37 Week 9 – Brand Identity: Mark/Logo

Andrea Niosi

Developing a Mark for Your Brand

Marketers rely on branding to associate aspirations, attributes and values with functional products and services. The resulting relationships mean target audiences are drawn to the offer as much for its symbolic value as for its utility (Aaker, 1997)(van Osselaer & Janiszewski, 2001). Repeated pairing of branded collateral with positive contexts, colours and symbols create favourable and brand-specific connotations, to the point where a brand alone eventually evokes those associations and the benefits assumed to follow (Nord & Peter, 1980).

Consumers use physical brand attributes to construct imagery that they draw on and personalize; ultimately, brands help consumers to co-create an identity they project to others (Belk et al., 1982). Known as symbolic consumption, this process involves consumers forming relationships with brands, which they use to structure and create meaning in their lives (Gendall et al., 2012).

*

NO HUNGER BC logo, the "O" in NO has a carrot cut out in the middle.
In developing a mark for No Hunger BC, boldness and repeatability were key considerations. Primarily typographic logos offer a level of urgency and flexibility that can be beneficial for non-profit brands and campaigns. No Hunger BC is a food bank organization with a fresh food program, which is why the carrot icon was introduced to the wordmark. Even simple marks can convey a brand’s story and goals.

*

Brand Guidelines

Once a mark has been developed, you need to set up a set of brand guidelines that explains how the mark should be used in a variety of contexts. It’s a place to present the logo for you brand or campaign along with it’s variations. It’s helpful to create links to download the logo file so other members of your team can also access it. Files recommended are .jpg and .png files, as well as a .svg file which allows the mark to be opened and scaled as a vector.

*

Primary:

Download Link:
.png
.jpg
.svg

Reversed (White):

Download Link:
.png
.jpg
.svg

 

In some cases, you will utilize multiple iterations of a logo for different contexts. It’s important to also provide the files for those versions so your brand is presented the way you envisioned it.

In the below example, No Hunger BC created a secondary application of the logo to more prominently display their icon, which could be used for social media or other web/small scale applications. Download links are also provided for these files.

*

Icon with Wordmark:

Download Link:
.png
.jpg
.svgReversed (White):

Download Link:
.png
.jpg
.svg

 

If you have more iterations of your logo, you can continue to list them. Just be sure that you’re clear on the contexts they’re supposed to be used in and what the limitations are.

The below example is a horizontal application that could be utilized when design space is limited, such as footers, web banners and posters.

*

Horizontal Application:

Download Link:
.png
.jpg
.svg

Reversed (White):

Download Link:
.png
.jpg
.svg

*

Brand Guidelines

Once you have given your team access to the brand mark, it’s important to provide context on how that mark should be applied. Logo usage guidelines might include the minimum clear space necessary around a logo, guidelines for presenting the logo alongside corporate partners, as well as rules against skewing or rearranging the logo which can damage brand continuity. But really, there are a number of different guidelines a set of brand standards could display. It’s important to look at the nature of your NPO and brainstorm how your branding might live in the world.

Below is an example set of guidelines for No Hunger BC based on the needs of their organization.

*

*

Attributions:

This page contains material taken from:

Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151897

Belk, R. W., Bahn, K. D., & Mayer, R. N. (1982). Developmental recognition of consumption symbolism. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1086/208892 

Gendall, P., Hoek, J., Edwards, R., & McCool, J. (2012). A cross-sectional analysis of how young adults perceive tobacco brands: Implications for FCTC signatories. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 796. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-796

Nord, W. R., & Peter, J. P. (1980). A behavior modification perspective on marketing. Journal of Marketing, 44(2), 36–47. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/1249975

van Osselaer, S. M. J., & Janiszewski, C. (2001). Two ways of learning brand associations. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 202–223. https://doi.org/10.1086/322898

 

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Week 9 - Brand Identity: Mark/Logo Copyright © 2015 by Andrea Niosi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book