References
Adair, D. (2017). Developing an international pool of quality reviewers. The American Journal of Distance Education, 31(3), 154-159.
Adair, D., & Shattuck, K. (2015). Quality Matters: An educational input in an output design-based research project. The American Journal of Distance Education, 29(3), 159-165.
Ali, R., & Wright, J. (2017). Examination of the QM process: Making a case for transformative professional development model. International Journal of eLearning, 16(4), 329-347.
Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium, 1–4. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
Appana, S. (2008). A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Journal of E-Learning, 7(1), 5–22.
Budden, C., & Budden, M. (2013). A look at an implementation of the Quality Matters program in a collegiate environment: Benefits and Challenges. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 6(4), 381-384.
Cowan, J., Richter, S., Miller, T., Rhode, J., Click, A., & Underwood, J. (2017). Building a sustainable Quality Matters community of practice through social network analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 31(3), 160-172.
Crews, T., Bordonada, T., & Wilkinson, K. (2017). Student feedback on Quality Matters standards for online course design. Educause. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2017/6/student-feedback-on-quality-matters-standards-for-online-course-design
Dietz-Uhler, B., Fisher, A., & Han, A. (2007). Designing online courses to promote student retention. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 36(1), 105-112.
Gibson, P., & Dunning, P. (2012). Creating quality online course design through a peer-reviewed assessment. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18(1), 209-228.
Hill, P. (2012). Online Educational Delivery Models: A Descriptive View. EDUCAUSE Review, 47, 84–86,. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.lib.utexas.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ996668&site=ehost-live%255Cnhttps://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM1263.pdf
Hoffman, G. (2012). Using the Quality Matters rubric to improve online cataloguing courses. Cataloguing and Classification Quarterly, 50, 158-171.
Hollowell, G., Brooks, R., & Anderson, Y. (2017). Course design, Quality Matters training, and student outcomes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 31(3), 207-216.
Legon, R. (2006). Comparison of the Quality Matters rubric to accreditation standards for distance learning.
Legon, R. (2015). Measuring the impact of the Quality Matters rubric: A discussion of possibilities. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(3), 166-173.
Legon, R., & Runyon, J. (2007). Research on the impact of the Quality Matters course review process. 23rd Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference
Lowenthal, P., & Hodges, B. (2015). In search of quality: Using Quality Matters to analyze the quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 83-101.
Marlos Varonis, E. (2014). Most courses are not born digital: An overview of the QM peer review design process for online course design. Campus Wide Information Systems, 31(4), 217-229.
Martin, F., Ndoye, A., & Wilkins, P. (2016). Using learning analytics to enhance student learning in online courses based on Quality Matters standards. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(2), 165-187.
Newby, J., Eagleson, L., & Pfander, J. (2014). Quality Matters: New roles for librarians using standards for online course design. Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning, 8, 32-44.
Ralston-Berg, P., & Nath, L. (2008). What makes a quality online course? The student perspective. 24th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference
Roehrs, C., Wang, L., & Kendrick, D. (2013). Preparing faculty to use the Quality Matters model for course improvement. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 52-67.
Schwegler, A., & Altman, B. (2015). Analysis of peer review comments: QM recommendations and feedback intervention theory. The American Journal of Distance Education, 29, 186-187.
Sener, J. (n.d.). Quality Matters: Inter-institutional quality improvement for online courses.
Shattuck, K. (2010). Quality Matters: A faculty-centred program to assure quality in online course design
Shattuck, K. (n.d.). What we’re learning from Quality Matters-focused research: Research, practice, continuous improvement.
Swan, K., Matthews, D., Bogle, L., Boles, E., & Day, S. (2012). Linking online course design and implementation to learning outcomes: A design experiment. Internet and Higher Education, 15, 81-88.
TeachOnline.ca (2017). OntarioLearn: 24 public colleges in Ontario collaborate to increase student access and choice of quality programs and courses
University of Guelph Ontario Agricultural College. (2016). OAC course earns Canada-first certification
Young, M. (2014). Integrating Quality Matters into hybrid course design: A principles of marketing case study. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(3), 233-243
