Assessment Types at Niagara College

The collective agreement (effective to September, 2021) identifies three types of evaluation factors; EP Essay/Project (0.030), RT Routine or Assisted (0.015), and IP In-Process (0.0092). Each course can be made up of assessments that fall in to one or a number of these types. Before the method(s) of evaluation and feedback are established for a course, the supervisor will consult with the affected teachers as a group. Normally, the group will consist of the teachers working within the affected program. The group may consist of teachers teaching a course that is being taught across programs. If only one teacher is assigned to a program, that teacher shall be deemed to be “the group” for the purposes of this article (in the Collective Agreement).

  1. “Essay or project evaluation and feedback” is grading:
    1. essays
    2. essay type assignments or tests
    3. projects; or
    4. student performance based on behavioral assessments compiled by the teacher outside teaching contact hours.
  2. “Routine or assisted evaluation and feedback” is grading by the teacher outside teaching contact hours of short answer tests or other evaluative tools where mechanical marking assistance or marking assistants are provided.
  3. “In-process evaluation and feedback” is evaluation performed within the teaching contact hour.

Assessment Options and Opportunities

Within these three categories, faculty have many options for assessing their students. As you decide on assessments for your course, give some thought to the many options that are available to you and which options would support authentic assessment that will demonstrate student learning.

As you plan your assessments, you may want to offer students a choice in how they show what they have learned. For instance, a student research project might be submitted as a report, presentation, video, or infographic. This approach can help students be more invested in their work and is an excellent way to engage Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles through multiple means of action and expression and multiple means of engagement.

Essay or Project Evaluation

Essay Research paper or report Poster Business or financial plan
Case study or scenario Infographic Video Discussion board
Presentation Interview or mock interview Portfolio Advertisement
Reflection Data analysis Self-assessment Blog
Budget Journal Decision analysis Checklist
Essay test or exam Model Plan or schematic Design
Lab report

Routine or Assisted Evaluation

Multiple choice test or exam Short answer test or exam Oral test or exam Group test or two-stage test or exam

In-Process Evaluation

Clinical experience Work experience Interview or mock interview Lab
Role play Debate Presentation Practicum
Simulation Pitch Case study Oral test or exam
Scenario

In the next section, we’ll explore authentic assessments and their value in the teaching and learning process. We’ll also discuss ways to create authentic assessments in your course.

definition

License

NC Course Re-Design, Renewal, and Development Guide_Alpha Copyright © by lynnokeeffe. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book