"

2

Section One: The Fundamentals 

A) History and Context

Exercise 1: Notebook Prompt

The issue of gender inclusivity in sports, particularly concerning transgender athletes, has indeed become a significant topic of debate in contemporary society. Katie Barnes highlights this in “Fair Play,” suggesting that sports have become a proxy battleground for broader societal issues regarding transgender visibility and rights. This context reflects the historical struggles for inclusion that various groups, including women and now transgender and intersex athletes, have faced within the sports domain.

The historical context provided from the limited participation of women in the earliest modern Olympics to the eventual establishment of gender verification practices—underscores a long-standing pattern of scrutiny and exclusion in sports based on gender. This scrutiny was historically justified by perceived physical inferiorities or the potential for unfair advantages, leading to invasive practices like “nude parades” and chromosome testing to verify gender, practices which did not apply to male athletes.

These practices have evolved but continue in different forms today, particularly affecting transgender and intersex athletes. The current debates often focus on whether to allow transgender women to compete in women’s categories, driven by concerns over fairness and physical advantages. However, as noted, the outright dominance by transgender athletes in women’s sports has not materialized to the extent some critics feared, suggesting that the issues are more complex and nuanced than some arguments suggest.

The discussions around these topics serve as a reminder of the ongoing challenges sports organizations face in balancing fairness, inclusivity, and the right to compete. As society’s understanding of gender continues to evolve, so too does the landscape of sports competition. The notion of what could have been if sports had prioritized integration over separation invites us to reconsider current policies and their implications for all athletes.

Exploring these issues through the lens of historical and current practices offers valuable insights into how sports might continue to evolve in fostering inclusivity while maintaining fairness. This ongoing dialogue is crucial for ensuring that sports remain a source of empowerment and inclusion for everyone, regardless of gender identity.

 

 

B) Timeline of History

Exercise 2: Notebook Prompt

What other significant case/milestone would you add to this timeline? Note it in your notebook along with a brief (one or two sentences) explanation of why you feel it is important.

2003 IOC Transgender Guidelines: The IOC allowed transgender athletes to participate in the Olympics under certain conditions. This was a pivotal moment because it recognized the need for inclusivity while attempting to maintain fairness in competition. This policy update reflected a growing acknowledgment of gender diversity in sports and set a precedent for other international sporting organizations.

 

 

C) Gender coding in Sports 

Exercise 3: Notebook Prompt

Has the gendering of sport ever been a constraint on your involvement? How?

Or, if not, why do you think this is?

Gendering in sports hasn’t really been a constraint for me, probably because,

  1. Personal Alignment with Gender Norms: My interests in sports seem to align well with activities that are traditionally associated with my gender. This has meant I haven’t really felt any barriers or restrictions when it comes to participating in these sports, making the experience straightforward and enjoyable.

  2. Inclusive Environment: The sports communities and programs I’ve been part of have really emphasized inclusivity, no matter one’s gender. It’s made a huge difference because it’s all about how you play and not who you are, which has definitely made me feel more welcome and less constrained by traditional gender roles.

 

 

 

 

D) How is sport gendered in the popular imagination?

Exercise 4: Padlet/Notebook Prompt 

While most sports are in fact unisex, gender coding remains pervasive, particularly at the professional level, although with a foundation established in youth competition. Participate in the poll below to share your views on how popular sports are gendered in the popular imagination. Also feel welcome to add or suggest sports that you feel strongly conform to the gender binary!

After you contribute to the padlet prompt, record your response in your notebook AND briefly discuss in two or three sentences how these responses and the polling figures in general confirm or contradict your assumptions about gender-coding and sports. Did anything surprise you?

In sports, gender coding is particularly pronounced at the professional level, reflecting deep-rooted cultural perceptions that are often established during youth competitions. Sports like American football and soccer are typically seen as masculine due to their emphasis on physicality and a long history of male-exclusive professional leagues. Conversely, sports such as gymnastics and figure skating are popularly imagined as feminine, attributed to their artistic components and societal norms that associate grace and elegance with femininity.

Despite these stereotypes, some sports are challenging these perceptions. Tennis, for instance, has made significant strides toward gender neutrality, notably at the Grand Slam level, where men and women compete for equal prize money. Similarly, athletics (track and field) offers a broad spectrum of events that provide nearly equal visibility and opportunities to both genders, helping to balance gender perceptions in the sport.

 

 

 

Section Two: Breaking it down

A) Title IX

Exercise 5: Notebook Prompt 

In a longer version of the interview excerpted in the video above, Leah Thomas states “Trans women competing in women’s sports does not threaten women’s sports as a whole because trans women are a very small minority of all athletes and the NCAA rules around trans women competing in women’s sports have been around for 10+ years and we haven’t seen any massive wave of trans women dominating”?

Do you agree with this statement? See also the image above suggesting that the issue may be overblown by politicians and influencers who don’t actually care that much about women’s sports.

Please share any thoughts you have in your Notebook by clicking on the audio button above or writing a few sentences.

Leah Thomas’s assertion highlights an important perspective on the inclusion of transgender women in women’s sports, suggesting that their participation does not pose a threat to the integrity of women’s sports. Thomas points out that transgender women are a small minority among athletes, and existing NCAA regulations have allowed their participation for over a decade without leading to dominance in sports competitions. This indicates that the actual impact of transgender athletes in women’s sports might be less significant than some public discussions suggest.

Her statement aligns with research indicating that while transgender athletes have been allowed to compete, there has not been a widespread or unfair advantage gained that could threaten the competitive balance within women’s sports. Furthermore, the attention given to this issue by politicians and media may indeed be disproportionate, focusing more on ideological or political agendas rather than a factual assessment of the impact on sports.

This perspective invites a broader discussion on fairness and equality in sports, emphasizing the need for policies that support inclusivity while ensuring competitive equity. It challenges the narrative that often surrounds transgender athletes’ participation in sports, suggesting a need for a balanced and evidence-based approach to policy-making in sports organizations.

 

 

B) Unfair Advantage?

Exercise 6: Notebook Prompt

What does the host and writer, Rose Eveleth, have to say on the issue of unfair advantage?

Can you think of other examples of unique biological or circumstantial advantages from which athletes have benefitted enormously that have nothing to do with gender?

Eveleth highlights how elite athletes often possess unique physical traits or abilities that may provide them with significant advantages in their sports. She questions the fairness of penalizing athletes for their natural physiological makeup, especially when these traits are not the result of performance-enhancing drugs or other artificial enhancements.

Eveleth’s analysis touches upon the ethical and scientific challenges in defining fairness in sports. She examines how sports authorities have historically managed these differences, especially concerning gender. For instance, women who naturally exhibit characteristics that are typically considered masculine might face scrutiny or even disqualification from competition, reflecting an ongoing debate about gender and biological advantages in sports.

The podcast encourages listeners to consider other examples where athletes might benefit from unique biological or circumstantial advantages unrelated to gender:

  1. High Altitude Adaptation: Athletes from high-altitude areas, like many East African runners, often perform exceptionally well in endurance sports due to their adaptation to low oxygen environments, which enhances their stamina and respiratory efficiency.

  2. Hypermobile Joints: Athletes with hypermobility enjoy a wider range of motion, which can be advantageous in sports like gymnastics, swimming, or martial arts, where flexibility is crucial.

  3. Visual Acuity: Sharp eyesight can provide distinct advantages in sports requiring precision and accuracy, such as archery, shooting, or cricket.

 

 

 

Exercise 7: Padlet/Notebook Prompt

Again, let’s turn to Katie Barnes who points out that we tend to forget amidst all the debate that “sports, by design, are not fair” (235), that “the reality of sports is that we accept unfairness all the time” (235).

Do you agree? Why? In your experience, how fair are sports? Feel welcome to add a video response in the padlet and provide an example if you’re willing. Make sure you include a screenshot of your response in your notebook.

Katie Barnes says that sports are not always fair, which means some people might have more advantages than others. This is because some athletes come from places where they can get better training or equipment, and some might have natural abilities that help them excel in sports.

I agree with this because fairness in sports isn’t just about following the rules during the game. It also has a lot to do with what kind of support and resources athletes have access to before they even play. For example, athletes from richer countries or communities often have better sports facilities, coaches, and medical care, which helps them perform better.

Also, some athletes are born with physical traits that make them better at certain sports, like having longer arms for swimming. While rules try to keep things fair, these natural differences and unequal access to resources can make sports seem not entirely fair.

Overall, while sports teach good values like teamwork and discipline, they also show us how bigger social and economic issues can influence who gets to participate and who succeeds.

 

 

B) The Paris Olympics 

Optional Response:

What does Robins mean when she argues that:

“The aims of transvestigating an Olympic athlete are not, in any meaningful sense, anything to do with sports, or fairness, or even with women (cis women, at least) as a social category. Rather, they have everything to do with transness, and the public expression of transfemininity.

For my money this has never been about sport.

What it has always been is an excuse to publicly relitigate the existence of trans women.”

Make a note in your Notebook.

 

 

 

 

 

 

License

Icon for the Public Domain license

This work (Gender, Sport, and Social Justice by Kelly McGuire) is free of known copyright restrictions.