7.1 War on Drugs & Decriminalization

When you purchase a coffee, have you ever wondered why it is accessible to anyone, though we know caffeine has a biological impact on the brain and body?  Have you ever thought about why tobacco products, marijuana, alcohol, or even your prescription medicines are less accessible and asked who made these decisions?  We will start by exploration of substances and laws.

There is little disagreement that there is an international “war on drugs;” and yet the war on drugs has resulted in the criminalization, stigmatization and increased health harms of people who use substances(¹⁾. A growing number of people in the political world agree; “the global war on drugs has failed, with devastating consequences for individuals and societies around the world…fundamental reforms in national and global drug control policies are urgently needed” ⁽²⁾.  While the United Nations General Assembly Special Session (UNGASS) and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) released a joint commitment in 2016 to address substance use, it still focused on the reduction of access.  There was, however, a recognition that substance use laws must shift to a more human rights and health promotion approach ^(3).

Given this backdrop, the question of whether our current substance use policies in Canada make sense must be asked. Experts in this field in Canada, from Gabor Mate to Donald MacPherson suggest the best approach our society could take is to decriminalize all substances and expand prevention, treatment, and harm reduction approaches that support various theories of use, ridding policy of moral models ⁽⁴⁾.

What is decriminalisation of drugs? by EMCDDA. Depenalisation, decriminalisation and legalisation. There is no universal agreement on these terms, but it is helpful to explore the different ideas that lie behind them if we are to understand better what they mean when they are used in the debate on different approaches to controlling the supply and use of drugs.⁽⁵⁾

Canada would not be the first country to decriminalize substances; “Czechia, the Netherlands, Portugal and Switzerland are among a handful of countries that have decriminalized drug use and possession for personal use and that have also invested in harm reduction programmes” ^(6).  How has decriminalization impacted these countries?

THE NETHERLANDS*

The Netherlands decriminalized substances in 1976 ⁽⁷⁾.  The strategy taken by the Netherlands was a four-pillar approach focusing on (i) preventing substance use and treating and rehabilitating people who use substances; (ii) reducing harm to users; (iii) diminishing public nuisance caused by people who use substances and; (iv) combatting the production and trafficking of drugs ⁽⁸⁾.  Under the Netherlands’ policy, people who use substances are not normally arrested for possession (excluding cocaine and heroin), but they must receive treatment if they are arrested for another reason ^(9). Traffickers are not arrested for selling small amounts of substances, but they may be arrested for selling them in large quantities.

The impacts of these changes resulted in marijuana, cocaine and heroin use dropping in the immediate years after it was decriminalized.  For example, data from the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction⁽¹⁰⁾ estimated approximately 1.4% of people participate in high-risk cannabis use (daily use).  In Canada, 7.9% of Canadians aged 15 and older report high-risk cannabis use⁽¹¹⁾.  In the Netherlands, there has been a decreasing trend in lifetime cannabis use among school-age children over the period 1999 to 2015 ⁽¹²⁾.  Data from the 2017 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study showed a decrease in the lifetime prevalence of cannabis use among students aged 12-16 years from 16.5 % in 2003 to 9.2 % in 2017 (¹³⁾.  In Canada, however, over 19% of those ages 15-17 used cannabis and nearly 20.0% of Canadians between the ages of 15-64 reported having used cannabis in the past three months ⁽¹⁴⁾.  In the Netherlands, while there has been an increase in the number of people who use opioids as experienced throughout Europe and North America, “no increase has been described in the number of opioid-related deaths” ⁽¹⁵⁾.  In 2017 in Canada according to the Canadian Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey, the prevalence of opioid use was 11.8% ⁽¹⁶⁾, and the number of opioid-related deaths increased by 2% from 2016 to 2020 with 24,626 apparent opioid toxicity deaths ⁽¹⁷⁾.  By offering a variety of supports to people who use substances, the Netherlands is saving lives.

PORTUGAL

In 2001, Portugal decriminalized small amounts of all substances.  This means the possession of substances for personal use and usage itself are still legally prohibited, but violations are exclusively administrative violations rather than criminal violations (18).

If someone is using substances, they are not charged with substance-related offences; rather anyone convicted of drug possession is sent for treatment, but the person may refuse treatment without any penalty ⁽¹⁹⁾.  Trafficking substances, on the other hand, are still illegal and can be prosecuted (²⁰⁾.  The Portuguese Government invested in treatment and evidence-based prevention programs ⁽²¹⁾. It recognized that treatment costs far less than imprisonment ⁽²²⁾.

In Portugal, the number of people struggling with substance use disorders who chose to access treatment increased, there are treatment facilities readily available and there have been reductions in problematic use, substance use-related harms and overcrowding in correctional facilities ⁽²³⁾.   In Canada, access to treatment is provided by various provincial governments but access can be difficult as wait times for treatment are lengthy.  For example, in Nova Scotia wait times for treatment, depending on the region, can last between 19-146 days (²⁴).

To learn more about Portugal’s approach please watch the video below.

How Portugal Successfully Tackled Its Drug Crisis. by CBC News: The National. Does the answer to B.C.’s overdose crisis lie in Portugal? Click here for the full story: http://cbc.ca/1.3962714 ⁽²⁵⁾

In Portugal, deaths related to substance use have reduced dramatically ⁽²⁶⁾, while in Canada, substance-related deaths have increased, and almost 96% of opioid-related overdose deaths were accidental (27).

Have a look at:   Opioid deaths map of Canada ^(28). 

Is Canada ready for decriminalization?  Listen to Susan Boyd explore the current “war on drugs” in Canada.

Susan Boyd: Colonial history and racial stereotypes are deeply entrenched in Canadian drug policy. by SFU Public Square. Susan Boyd, PhD — a distinguished professor in the University of Victoria’s Faculty of Human and Social Development who sits on the policy committee of the Canadian Drug Policy Coalition — spoke about the history of drug laws in Canada at A Tale of Two Crises: COVID-19 and the Overdose Emergency⁽²⁹⁾

The fears of many who saw Portugal as opening the door to an increase in substance use increased infections, and harm have not happened.  “Judging by every metric, decriminalization in Portugal has been a resounding success. It has enabled the Portuguese government to manage and control the drug problem far better than virtually every other Western country does” ⁽³⁰⁾.

Based on the statistics presented in the Netherlands and Portugal, laws and policies are best when they are evidence-based.

Attribution:

This Chapter is an adaptation of Exploring Substance Use in Canada by Julie Crouse is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.  Changes include adding material.

CHAPTER CREDIT

* Sections on The Netherlands and Portugal condensed and adapted from Unit 5.1 / Lessons from Other Societies in Drugs, Health & Behavior by Jacqueline Schwab. Content rewritten, references for stats added, chapter updated with Canadian content.