2
Section One: The Fundamentals
A) History and Context
Exercise 1: Notebook Prompt
I learned several new things whilst listening to Episode 3: Card-Carrying Females on the Tested podcast. Many of the new things I learned actually surprised me because I had never heard of these practices before. The first thing I learned was that women with a difference in sex development (DSD) were often not allowed to participate in Olympic and competitive levels of sport. These women were denied the opportunity to compete if they did not take drugs to make a correction to their bodies natural testosterone levels. This really surprised me because I do not understand why women would be forced to lower naturally occurring levels of testosterone. These women were not adding to their natural levels; it was simply natural. This surprised me because It is not fair that women have to alter their natural bodies in order to compete in a sport they are good at. After hearing about Christine’s injury after taking medication to decrease their testosterone levels I became more upset and confused. It is hard to believe that people think naturally occurring testosterone in women is an unfair advantage. These women work equally as hard to become talented in their sports therefore they deserve equality.
Another thing that surprised me to learn was that gender verification tests were developed based on purely science. The Barr body test determined whether someone was a woman based on one small dark spot that showed up if someone was female. This is very interesting to me because how can one small dark spot on a test decide whether someone is female and can or cannot participate in competitive athletics? I also learned that sex is defined by chromosomes. If someone has XX chromosomes they are said to be female and if someone has XY chromosomes they are said to be a male. This really surprised me because I feel that this idea is too simple because these things don’t always define what someone’s gender may be. It is stated that science proved that these tests aren’t always accurate and someone can still be female if they don’t have a dark spot show up and they have XY chromosomes instead of XX. These tests are overly simple and don’t consider females who have differences in these tests which creates inequality. Learning that a hurdler named Maria lost everything due to these tests broke my heart. She lost her scholarship, her boyfriend and basically her life. She tried forever to fight this issue but did not want to interview for this podcast because she said she has said it all before and sadly nothing has changed. It is very surprising to see how many athletes have fought against these tests but nothing has permanently changed to create equality yet. Finally one very interesting thing that the title of this article alludes to, is the card that verified females were given after they had “passed” a gender verification test. This really surprised me because male athletes did not have to carry around a card explaining to the world that they are a “real” man. This shows outright discrimination for female athletes and shows the systemic discrimination that females have undergone in society for as long as many people can remember. Overall, this podcast really made me think about the issue of gender verification and made me realize that so many amazing athletes are being discriminated against and left out of competitions all because their bodies test outside of the preconceived norms society has put in place. I feel so confused about why this occurs because I think any and all females should be allowed to participate in female sporting events.
|
B) Timeline of History
Exercise 2: Notebook Prompt
What other significant case/milestone would you add to this timeline? Note it in your notebook along with a brief (one or two sentences) explanation of why you feel it is important.
One significant case I would add to this timeline is the beginning and end of nude parades. This is where Female athletes were required to undergo invasive physical examinations, including visual inspections, to confirm their sex. This needs its own spot on the timeline because it highlights the exploitation of bodies and underscores the horrible practices women were forced to participate in if they wanted to be a competitive athlete.
Another significant Case I would add to this timeline is the case of Polish Olympic sprinter Ewa Klobukowska in 1967. I learned about Ewa in a previous sociology course. Ewa was the first athlete to fail a chromosome test causing her to be banned from competition. This is important to add to the timeline because she was the first woman to be banned from competing. Her case is also important because it highlights that there were flaws in chromosome tests, meaning that many women could be potentially banned for no reason at all.
|
C) Gender coding in Sports
Exercise 3: Notebook Prompt
Has the gendering of sport ever been a constraint on your involvement? How?
Or, if not, why do you think this is?
The gendering of sports has definitely been a constraint on my involvement even if it is not always clear to see. It all started when I began playing basketball. I often felt the weight of societal expectations on my shoulders and I always felt the need to abide by norms and expectations set out for female athletes which impacted my experience playing sports. I feel that the sport of basketball is especially coded as a more masculine sport because it requires aggression and a unique athletic ability. I remember feeling a lot of pressure to balance being competitive and tough on the court and being feminine and proper off the court. There was always the hidden expectation that female basketball players should not be too aggressive or physical. I was constantly being told by my coaches to act ladylike after fouling someone, and this statement stuck with me for a long time. These ideas made me feel like less of a player because I am a girl and created a conflict between how I wanted to play and how I felt I was allowed to play in order to be accepted.
A more overt example of the way that the gendering of sport has constrained my involvement was when I started high-school. I always wanted to try playing football because it seemed like such a fun sport to play. But when I got to high school I quickly realized how gendered the sport of football was. I still had thoughts about joining the football team but my friends and teachers kept telling me that I wasn’t tough enough to play. There was however one female on our school’s football team but she was labelled and called several names which stopped me from trying the sport altogether. Since the sport of football is male coded I felt as though I wasn’t allowed to play even if I wanted to. Nobody around me understood that women could play this sport too which made me feel as if there was something wrong with me because I wanted to play. I was taught that women are the watchers of football and men are the players, therefore I fell into this stereotype and will forever regret not trying the sport.
All of my experiences playing different sports have shaped my identity and confidence as a female athlete. The gendering of sports has reinforced my ideas of what is acceptable female athlete behaviour and has constrained me by making me hold back skills such as toughness and aggression.
I want to note that it is very sad to see the difference in endorsements and prize money between Maria Sharapova and Serena Williams, even though Williams is clearly the better tennis player. This noticeable difference has to do with the fact that tennis is a female coded sport. Since Sharapova fit a more “ideal” feminine look she was used for advertisements and more which shows how flawed our systems are and how truly gender coded the sporting world is.
D) How is sport gendered in the popular imagination?
Exercise 4: Padlet/Notebook Prompt
While most sports are in fact unisex, gender coding remains pervasive, particularly at the professional level, although with a foundation established in youth competition. Participate in the poll below to share your views on how popular sports are gendered in the popular imagination. Also feel welcome to add or suggest sports that you feel strongly conform to the gender binary!
After you contribute to the padlet prompt, record your response in your notebook AND briefly discuss in two or three sentences how these responses and the polling figures in general confirm or contradict your assumptions about gender-coding and sports. Did anything surprise you?
Softball: Female, Gymnastics: Female, Hockey: Male, Volleyball: Neutral, Basketball: Male, Powerlifting: Male,Soccer: Neutral, Football: Male
These are my responses and they reflect my understanding of gender-coding in sports. Whilst I do understand that all sports have the potential to be unisex I find that they tend to be associated with either the male or female binary and my classmates responses solidify my understanding. Sports like hockey, basketball, powerlifting, and football have traditionally been seen as male-dominated. Historically, male professional teams in these sports existed long before female teams, and in some case like football a predominantly female league still doesn’t exist. From my own experience playing sports, I’ve observed how underrepresented women are in these male-coded sports. For example, during high school, there was only one girl on our football team. Even though many other women enjoyed the sport, they felt it was perceived as a male sport meaning they weren’t welcome to play. I view sports like volleyball and soccer as more gender-neutral. I believe this because I’ve seen both men and women actively participating in these sports. Growing up, I often played soccer against boys, which reinforced my perception of it as a neutral sport. Finally, I see both softball and gymnastics as female-coded sports. These sports are often advertised with only females and in places like high school and university there is often only females participating in these sports. For gymnastics especially females are often displayed to promote the sport and any males who participate are seen as more feminine. |
Section Two: Breaking it down
A) Title IX
Exercise 5: Notebook Prompt
In a longer version of the interview excerpted in the video above, Leah Thomas states “Trans women competing in women’s sports does not threaten women’s sports as a whole because trans women are a very small minority of all athletes and the NCAA rules around trans women competing in women’s sports have been around for 10+ years and we haven’t seen any massive wave of trans women dominating”?
Do you agree with this statement? See also the image above suggesting that the issue may be overblown by politicians and influencers who don’t actually care that much about women’s sports.
Please share any thoughts you have in your Notebook by clicking on the audio button above or writing a few sentences.
I think that Lia Thomas’s statement addresses a crucial point relating to the debate about transgender athletes’ participation in women’s sports. It is true that trans women are a very small minority and according to the videos above it seems like they have very little advantage if any over biological females. I agree that there is a severe lack of evidence proving that transgender women have an advantage over biological women, therefore I feel that Lia Thomas’s statement does have some truth to it.
I also feel that this issue is often overblown by politicians and influencers like most issues in society. Politicians and influencers are often seeking to please the greatest number of people, and in this circumstance the majority of people believe that transgender women competing in women’s sports is wrong. Politicians and influencers have the ability to hold power over the majority of people therefore they create strong opinions that are often controversial. In the case of this issue I do feel like people of power have gone over the top to create a problem out of a small issue. In all I do feel that Lia Thomas has a solid point in what she says here, but I feel that it is very important to gather more evidence to ensure that policies in sports are based on fairness and inclusivity.
|
B) Unfair Advantage?
Exercise 6: Notebook Prompt
What does the host and writer, Rose Eveleth, have to say on the issue of unfair advantage?
Can you think of other examples of unique biological or circumstantial advantages from which athletes have benefitted enormously that have nothing to do with gender?
Rose Eveleth has a lot to say about the issue of unfair advantage but it is very clear that this topic is very complex. First off, she explains that there are at least 20 different genetic factors that contribute to athletic performance and states that many athletes naturally possess some of these genetic mutations that help them perform in their particular sports. For instance she mentions Olympic athlete Micheal Phelps who has unique physicalities like his ability to process lactic acid differently and a wide wingspan which provide him with a natural advantage. Eveleth explains that despite these advantages Micheal Phelps was never seen as having an unfair advantage which highlights how unequally this issue is looked at. Eveleth also explains that sports are divided by sex therefore, athletes with difference in sex development (DSD) often face discrimination and are accused of having unfair advantage because their characteristics may differ slightly from a male/female norm. These facts raise important questions about what is truly unfair advantage in the sporting world. Eveleth then goes on to explain that there is flawed data in proving what is truly unfair advantage which explains that this topic is even more complicated than it seems. Overall, Rose Eveleth’s conversation on this topic underscores how truly complex the issue of unfair advantage is and explains how it requires a lot more research and understanding.
A few other unique biological or circumstantial advantages I can think of that have nothing to do with gender are flexibility/hyper-mobility and perfect vision. Simone Biles a world renowned gymnast has hyper-mobility and she used this to her greatest advantage. I think that in the sport of gymnastics incredible flexibility and hyper-mobility would give an athlete a significant advantage because they would be able to bend and do tricks that other athletes with not as much mobility couldn’t do. I also think that perfect vision could be a significant advantage for athletes like baseball players. If athletes have the ability to see the ball better than other players on the field then they have a significantly better chance at both hitting and catching the ball. Both of these are naturally occurring advantages which I believe are acceptable. There is no reason why things such as testosterone levels should be seen as unfair or unacceptable when things such as hyper-mobility are acceptable.
|
Again, let’s turn to Katie Barnes who points out that we tend to forget amidst all the debate that “sports, by design, are not fair” (235), that “the reality of sports is that we accept unfairness all the time” (235).
Do you agree? Why? In your experience, how fair are sports? Feel welcome to add a video response in the padlet and provide an example if you’re willing. Make sure you include a screenshot of your response in your notebook.
In Favor:
I for sure agree with what Katie Barnes has stated here, in fact I have been thinking this throughout the entirety of this module. Sports are not fair. In all sports, especially elite sports, natural talent and skill, access to resources, and systemic inequalities will often always create disparities that are way beyond the control of an individual athlete. Fairness in sports is very similar to fairness in life. There is always going to be someone who is wealthier than others, there is always going to be someone with better health, and there is always going to be someone who is just naturally more skilled. Fairness is simply just not a reality in life or in sports. For example there is always going to be an athlete who can afford expensive training facilities and personal trainers. This athlete may not be more skilled than someone who can’t afford these things but they will be able to increase their potential because they have access to these resources. In my own experience playing high school basketball, I’ve seen teammates succeed over others with the same skill level because they had access to resources such as private coaching and rep teams outside of school. Even though these teammates had very similar talent they did not have similar opportunities. I feel that this is unfair but it is never questioned. In high level sports there are a lot of hidden inequalities that create unfair circumstances as well. For example, in the NHL some referees are better than others and some ice rinks are in better shape than others. This gives certain teams unfair advantages. This example shows how unnoticed unfairness is and shows how we accept it without even knowing it. Sports are always going to have an aspect of unfairness. A team is always going to have some kind of advantage over another and an individual is always going to be better at a sport than another individual. I feel that unfairness in sport is inevitable.
|
B) The Paris Olympics
Optional Response:
What does Robins mean when she argues that:
“The aims of transvestigating an Olympic athlete are not, in any meaningful sense, anything to do with sports, or fairness, or even with women (cis women, at least) as a social category. Rather, they have everything to do with transness, and the public expression of transfemininity.
For my money this has never been about sport.
What it has always been is an excuse to publicly relitigate the existence of trans women.”
Make a note in your Notebook.
|
Here is my padlet post for what I learned.
- The first thing I learned was that women needed to have a gender verification card proving that they were female in order to compete in competitive athletics. This concept is crazy and immoral to me because nobody should have to prove who they are to be who they are!
- The second thing I learned is that testosterone levels do not determine who is male or female. I learned that this is in fact extremely complex and many females can actually have high testosterone levels.
- The third thing I learned was that many athletes have unique advantages such as Micheal Phelps’ incredible wingspan and ability to process lactic acid differently. I learned that these advantages are not seen as unfair and are often celebrated but when women have a possible small advantage like higher testosterone levels they are told they have an unfair advantage.
I would like to explore how transgender athletes are handled in youth sports? Are they allowed to participate at competitive levels with the gender they associate with or do they have to compete on a team with their biological gender?
I would also like to learn more about current sex testing and if there is current scientific research being done to prove that sex testing initiatives are either correct or flawed.
One question I still have is will there ever be the possibility of completely taking gender out of sports? If so, what will sports begin to look like?
Feedback/Errata