2.3 Ratios, Proportions, and Prorating
You and your business partner have a good problem: Consumers are snapping up packets of your new eucalyptus loganberry facial scrub as fast as you can produce them. Each packet of the scrub contains 600 mg of loganberry extract and 80 mg of eucalyptus oil, as well as water and clay and other ingredients. Ratios represent a mathematical concept that is invaluable in understanding the relationship among different quantities, such as how much of each ingredient you need.
You have no trouble obtaining the water and clay, but the loganberry extract and eucalyptus oil are in short supply because of poor weather. In any time period, your suppliers can provide seven times as much loganberry extract as eucalyptus oil. To figure out which ingredient is limiting your production, you need proportions.
Sometimes you need to relate a proportion to the total of the quantities. This requires prorating, also called allocation, skills. For example, once your business has grown, you start using a production line, which follows the common practice of producing more than one product. The papaya facial scrub you have introduced recently and the eucalyptus loganberry scrub require the same amount of production time. Your equipment capacity is 1,000 units per day. How many units of each type of scrub must you produce to meet market demand in the ratio of nine to two?
Years later, you are splitting the profits of your business partnership in proportion to each partner’s total investment. You invested $73,000, while your partner invested $46,000. With total profits of $47,500, what is your share?
Understanding the relationships among various quantities and how the components relate to an overall total emphasizes the need for understanding ratios, proportions, and prorating.
What Is a Ratio?
A ratio is a fixed relationship between two or more quantities, amounts, or sizes of similar or different nature. For a ratio to exist, all terms involved in the ratio must be nonzero. Examine the criteria of this definition more closely:
- There Must Be Two or More Quantities. A ratio does not exist if only one quantity is involved. For example, the fuel tank on your Mustang takes 60 liters of gasoline. This is not a ratio, as there is no relationship to any other quantity, amount, or size. On the other hand, if you compare your fuel tank to the fuel tank of your friend’s Hummer, you now have two quantities involved and could say that her fuel tank has twice the capacity of yours.
- Units of measurement for each quantity in the ratio must be clear and remain consistent. Ideally, the quantities of the same type should use the same unit of measurement. If the units of measurement are the same for all terms in the ratio, we don’t have to state them. However, if they are different, say 2 cups of flour to 1.5 teaspoons of baking powder, we must state that 2 refers to cups, and 1.5 refers to teaspoons.
- All Terms Must Be Nonzero. The numbers that appear in a ratio are called the terms of the ratio. If we have a recipe with four cups of flour to one cup of sugar, there are two terms: four and one. If any term is zero, then the quantity, amount, or size does not exist. For example, if the recipe called for four cups of flour to zero cups of sugar, there is no sugar! Therefore, every term must have some value other than zero.
Let’s continue using the example of four cups of flour to one cup of sugar. Business ratios are expressed in five common formats, as illustrated in the table below.
Format |
Ratio Example |
Interpretation |
To |
4 to 1 |
four cups of flour to one cup of sugar |
: (colon) |
4:1 |
four cups of flour to one cup of sugar |
Fraction |
[latex]\frac{4}{1}[/latex] |
four cups of flour per one cup of sugar |
Decimal |
4 |
four times as much flour as sugar |
Percent |
400% |
flour is 400% of sugar |
All of these formats work well when there are only two terms in the ratio. If there are three or more terms, ratios are best expressed in the colon format. For example, if the recipe called for four parts of flour to one part of sugar to two parts of chocolate chips, the ratio is 4 : 1 : 2. The fraction, decimal, and percent forms do not work with three or more terms.
Simplification and Reduction of Ratios
When a ratio is used to express a relationship between different variables, it must be easy to understand and interpret. Sometimes when you set up a ratio initially, the terms are difficult to comprehend. For example, what if the recipe called for 62½ parts flour to 25 parts sugar? That is not very clear. Expressing the same ratio another way, you can say the recipe requires 5 parts flour to 2 parts sugar. Note how the relationship is clearer in the latter expression. Either way, though, both ratios mean the same thing; in decimal format this ratio is expressed as a value of 2.5. This is similar to fractions being expressed in higher and lower terms. We now apply the same knowledge to ratios to make the relationship as clear as possible.
When you simplify ratios to lower terms, remember two important rules when working with rations:
- What you do to one term in the ratio, you must do to the other. Recall that ratios of two terms can be represented as fractions. Also recall that, when rewriting fractions into different but equivalent forms, the operation applied to the numerator must also be applied to the denominator, and vice versa. The same applies to ratios. In other words, if a mathematical operation is performed on a term in a ratio, the same operation must also be performed on every other term in the ratio. If this rule is violated then the relationship between the terms is broken, i.e., the resulting ratio is not the same as the original ratio.
- Integer terms are ideal. Integers are easier to understand than decimals and fractions. When rewriting ratios into equivalent forms, aim to apply the operations that will result in every term being an integer.
Helpful guidelines in rewriting ratios
- Rewrite all terms written as mixed numbers, if any, as fractions.
- Clear all fractions by multiplying every term with the common denominator.
- If there are decimal numbers in the ratio, multiply all terms in the ratio with a large enough power of 10 (10, 100, 1000, …) to convert all decimal terms to integers.
- If there is a common integer factor to all terms in the ratio, divide all terms by the greatest common factor, to bring the ratio to lowest terms. If the greatest common factor is not easily seen, divide by common integer factors in multiple steps, until there is no more common integer factors (other than 1).
Important Notes
To reduce the ratio to lowest terms, one must be able to factor each term, and for that one must know the multiplication tables. However, there are a few simple tricks that we can use to check if a number is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, or 10:
- A number is divisible by 2 if it is even, i.e., it ends in 0, 2, 4, 6 or 8. (example: 2137886 is divisible by 2 because it ends with an even number, and 2137887 is not divisible by 2 because it does not end with an even number)
- A number is divisible by 3 if the sum of its digits is divisible by 3. (example: 2137887 is divisible by 3 because 2+1+3+7+8+8+7=36 is divisible by 3, but 2137886 is not divisible by 3 because 2+1+3+7+8+8+6=35 is not divisible by 3)
- A number is divisible by 4 if the last two digits of the number make a number that is divisible by 4. (example: 2137884 is divisible by 4 because 84 is divisible by 4, but 2137885 is not divisible by 4 because 85 is not divisible by 4)
- A number is divisible by 5 if it ends in 0 or 5.
- A number is divisible by 6 if it is divisible by 2 and 3, i.e., it is even and its digits add up to a number divisible by 3.
- A number is divisible by 9 if its digits add up to a number divisible by 9.
- A number is divisible by 10 if it ends in 0.
Example 2.3 A: Reducing Ratios to Lowest Terms
Reduce the following ratios to their lowest terms:
a. 49:21
b. 0.33:0.066
c. [latex]\frac {9}{2} : \frac {3} {11}[/latex]
d. [latex]5\frac {1}{8} : 6\frac {7}{8}[/latex]
Answer:
a. [latex]49:21=\frac{49}{7}:\frac{21}{7}=7:3[/latex]
b. [latex]0.33:0.066=(0.33)(1000):(0.066)(1000)=330:66=\frac{330}{6}:\frac{66}{6}=55:11=\frac{55}{11}:\frac{11}{11}=5:1[/latex]
c. [latex]\frac {9}{2} : \frac {3} {11}=22\left(\frac{9}{2}\right):22\left(\frac {3} {11}\right)=99:6=\frac{99}{3}:\frac{6}{3}=33:2[/latex]
d. [latex]5\frac {1}{8} : 6\frac {7}{8}=\frac{41}{8}:\frac{55}{8}=8\left(\frac{41}{8}\right):8\left(\frac{55}{8}\right)=41:440[/latex]
Proportions
Knowing the relationship between specific quantities is helpful, but what if the quantity you are considering does not match the specific quantity expressed in the existing ratio? For example, you know you have to maintain a ratio of 2 administrators to 5 clerks, and you are looking at hiring 30 clerks. How does that reflect on the number of administrators you require to maintain the given ratio?
A proportion is a statement of equality between two ratios. For example, the following statement is a proportion because it is a statement of equality between two equal ratios:
[latex]2:3=200:300[/latex]
Just as we have both algebraic expressions and algebraic equations, there are ratios and proportions. And just as in algebraic expressions and algebraic equations, we can have terms that involve unknowns, or variables. Because proportions are equations, if they involve an unknown variable, we may be able to solve for that variable using the algebraic operations on equations as we have before.
With algebraic expressions, only simplification was possible. When the expression was incorporated into an algebraic equation, you solved for an unknown. The same is true for ratios and proportions. With ratios, only simplification is possible. Proportions allow you to solve for any unknown variable.
Let’s first work with algebraic proportions of two-term ratios and involving one unknown, without a context behind the underlying ratios.
Let’s consider a general proportion statement, where three quantities are known and one is unknown:
[latex]a:b=m:n[/latex]
We can rewrite this as
[latex]\frac{a}{b}=\frac{m}{n}[/latex]
By multiplying both sides with [latex]bn[/latex], we get
[latex]a\cdot n=b\cdot m[/latex]
We can now solve this equation for whichever quantity is the unknown.
Here is a shortcut to this process:
[latex]\underbrace{a:\underbrace{b=m}_{\underset{\displaystyle=}{\text{inside }\cdot\text{ inside}}}:n}_{{\text{outside }\cdot\text{ outside}}}\Rightarrow a\cdot n=b\cdot m[/latex]
Alternatively,
[latex]\Rightarrow \frac{a}{m}=\frac{b}{n}\Rightarrow a\cdot n=b\cdot m[/latex]
Example 2.3 B: Solving proportions with two ratio terms and one unknown
Solve the following proportions for the given unknown.
a. [latex]2:x=5:7.5[/latex]
b. [latex]\dfrac{2}{3}:5=1:\dfrac{t}{4}[/latex]
c. [latex]\dfrac{1}{4}:\dfrac{3}{5}m=\dfrac{5}{3}:\dfrac{7}{12}[/latex]
d. [latex]5:9=2p:5q[/latex], solve for [latex]q[/latex]
Answer:
a. [latex]\displaystyle 2:x=5:7.5\Rightarrow 2\cdot 7.5=x\cdot 5\Rightarrow \frac{15}{5}=x\Rightarrow x=3[/latex]
b. [latex]\displaystyle\frac{2}{3}:5=1:\frac{t}{4}\Rightarrow \frac{2}{3}\cdot \frac{t}{4}=5\cdot 1\Rightarrow \frac{1}{6}t=5\Rightarrow t=5\cdot 6=30[/latex]
c. [latex]\displaystyle\frac{1}{4}:\frac{3}{5}m=\frac{5}{3}:\frac{7}{12}\displaystyle\Rightarrow \frac{1}{4}\cdot \frac{7}{12}=\frac{3}{5}m\cdot \frac{5}{3}\Rightarrow \frac{7}{48}=m\Rightarrow m=\frac{7}{48}[/latex]
d. [latex]\displaystyle5:9=2p:5\overset{?}{q}\Rightarrow 5\cdot 5q=9\cdot 2p\Rightarrow 25q=18p\Rightarrow q=\frac{18}{25}p[/latex]
A proportion must adhere to three characteristics, including ratio criteria, order of terms, and number of terms.
- Characteristic #1: Ratio Criteria Must Be Met. By definition, a proportion is the equality between two ratios. If either the left side or the right side of the proportion fails to meet the criteria for being a ratio, then a proportion cannot exist.
- Characteristic #2: Same Order of Terms. The order of the terms on the left side of the proportion must be in the exact same order of terms on the right side of the proportion. For example, if your ratio is the number of MP3s to CDs to DVDs, then your proportion is set up as follows:
MP3 : CD : DVD = MP3 : CD : DVD
- Characteristic #3: Same Number of Terms. The ratios on each side must have the same number of terms such that every term on the left side has a corresponding term on the right side. A proportion of MP3 : CD : DVD = MP3 : CD is not valid since the DVD term on the left side does not have a corresponding term on the right side.
When you work with proportions, the mathematical goal is to solve for an unknown quantity or quantities. In order to solve any proportion, follow these guidelines:
If there are only two terms on each side of the proportion and only one unknown, rewrite the proportion as a linear equation and solve for the unknown.
Note that if there is more than one unknown, the proportion is not going to be uniquely solvable, i.e., there will be infinitely many possibilities for the values of the unknown, described through a relationship arrived to by solving for one of them in terms of the other.
For example, [latex]x : 5 = y : 10[/latex] is not a uniquely solvable proportion since the proportion ratios have only two terms but there are two unknowns, [latex]x[/latex] and [latex]y[/latex]. If we attempt to solve it we will get [latex]10x=5y[/latex], which can be simplified as [latex]2x=y[/latex]. This will be true for any pair of values [latex]x[/latex] and [latex]y[/latex] where [latex]y[/latex] is twice as large as [latex]x[/latex].
If there are more than two terms in the ratios in the proportion, extract a two-term ratio proportion that has only one unknown.
For example, if you have [latex]3 : x : 6 = 9 : 4 : z[/latex], you can use [latex]3 : x = 9 : 4[/latex] to solve for [latex]x[/latex] and [latex]3 : 6 = 9 : z[/latex] to solve for [latex]z[/latex].
Things To Watch Out For
When working with proportions that have more than two terms in the ratios and extracting a two-term ratio proportion, you must always pick terms from the same positions on both sides of the proportion. Otherwise, you will violate the equality of the proportion, since the terms are no longer in the same order on both sides. For example, consider the proportion [latex]6 : 5 : 4 = 18 : 15 : y[/latex]. You cannot select the first and third terms on the left side while selecting the second and third terms on the right side. In other words, [latex]6 : 4 \neq 15 : y[/latex] since 1st term : 3rd term ≠ 2nd term : 3rd term.
Give It Some Thought
- Some of the following proportions violate the characteristics of proportions or are not uniquely solvable. Examine each and determine if they are solvable and characteristics are met. If not, identify the problem.
a. [latex]4:7=6:y[/latex] | b. [latex]5:3=6:a:b[/latex] | c. [latex]6\ km:3\ m=2\ m:4\ km[/latex] |
d. [latex]6:k=18:12[/latex] | e. [latex]4:0=8:z[/latex] | f. [latex]9=p[/latex] |
g. [latex]4:7:10=d:e:f[/latex] | h. [latex]y:10:15=x:30:z[/latex] |
- In the following problem, which person properly executed the first step in solving proportions with more than two ratio terms?
Problem: Solve the following proportion: [latex]6 : 5 : 4 : 3 = x : y : z : 9[/latex] | ||
Person A: [latex]6 : 5 = x : y[/latex] | Person B: [latex]4 : 3 = y : 9[/latex] | Person C: [latex]4 : 3 = z : 9[/latex] |
Solutions:
- a. valid proportion set-up; b. not the same number of terms on each side; c. corresponding ratio terms are not in same units or terms are not in the same order; d. valid proportion set-up; e. zero cannot be part of a ratio; f. not a proportion because it is not comparing ratios; g. not uniquely solvable because there is no two-term ratio proportion with only one unknown; h. solvable uniquely for [latex]z[/latex] but there is no two-term ratio proportion with only [latex]x[/latex] or [latex]y[/latex], so not uniquely solvable
- Person C did it right. Person A failed to isolate a variable, and different terms were extracted by Person B (3rd term : 4th term ≠ 2nd term : 4th term).
Example 2.3 C: Estimating Competitor Profits
A recent article reported that companies in a certain industry were averaging an operating profit of $23,000 per 10 full-time employees. A marketing manager wants to estimate the operating profitability for one of her company’s competitors, which employs 87 full-time workers. What is the estimated operating profit for that competitor?
Answer:
Task: competitor operating profit = ? [latex]\rightarrow x[/latex]
Conditions: [latex]\text{operating profit} : \text{# full time employees} = 23000:10[/latex]
[latex]\Rightarrow x:87=23000:10\Rightarrow 10x=87\cdot 23000\Rightarrow x=\frac{87\cdot 23000}{10}=200100[/latex]
Therefore, the estimated operating profit for the competitor is $200,100.
Prorating (or Allocations)
Ratios and proportions are commonly used in various business applications. But there will be numerous situations where your business must allocate limited funds across various divisions, departments, budgets, individuals, and so on.
In the opener to this section, one example discussed the splitting of profits with your business partner, where you must distribute profits in proportion to each partner’s total investment. You invested $73,000 while your partner invested $46,000. How much of the total profits of $47,500 should you receive?
The process of prorating or allocating is the process of taking of a total quantity and allocating or distributing it proportionally. In the above example, you must take the total profits of $47,500 and distribute it proportionally with your business partner based on the investment of each partner. The proportion is:
your investment : your partner’s investment = your profit share : your partner’s profit share
This proportion has two major concerns:
- You don’t know either of the terms on the right side. As per the rules of proportions, this makes the proportion not uniquely solvable.
- There is a piece of information from the situation that you didn’t use at all! What happened to the total profits of $47,500?
Every prorating situation involves a hidden term. This hidden term is usually the sum of all the other terms on the same side of the proportion and represents a total. In our case, it is the $47,500 of total profits. This quantity must be placed as an extra term on both sides of the proportion to create a proportion that can actually be solved. In other words, we can rewrite the above proportion as follows:
[latex]\begin{align*} &\text{your investment} : \text{your partner's investment }:\text{total investment}\\ &=\text{your profit share} : \text{your partner's profit share}:\text{ total profit} \end{align*}[/latex]
This then allows us to calculate both of the profit shares:
[latex]\begin{align*} &\overset{\checkmark}{\text{your investment}} :\overset{?}{\text{total investment}}=\overset{?}{\text{your profit share}} : \overset{\checkmark}{\text{ total profit}}\\ &\\ \Rightarrow &\overset{\checkmark}{\text{your investment}} :(\overset{\checkmark}{\text{your investment}}+\overset{\checkmark}{\text{your partner's investment}})=\overset{?}{\text{your profit share}} : \overset{\checkmark}{\text{ total profit}}\\ &\\ \Rightarrow &(\overset{\checkmark}{\text{your investment}}+\overset{\checkmark}{\text{your partner's investment}})\cdot (\overset{?}{\text{your profit share}})=(\overset{\checkmark}{\text{your investment}})\cdot(\overset{\checkmark}{\text{ total profit}})\\ &\\ \Rightarrow & \text{your profit share}=\frac{(\overset{\checkmark}{\text{your investment}})\cdot(\overset{\checkmark}{\text{ total profit}})}{(\underset{\checkmark}{\text{your investment}}+\underset{\checkmark}{\text{your partner's investment}})} \end{align*}[/latex]
Therefore,
[latex]\begin{align*} \text{your}&\text{ profit share}\\ &=\frac{(\text{your investment})}{(\text{your investment}+\text{your partner's investment})}\cdot(\text{ total profit})\\ &\\ & =(\text{your share in the investment})\cdot({\text{ total profit}})\\ \end{align*}[/latex]
Similarly,
[latex]\begin{align*} \text{your} &\text{ partner's profit share}\\ &=\frac{({\text{your partner's investment}})\cdot({\text{ total profit}})}{({\text{your investment}}+{\text{your partner's investment}})}\\ &\\ & =(\text{your partner's share in the investment})\cdot({\text{ total profit}})\\ \end{align*}[/latex]
Do you notice a potential strategy? We started with individual investment amounts and the total profit amount and determined that each partner’s share in the profit is equal to the product of the partner’s share in the investment and the total profit. This was not a coincidence. In fact, this can be generalized to any situation where an initial ratio is given and an amount is to be shared according to that ratio.
Here is the general approach:
Suppose you are a given a ratio [latex]x_1:x_2:\ldots:x_n[/latex] using which some given quantity [latex]q[/latex] must be distributed into [latex]n[/latex] quantities, call them [latex]q_i[/latex]. Then we can calculate each share of this quantity as follows:
[latex]\begin{align*} q_i&=(\text{share in the original ratio})\cdot (\text{given quantity})\\ &\\ &=\frac{x_i}{x_1+x_2+\ldots+x_n}\cdot q \end{align*}[/latex]
Prorating process
Prorating a quantity according to a ratio requires two fundamental steps: determining the share in the original ratio, then using this to determine the share in the given quantity:
- Set up the original ratio and simplify as much as possible.
- Calculate the share of each term in the ratio by dividing the term by the sum of all terms.
- Calculate the share of each term in the given quantity by multiplying the quantity with the share of the term in the original ratio.
For example, to solve the profit-splitting scenario discussed above, let [latex]y[/latex] represent your profit share and [latex]p[/latex] represent your partner’s share. Recall that the profits of $47,500 were to be shared according to the investment ratio of:
[latex]\text{your investment} : \text{your partner’s investment}=73000 : 46000[/latex]
This means that the total investment is [latex]73000 + 46000=\$119,000[/latex]
[latex]\begin{align*} \text{your share in the investment}&=\frac{\text{your investment}}{\text{total investment}}\\ &=\frac{73000}{119000}=\frac{73}{119} \end{align*}[/latex]
[latex]\begin{align*} \text{your partner's share in the investment}&=\frac{\text{your partner's investment}}{\text{total investment}}\\ &=\frac{46000}{119000}=\frac{46}{119} \end{align*}[/latex]
Therefore,
[latex]\begin{align*} y&=(\text{your share in the investment})\cdot(\text{profit})\\ &=\frac{73}{119}\cdot 47500=29138.66 \end{align*}[/latex]
and
[latex]\begin{align*} p&=(\text{your partner's share in the investment})\cdot(\text{profit})\\ &=\frac{46}{119}\cdot 47500=18361.34 \end{align*}[/latex]
So you will receive $29,138.66 of the total profits and your partner will receive $18,361.34.
Example 2.3 E: A Refund on Your Car Insurance Premiums
You paid your annual car insurance premium of $1,791 on a Ford Mustang GT. After five complete months, you decide to sell your vehicle and use the money to cover your school expenses. Assuming no fees or other deductions from your insurance agency, how much of your annual insurance premium should you receive as a refund?
Answer:
Task: 7-month refund on a 12-month premium = ? (7-month allocation?)
Condition: 5 : 7 monthly ratio, total payment $1,791
[latex]\text{refund} =\frac{7}{12}\cdot 1791=1044.75[/latex]
You should receive $1,044.75 in refund.
Example 3.3F: Distribution of Costs across Product Lines
An accountant is trying to determine the profitability of three different products manufactured by his company. Some information about each is below:
Chocolate | Wafers | Nougat | |
Direct Costs | $743,682 | $2,413,795 | $347,130 |
Although each product has direct costs associated with its manufacturing and marketing, there are some overhead costs (costs that cannot be assigned to any one product) that must be distributed. These amount to $721,150. A commonly used technique is to assign these overhead costs in proportion to the direct costs incurred by each product. What is the total cost (direct and overhead) for each product?
Answer:
Task: total cost (direct and overhead) for each of chocolate, wafers and nougat = ?
Conditions: Total cost = direct + overhead. Direct costs known, overhead costs not known.
overhead costs of $721,150 distributed according to direct costs ratio [latex]\rightarrow 743682:2413795:347130[/latex]
total direct costs: [latex]74368+2413795+347130=2835293[/latex]
Therefore:
[latex]\text{chocolate overhead cost share} = \frac{74368}{2835293}\cdot 721150=\$18,915.32[/latex]
[latex]\text{wafers overhead cost share} = \frac{2413795}{2835293}\cdot 721150=\$613,942.99[/latex]
[latex]\text{nougat overhead cost share} = \frac{347130}{2835293}\cdot 721150=\$88,291.69[/latex]
Hence,
[latex]\text{chocolate total cost share} = 743682+18915.32=\$762,591.32[/latex]
[latex]\text{wafers total cost share} = 2413795+613942.99=\$3,027,737.99[/latex]
[latex]\text{nougat total cost share} =347130+88291.69=\$435,421.69[/latex]
Exercises
Mechanics
For questions 1–4, reduce the ratios to their smallest terms.
- a. 66 : 12 b. 48 : 112 : 80 c. 24 : 36 : 84 : 108
- a. 7.2 : 6 b. 0.03 : 0.035 : 0.02 c. 0.27 : 0.18 : 0.51 : 0.15
- a. [latex]5 \frac{1}{4}:6[/latex] b. [latex]\frac{3}{2}:\frac{9}{5}:\frac{{21}}{{10}}[/latex] c. [latex]2 \frac{1}{8}: \frac{9}{8}: 3 \frac{3}{8}:1[/latex]
- a. [latex]\frac{8}{3}: \frac{5}{9}[/latex] b. [latex]\frac{5}{6}: \frac{1}{3}:2[/latex] c. [latex]\frac{1}{7}: \frac{1}{3}: \frac{1}{4};: \frac{1}{6}[/latex]
- Reduce the following ratios to the smallest term of one. Round to two decimals as needed. a. 48 : 53 b. 5 [latex]\frac{7}{8}: 2 \frac{3}{4}: 3 \frac{1}{{12}}[/latex] c. [latex]\frac{2}{3}: 11 \frac{1}{{11}}: 5 \frac{5}{9}: 2.08[/latex]
- Solve the following proportions for the unknown variable. Round to two decimals as needed.
- [latex]7 : 12 = 109 : y[/latex]
- [latex]3.23 : 4.07 : 2.12 = x : 55.9625 : 29.15[/latex]
- [latex]q:\frac{5}{3} = 13.75:25[/latex]
- Solve the following proportions for all of the unknown variables.
- [latex]\$12.15 : \$38.30 : r = x : \$59,184.53 : \$26,998.93[/latex]
- [latex]16 : 5 : 9 : 30 = g : h : i : \$397,767[/latex]
For questions 8 and 9, prorate the total as indicated by the ratio.
- Ratio = 3 : 2, Total = $11,368.25
- Ratio = 7 : 5 : 3, Total = $46,923.90
Applications
- EB Games sells gaming consoles. Last month, it sold $22,500 worth of Nintendo Wii consoles, $31,500 worth of Microsoft Xbox consoles, and $18,000 worth of Sony PlayStation consoles. Express the ratio of Wii to Xbox to PlayStation sales in its lowest terms.
- The manufacturing cost of a deluxe candle is made up of $2.40 in paraffin, $1.20 in dye, $1.60 in overhead, and $4.40 in direct labour. Express the ratio between these costs respectively in their lowest terms.
- If one Canadian dollar buys $1.0385 of US dollars, how much US money can you spend so that you do not exceed the maximum duty-free amount of $800 Canadian on your next US vacation?
- For every $100 of retail spending, the average Canadian spends approximately $19.12 at motor vehicle dealerships and $18.35 at grocery stores. If the average Canadian spends $49,766 per year on retail spending, how much more does a Canadian spend annually at motor vehicle dealerships than at grocery stores?
- Marina has a three-sevenths interest in a partnership. If she sells one-quarter of her interest for $8,250, what is the implied value of the partnership?
- You are making a punch for an upcoming party. The recipe calls for 2½ parts ginger ale to ⅘ parts grenadine to 1⅜ parts vodka. If your punch bowl can hold 8.5 litres, how much (in litres) of each ingredient is needed? Round the answers to two decimals as needed.
Challenge, Critical Thinking, & Other Applications
- A manufacturing facility requires one member of the board of directors for every 10 executives. There are five managers for every executive and eight workers for every manager. The average salary paid to directors is $105,000 along with $80,000 to executives, $55,000 to managers, and $30,000 to workers. If the facility has 1,383 employees, what is the total labour cost?
- It is common for strip mall owners to allocate to their tenants general overhead costs such as snow clearing, security, and parking lot maintenance in one of two ways. The first method involves allocating these costs on the basis of the square metres each tenant operates. The second method involves allocating these costs on the basis of the number of annual transactions made by each tenant. At Charleswood Square, there are three tenants. The 7-Eleven takes up 150 square metres, Tim Hortons takes up 235 square metres, and Quiznos takes up 110 square metres. Last year, 7-Eleven had 350,400 transactions, Tim Hortons had 657,000 transactions, and Quiznos had 197,100 transactions. Total overhead costs for Charleswood Square last year were $25,980. Determine which method of allocation each tenant would prefer and how much of a savings in percentage its preferred method would represent relative to the other allocation method.
- The average annual Canadian cellphone plan covers 780 minutes of voice time, 600 text messages, and 8 video messages with a total annual cost of $500.63. However, some Canadians are high-usage consumers and average 439 minutes per month.
- Assuming the same proportion of usage and that each component shares the cost equally on a per-unit basis, how many text messages and video messages do these high-usage Canadian consumers average per year? How much should they pay annually for their cellphone usage?
- A similar typical cellphone plan in the Netherlands has a total annual cost of $131.44. How much would a high-usage plan cost annually in the Netherlands?
- Procter & Gamble (P&G) is analyzing its Canadian sales by region: 23% of sales were on the West coast; 18% were in the Prairies, 45% were in central Canada, and 14% were in Atlantic Canada. Express and reduce the ratio of P&G’s respective sales to the smallest term of one. Round to two decimals.
- A company has 14 managers, 63 supervisors, and 281 workers. After a record profit year, the company wants to distribute an end-of-year bonus to all employees. Each worker is to get one share, each supervisor gets twice as many shares as workers, and each manager gets twice as many shares as supervisors. If the bonus to be distributed totals $1,275,000, how much does each manager, supervisor, and worker receive?
The Language of Business Mathematics
average A single number that represents the middle of a data set.
geometric average A typical value for a set of numbers that are meant to be multiplied together or are exponential in nature. This may take the form of a series of percent changes.
hidden term In prorating, this is the sum of all the other terms on the same side of the proportion and represents a total.
percent change An expression in percent form of how much any quantity changes from a starting period to an ending period.
proportion A statement of equality between two ratios.
prorating The process of taking a total quantity and allocating or distributing it proportionally.
rate of change over time A measure of the percent change in a variable per time period.
ratio A fixed relationship between two or more quantities, amounts, or sizes of a similar nature where all terms are nonzero.
simple average An average where each piece of data shares the same level of importance and frequency but does not represent percent changes or numbers that are intended to be multiplied with each other.
terms of the ratio The numbers appearing in a ratio.
weighted average An average where not all pieces of data share the same level of importance or they do not occur with the same frequency; the data cannot represent percent changes or numbers that are intended to be multiplied with each other.
The Formulas You Need to Know
Symbols Used
∆% = percent change
∑ = summation symbol, which means you add everything up
GAvg = geometric average
n = a count of something, whether a total number of periods or a total quantity
New = the value that a quantity has become; the number that is being compared
Old = the value that a quantity used to be; the number to compare to
RoC = rate of change per time period
SAvg = simple average
x = any individual piece of data
w = weighting factor
WAvg = weighted average