2
Section One: The Fundamentals
A) History and Context
Exercise 1: Notebook Prompt
Make a note of anything that surprised you in this episode or something new that you learned.
One thing that surprised me in Episode Three of Tested was that women weren’t allowed to compete in the first modern Olympics. Even later, they could only join a few events. I also learned that many women had to go through unfair and embarrassing sex tests just to prove they were female. It showed how unfairly women were treated in sports.
|
B) Timeline of History
Exercise 2: Notebook Prompt
What other significant case/milestone would you add to this timeline? Note it in your notebook along with a brief (one or two sentences) explanation of why you feel it is important.
As stated in the module..
Milestone: In 2012, for the first time in Olympic history, every participating country included female athletes on their teams. Why it’s important: This marked a significant step toward gender equality in sports, showing that women finally had the opportunity to represent their countries. |
C) Gender coding in Sports
Exercise 3: Notebook Prompt
Has the gendering of sport ever been a constraint on your involvement? How?
Or, if not, why do you think this is?
Although it hasn’t directly limited my involvement, I can understand how it impacts others. I believe that being raised in a women empowerment environment is the outcome of my exposure to nurturing settings that promoted equal play for boys and girls. Some sports, meanwhile, are still perceived as “for boys” or “for girls,” which can make people feel as if they don’t belong or aren’t taken seriously if they participate in something that varies from those stereotypes.
|
D) How is sport gendered in the popular imagination?
Exercise 4: Padlet/Notebook Prompt
While most sports are in fact unisex, gender coding remains pervasive, particularly at the professional level, although with a foundation established in youth competition. Participate in the poll below to share your views on how popular sports are gendered in the popular imagination. Also feel welcome to add or suggest sports that you feel strongly conform to the gender binary!
After you contribute to the padlet prompt, record your response in your notebook AND briefly discuss in two or three sentences how these responses and the polling figures in general confirm or contradict your assumptions about gender-coding and sports. Did anything surprise you?
I contributed cricket to the poll The polling data could help me see if people’s views reflect these gender norm assumptions or challenge them. After completing the poll, I would learn that, despite its connection with masculinity, horseback riding is frequently perceived as a feminine sport. The vote recognizing it as “female” may be a reflection of perceptions that associate femininity with beauty and tradition. Examining the findings, I’d be shocked to see how this perspective differs from horseback riding’s past associations with soldiers and royalty, demonstrating how media and culture currently define its gendered image.
|
Section Two: Breaking it down
A) Title IX
Exercise 5: Notebook Prompt
In a longer version of the interview excerpted in the video above, Leah Thomas states “Trans women competing in women’s sports does not threaten women’s sports as a whole because trans women are a very small minority of all athletes and the NCAA rules around trans women competing in women’s sports have been around for 10+ years and we haven’t seen any massive wave of trans women dominating”?
Do you agree with this statement? See also the image above suggesting that the issue may be overblown by politicians and influencers who don’t actually care that much about women’s sports.
Please share any thoughts you have in your Notebook by clicking on the audio button above or writing a few sentences.
I agree with what Leah Thomas said. Given that trans women are a small minority in athletics, the idea that they would “threaten” women’s sports in some way seems excessive. The majority of transgender female athletes encounter numerous obstacles, such as the need for hormone medication, which restricts any possible physical benefits. According to the image, politicians and other leaders frequently exaggerate the problem since they may not actually care about women’s sports but rather use them to further their own political or social objectives. This may draw attention away from more pressing problems in women’s sports, such as unequal pay and a lack of support for female athletes. Regardless of gender identity, the emphasis should be on establishing fair and accepting settings for all athletes regardless of gender, sex, identity, etc. |
B) Unfair Advantage?
Exercise 6: Notebook Prompt
What does the host and writer, Rose Eveleth, have to say on the issue of unfair advantage?
Can you think of other examples of unique biological or circumstantial advantages from which athletes have benefitted enormously that have nothing to do with gender?
Example of unique biological or circumstantial advantages in sports: Height in Basketball or Volleyball: Athletes who are tall often have a natural advantage in sports like basketball or volleyball, as height can make a big difference in reaching the net or basket. In her discussion of “unfair advantage” in relation to trans women in sports, author Rose Evereth highlights how exaggerated the belief is that trans women have a substantial advantage over cisgender women. She clears up the myth that trans women athletes dominate women’s sports by pointing out that they frequently encounter a number of obstacles, such as the need for hormone therapy, which lessens any possible physical advantages they could have. Fairness and making sure that all athletes, regardless of gender identity, have equal opportunity and are not subjected to discrimination should be valid concerns, according to Rose Evereth. |
Again, let’s turn to Katie Barnes who points out that we tend to forget amidst all the debate that “sports, by design, are not fair” (235), that “the reality of sports is that we accept unfairness all the time” (235).
Do you agree? Why? In your experience, how fair are sports? Feel welcome to add a video response in the padlet and provide an example if you’re willing. Make sure you include a screenshot of your response in your notebook.
Katie Barnes makes a valid point when she says that “sports, by design, are not fair.” Sports are unfair in a lot of ways due to things like rules, physical differences, and access to resources. For instance, not all athletes have equal access to professional coaching or training, and some athletes have advantages like height or strength. I’ve found that being absolutely fair isn’t necessarily the goal of sports. In team sports, collaboration can sometimes overcome individual ability disadvantages. Athletes from wealthy countries may have an advantage over those from less wealthy countries at the professional level because they frequently have greater resources, such as better training, gear, and support. Sports are about overcoming these imbalances, and success often depends on how athletes deal with these challenges. Even if the playing field isn’t always even, it’s part of what makes sports interesting.
|
B) The Paris Olympics
Optional Response:
What does Robins mean when she argues that:
“The aims of transvestigating an Olympic athlete are not, in any meaningful sense, anything to do with sports, or fairness, or even with women (cis women, at least) as a social category. Rather, they have everything to do with transness, and the public expression of transfemininity.
For my money this has never been about sport.
What it has always been is an excuse to publicly relitigate the existence of trans women.”
Make a note in your Notebook.
Robins argues that attacks on trans women athletes, like Imane Khelif, aren’t really about fairness in sports or protecting cis women. Instead, they’re about challenging the existence of trans women and transfemininity. Robins believes these attacks use sports as an excuse to publicly question and reject the presence of trans women in society, rather than focusing on the actual competition or fairness. |