References
NOTE: All images used in the cover page and throughout the handbook and toolkit were created using a Canva.com subscription, unless otherwise indicated.
Allan, B., Perreault, A., Chenoweth, J., Biin, D., Hobenshield, S., Ormiston, T., Hardman, S. A., Lacerte, L., Wright, L., & Wilson, J. (2018). Pulling together: A guide for teachers and instructors. BCcampus. Retrieved March 7, 2024, from https://opentextbc.ca/indigenizationinstructors
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
Bens, S. L. (2022). Helping students resolve the ambiguous expectations of academic integrity. In S. E. Eaton (Ed.), Ethics and integrity in educational contexts: Vol. 1. Academic integrity in Canada (p. 377-390). Springer. https://doi-org.library.sheridanc.on.ca/10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_19
Birks, D., & Clare, J. (2023). Linking artificial intelligence facilitated academic misconduct to existing prevention frameworks. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(20). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00142-3
Burns, A., Lobry de Bruyn, L., & Wilson, S. C. (2023). A rubric approach to assessing information literacy competency in tertiary curricula. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.01.10
CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org
Chisholm, A., & Spencer, B. (2019). Through the looking glass: Viewing first-year composition through the lens of information literacy. Communications in Information Literacy, 13(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2019.13.1.4
Compton, M. (n.d.). AI = assessment innovation. Teachers Going Gradeless. https://growbeyondgrades.org/blog/ai-assessment-innovation
Conerton, K., David, M., & Jones, K. What do students think and feel about research? University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/253916
Eva, N. & MacKay, B. (2019). Information literacy and liberal education: From Google to scholarly sources. In R. Land & J. Timmermans (Eds.), Educational futures: Vol. 73. Threshold concepts on the edge (pp. 229–237). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/978004419971_016
Folk, A. L. (2021). Exploring the development of undergraduate students’ information literacy through their experiences with research assignments. College & Research Libraries, 82(7), 1035-1055. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.82.7.1035
Goodman, X., Watts, J., Arenas, R., Weigel, R., & Terrell, T. (2018). Applying an information literacy rubric to first-year health sciences student research posters. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(1), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.400
Lipnevich, A. A., McCallen, L. N., Miles, K. P., & Smith, J. K. (2014). Mind the gap! Students’ use of exemplars and detailed rubrics as formative assessment. Instructional Science, 42, 539-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9299-9
Hardy, S. M., Kordonowy, G., & Liss, K. (2022). How do assignments dispose students toward research? Answer-getting and problem-exploring in first-year writing. Composition Forum, 48. https://hdl.handle.net/2144/46091
Hicks, A., & Lloyd, A. (2023). Reaching into the basket of doom: Learning outcomes, discourse and information literacy. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(2), 282-298. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211067216
Kirker, M. J., & Stonebraker, I. (2019). Architects, renovators, builders, and fragmenters: A model for first year students’ self-perceptions and perceptions of information literacy. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.10.009
Lang, J. M. (2013). Cheating lessons: Learning from academic dishonesty. Harvard University Press.
Mabee, S. H., & Fancher, S. E. (2020). Curiosity is a luxury of the financially secure: The affective thresholds of information literacy. Library Trends, 68(3), 482-505. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2020.0002
Middendorf, J., & Baer A. (2019). Bottlenecks of information literacy. In C. Gibson & S. Mader (Eds.), Building teaching and learning communities: Creating shared meaning and purpose (pp. 51-68). ACRL Publications. https://rdw.rowan.edu/lib_scholarship/15/
Penaluna, L-A., & Ross, R. (2022). How to talk about academic integrity so students will listen: Addressing ethical decision-making using scenarios. In S. E. Eaton (Ed.), Ethics and integrity in educational contexts: Vol. 1. Academic integrity in Canada (p. 393-409). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_20
Poitras Pratt, Y., & Gladue, K. (2022). Re-defining academic integrity: Embracing Indigenous truths. In S. E. Eaton (Ed.), Ethics and integrity in educational contexts: Vol. 1. Academic integrity in Canada (p. 103-123). Springer. https://doi-org.library.sheridanc.on.ca/10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_5
Purdy, J. P., & Walker, J. R. (2013). Liminal spaces and research identity: The construction of introductory composition students as researchers. Pedagogy, 13(1), 9-41. https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1814260
Rutgers School of Communication and Information. (n.d.). Information search process. Retrieved March 7, 2024, from http://wp.comminfo.rutgers.edu/ckuhlthau/information-search-process
Seigsmund, A. (2017). Using self-assessment to develop metacognition and self-regulated learners. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 364(11), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx096
Svinicki, M.D. (2004). Learning and motivation in the postsecondary classroom. Jossey Bass.
Vaccino-Salvadore, S., & Buck, R. H. (2021). Moving from plagiarism police to integrity coaches: Assisting novice students in understanding the relationship between research and ownership. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(20). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00085-7
Verwoord, R., Mitchell, A., & Machado, J. (2011). Supporting Indigenous students through a culturally relevant assessment model based on the medicine wheel. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 34(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.14288/cjne.v34i1.196529
William, S., & Perrone, F. (2018). Linking assessment practices to Indigenous ways of knowing. National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment. https://www.learningoutcomesassessment.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/EquityResponse-WilliamsPerrone.pdf
Wilson, G., & Angell, K. (2017). Mapping the Association of College and Research Libraries information literacy framework and nursing professional standards onto an assessment rubric. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 150-154. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.39
