selling price.

9. If you know the markup on selling price percentage and the cost, you can calculate a selling price.

Example 4.2G – Markup as a rate

A large national retailer wants to price a Texas Instruments BAII Plus calculator at the MSRP of $39.99. The retailer can acquire the calculator for $17.23.
a. What is the markup rate on cost?
b. What is the markup rate on selling price?

Answer:

a. markup rate on cost  =?

Conditions: selling price = $39.99, cost = $17.23

[latex]\begin{align*} \text{markup rate on cost}&=\frac{\overset{?}{\text{markup amount}} }{\underset{\checkmark}{\text{cost}}}\\ \\ &=\frac{\text{selling price}-\text{cost}}{\text{cost}}\\ \\ &=\frac{39.99-17.23}{17.23}\\ \\ &=1.320952=132.0952\% \end{align*}[/latex]

b. markup rate on selling price  =?

Conditions: selling price = $39.99, cost = $17.23

[latex]\begin{align*} \text{markup rate on selling price}&=\frac{\overset{?}{\text{markup amount}} }{\underset{\checkmark}{\text{selling price}}}\\ \\ &=\frac{\text{selling price}-\text{cost}}{\text{selling price}}\\ \\ &=\frac{39.99-17.23}{39.99}\\ \\ &=0.569142=56.9142\% \end{align*}[/latex]

The markup on cost percentage is 132.0952%. The markup on selling price percentage is 56.9142%.

Break-Even Pricing

In running a business, you must never forget the “bottom line.” In other words, if you fully understand how your products are priced, you will know when you are making or losing money. Remember, if you keep losing money you will not stay in business for long! 2% of new businesses will not make it past their first year, and 37% fail in their first five years. This number becomes even more staggering with a 57% failure rate within the first decade.[1] Do not be one of these statistics! With your understanding of markup, you now know what it takes to break even in your business. Break-even means that you are earning no profit, but you are not losing money either. Your profit is zero.

If the regular unit selling price must cover three elements—cost, expenses, and profit—then the regular unit selling price must exactly cover your costs and expenses when the profit is zero. In other words,:

[latex]\text{break-even selling price per unit}=\text{cost per unit}+\text{expenses per unit}[/latex]

This is not a new formula. It just summarizes that at break-even there is no profit or loss, so the profit ( [latex]P[/latex]) is eliminated from the formula.

Recall Example 4.2D that the cost of the MP3 player is $26.15 and expenses are $7.84.

Therefore

[latex]\text{break-even price}=26.15+ 7.84=\$ 33.99[/latex]

This means that if the MP3 player is sold for anything more than $33.99, it is profitable; if it is sold for less, then the business does not cover its costs and expenses and takes a loss on the sale.

Example 4.2H – Knowing Your Break-Even Price

John is trying to run an eBay business. His strategy has been to shop at local garage sales and find items of interest at a great price. He then resells these items on eBay. On John’s last garage sale shopping spree, he only found one item—a Nintendo Wii that was sold to him for $100. John’s vehicle expenses (for gas, oil, wear/tear, and time) amounted to $40. eBay charges a $2.00 insertion fee, a flat fee of $2.19, and a commission of 3.5% based on the selling price less $25. What is John’s minimum list price for his Nintendo Wii to ensure that he at least covers his expenses?

Answer: break-even selling price = ?

Conditions: selling price = cost + expenses

cost = $100.00, vehicle expenses = $40.00, insertion expenses = $2.00, flat fee expense= $2.19, commission expense = 3.5% on selling price less $25.00

[latex]\begin{align*} \overset{S_{BE}}{\text{b-e selling price}}&=\overset{C\checkmark}{\text{cost}}+\overset{E_{vehicle}\checkmark}{\text{vehicle expenses}}+ \overset{E_{insertion}\checkmark}{\text{insertion expenses}}\\ &\ \ \ \ +\underset{E_{flat}\checkmark}{\text{flat fee expense}}+\underset{?}{\text{commission expense}}\\ \\ \Rightarrow S_{BE}&={C}+{E_{vehicle}}+{E_{insertion}}+{E_{flat}}+0.035(S_{BE}-25)\\ \\ \Rightarrow S_{BE}&=100+40+2+2.19+0.035S_{BE}-0.875 \\ &\Rightarrow S_{BE}-0.035S_{BE}=100+40+2+2.19+0.035-0.875\\ \\ &\Rightarrow 0.965S_{BE}=143.315\\ \\ &\Rightarrow S_{BE}=148.51 \end{align*}[/latex]

Therefore, at a price of $148.51, John would cover all of his costs and expenses but realize no profit or loss. Therefore, $148.51 is his minimum price.

Give It Some Thought Answers

  1. Cost, expenses, and profit. They are expressed either per unit or as a total.
  2. A specific dollar amount, a percentage of cost, or a percentage of the selling price.
  3. The net price paid for a product is the same as the cost of the product.
  4. False. The markup amount is a portion of the selling price and therefore is less than 100%.
  5. False. The markup amount plus the cost equals the selling price. It must be less than the selling price.
  6. True. A cost can be doubled or tripled (or increased even more) to reach the price.
  7. True. The base for markup on cost percentage is smaller, which produces a larger percentage.
  8. True. You could combine formulas to arrive at the selling price.
  9. True. You could convert the [latex]m_S[/latex] to a [latex]m_C[/latex] and solve as in the previous question.

Section Exercises – after the reading

Work on section 4.2 exercises in Fundamentals of Business Math Exercises after reading this section. Discuss your solutions with your peers and/or course instructor.

You may consult answers to select exercises: Fundamentals of Business Math Exercises – Select Answers


  1. Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. Canadian New Firms: Birth and Survival Rates over the Period 2002–2014, May 2018. https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/061.nsf/eng/h_03075.html#section-3.1

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Fundamentals of Business Math Copyright © 2021 by Ana Duff, adapted from work by J. Olivier and D. Lippman is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book