Chapter 2: Data for Equity?
Author Biographies
LLana James, PhD Candidate
Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, School of Computing, Queen’s University
LLana James develops and implements interventions to improve clinical outcomes, population health, and data management systems including the Research, Evaluation, Data, and Ethics Protocol for Black populations, Canadian Edition a.k.a REDE4BlackLives Protocol, with the tireless support of Dr. Ciann Wilson. She critically appraises current practices, and seeds new ethical futures; undoing the known, but often ignored issues and emergent harms of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications in medicine, healthcare, and public health that undermine human rights, and harm Black populations. LLana’s multi-pronged, transdisciplinary, collaborative research occurs at the intersections of AI, ML, data, law, and intervention science and grapples with the historical and ongoing effects of colonization on Black Indigenous life globally. As a Black woman of the diaspora born in Canada, of ancestry indigenous to Africa and the America’s, via the Caribbean, love and apocalyptic forces unleashed by transatlantic slavery. LLana is the Chair of the Ontario Black Bioethics Reference Group, leads the Personal Health Information, Justice and the Law Network, Chairs the Canadian Race Correction De-adoption Working Group, and is the Co-Chair of the Canada-US Coalition to End Race-correction in Healthcare. As a result of her ground-breaking work, LLana is the AI, Medicine and Data Justice Post-Doctoral Fellow at Queen’s University, her doctoral training, took place at the University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine.
Dr. Robyn K. Rowe, PhD
Health Data Research Network Canada and Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences
Dr. Robyn K. Rowe is a mother of four, a member of Matachewan First Nation, and a hereditary member of Teme Augama Anishnabai. She holds a PhD in rural and northern health from Laurentian University with her dissertation entitled The Fires we Keep: Honouring the land through Indigenous-led Resistance, Sovereignty, and Data. Robyn is an Executive Member of the Global Indigenous Data Alliance (http://www.gida-global.org) and was involved in the co-creation of the ‘CARE Principles of Indigenous Data Governance’ with Indigenous partners from around the world through the International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group as part of the Research Data Alliance (www.rd-alliance.org). Robyn is also the Indigenous Data Team Lead at Health Data Research Network Canada (www.HDRN.ca) and a Staff Scientist at ICES (www.ICES.on.ca). Robyn’s work intersects in the areas of Indigenous health and policy, Indigenous data governance and sovereignty, and social and environmental justice. Robyn’s continued research efforts focus on decolonizing health data environments through the assertion of inherent Indigenous rights and interests.
Dr. Robert W. Smith, DPhil
Division of Social and Behavioural Health Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
Dr. Robert W. Smith is a second-generation Canadian settler of English and Lithuanian ancestry grateful to live, work, and learn on the traditional territory of Lac Seul First Nation in what is now called Sioux Lookout, Ontario. He is an Assistant Professor (Status-Only) at Dalla Lana School of Public Health and public health practitioner working to collaboratively lead the creation of health systems with which everyone has an equitable opportunity for wellbeing. Rob is a social epidemiologist and applied health systems researcher by training, holding a Doctor of Philosophy in Population Health from the University of Oxford.
Chapter Overview
This chapter was written to serve as a critical and conventional overview of socio-legal, ethical, epidemiological, and policy dimensions of data in the health sector as it pertains to real-world contexts, versus the sanitized idealistic narratives bombarding us. This chapter encourages learners to evaluate their taken-for-granted assumptions about what data is, how it comes to be, and why it is being touted as a tool for equity. More importantly, this chapter seeks to engage learners as active participants.
To support active learning and thoughtfulness, each section header is stated as a question to help learners develop the critical thinking skills necessary for identifying and peeling back the layers of existing and emergent datascapes. This is an opportunity for learners to investigate the way language is seeded by powerful private and public actors and institutions to shape the narrative. For example, the uncertain practice of making forecasts has been renamed and repackaged as prediction and precision, a term that improperly implies certainty and infallibility. This chapter will facilitate learners in decoding and challenging the obscuration of the facts that undermine their ability to think and act ethically, accountably, and responsibly, regardless of what stage they are at in their education or career.
Learners will learn to understand data in context, located in the historical present, that is simultaneously unchanging, yet dynamic. This chapter offers an opportunity to engage and understand the deep historical relationships between contemporary data efforts, the proposed benefits, and test the claims that imply acquiring data leads to change in health systems and equity.
As opposed to a definitive guide on if or how data can or should be used to promote health equity and justice, this chapter puts learners in conversation with contemporary discourses. In order to do so, we will recap key historical facts and context (See Section 1: Data and Measuring Health Equity and Section 3: Indigenous Data Sovereignty).
Section 1: Data and Measuring Health Equity: Before describing the basics of how data is currently and commonly used to measure health inequities, we situate the topics of data, equity, and justice within the context of past and present systems of power responsible for racist violence, genocide, femicide, environmental injustice, and wealth accumulation in what is now called North America.
Section 2: Health Systems, Equity, and Population Health Management: We describe health policy movement towards “Population Health Management" as a strategy for building equity into health systems.
Section 3: Indigenous Data Sovereignty: We offer a pathway of the words, roles, and principles that are necessary to more meaningfully understand the significance of Indigenous Data Sovereignty and its activation within health systems.
Chapter Objectives
By the end of this chapter, you will have a more critical and robust understanding of the socio-legal, ethical, epidemiological, and policy dimensions of using data in the health sector. You will be able to:
- Identify what data is, and how (de)contextualizing data mediates its usage and limitations;
- Critically appraise for whom data is perceived as a (un)helpful tool for achieving equitable health services and systems for people and populations; and
- Understand Indigenous Data Sovereignty and its role in asserting First Nations, Inuit, and Métis rights to self-determination and autonomy.
The governance or stewardship of data itself, and the processes that are needed in order to implement Indigenous control over Indigenous data (Carrol, Rodriguez-Lonebear, & Martinez, 2019).
The interrelated conditions in which something exists or occurs (Merriam-Webster, 2022).
Achieving parity in policy, process, and outcomes for historically and/or currently underrepresented and/or marginalized people and groups while accounting for diversity (The University of British Columbia, n.d.).
Processes within health organizations that use data on the people they serve to:
1. Measure health status, unmet health and social needs, and health care experiences and outcomes;
2. Group patients or community members according to health and social and demographic characteristics, health care use, or likelihood of needing health care in the future;
3. Proactively design and advocate for services and policies that promote health, prevent disease, reduce inequities, and improve health care outcomes; and
4. Implement changes and evaluate whether they are leading to improved health or health care outcomes in a population (Primary Health Care Performance Initiative, 2018; Social Care Institute for Excellence, 2018; Waddell, Reid, et al., 2019).
The right of Indigenous Peoples to own, control, and use Indigenous data (Rainie et al., 2019).