"

5 Chapter Five: Accessing Sport

Section one: The fundamentals 

A)

Exercise 1: Notebook Prompt 

Many of you are likely familiar with the concept of “ability inequity,” which the authors of this article define as “an unjust or unfair  (a) ‘distribution of access to and protection from abilities generated through human interventions’ or (b) ‘judgment of abilities intrinsic to biological structures such as the human body’.”

However, they go on to identify the following “ability concepts” that are less familiar:

1) ability security (one is able to live a decent life with whatever set of abilities one has)

2) ability identity security (to be able to be at ease with ones abilities)

How prevalent are these forms of security among disabled people you know? Or, if you identify as a disabled person, would you say your social surroundings and community foster and support these kinds of security? Furthermore, while the focus of the article is on Kinesiology programs, it is also important to reflect on how academia in general accommodates for disability. If you feel comfortable answering this question, what has been your experience of postsecondary education to date?

-OR-

The authors also observe that “Ableism not only intersects with other forms of oppression, such as racism, sexism, ageism, and classism, but abilities are often used to justify such negative ‘isms’.”

What do you think this means? Provide an example.

What do you think this means? Provide an example.

Number 1: Ableism and Oppression

  • Ableism could also be another form of oppression due to the values of people based on productivity.  For example, it is rare to see a person with disabilities working in retail jobs and fast food restaurants due to fast productivity.

Implicit bias Test

  • The implicit bias test can be tested in revealing subconscious biases, but contains limitations. It does not fully reflect explicit discrimination. However, it does highlight the need for continued self reflection and awareness.

 

 

Exercise 2: Implicit Bias Test 

Did anything surprise you about the results of the test? Please share if you’re comfortable OR comment on the usefulness of these kinds of tests more generally.

I am not surprise about the result of the the test. Instead the result further analyzed the deeper meaning of the term ableism and implicit bias test.

 

B) Keywords

Exercise 3:

Add the keyword you contributed to padlet and briefly (50 words max) explain its importance to you.

Keyword of choice: Accessibility

  • The term accessibility refers to the degrees in which areas, service, goods and opportunities were available to people with disabilities.
  • Accessibility is also important due to whether disabled individuals could fully engage in society.

 

B) On Disability

Exercise 4:  Complete the Activities

Exercise 5: Notebook Prompt 

What do Fitzgerald and Long identify as barriers to inclusion and how might these apply to sport in particular?

  • Fitzgerald and Long identify barriers such as lack of social stigma, funding, and unreachable space in sport. In other words, fewer opportunities for disabled athletes to train, compete and be recognized at the same level as the non-disabled athletes.

C) Inclusion, Integration, Separation

Exercise 6: Complete the Activities 

Exercise 7: Notebook Prompt

Choose ONE of the three questions Fitzgerald and Long argue disability sport needs to address and record your thoughts in your Notebook. 

  1. Should sport be grouped by ability or disability?
  2. Is sport for participation or competition?
  3. Should sport competitions be integrated?
Choice: Should sport be grouped by ability or disability?

  • I believe that the separation of sport as a fair competition on abilities and disabilities. However, the separation also contains risk for both abilities and disabilities. I think that more opportunities should be present in a sports league for both athletes with disability and non-disabled athletes.

 

 

Part Two: Making Connections

A) Gender, Sport and Disability

Exercise 8: Complete the Activity

The paradox that sportswomen habitually face (as the authors observe, this isn’t confined to disabled sportswomen) involves the expectation they will be successful in a ‘masculine’ environment while complying with femininity norms in order to be recognized as a woman.

True or false? 

Take a moment to reflect on this paradox below (optional).

False

B) Masculinity, Disability, and Murderball

Exercise 9: Notebook/Padlet Prompt

Watch the film, Murderball and respond to the question in the padlet below (you will have an opportunity to return to the film at the end of this module).

The authors of “Cripping Sport and Physical Activity: An Intersectional Approach to Gender and Disability” observe that the “gendered performance of the wheelchair rugby players can…be interpreted as a form of resistance to marginalized masculinity” (332) but also point out that it may reinforce “ableist norms of masculinity.” After viewing the film, which argument do you agree with?

a) Murderball celebrates a kind of resistance to marginalized masculinity

b) Murderball reinforces ableist norms of masculinity
c) Murderball does neither of these things
d) Murderball does both of these things
Explain why in your notebook:
  • The movies display an aggression and competitiveness which align with the traditional  masculine trait. However, the film also highlights men with disabilities taking control of their identity and meaning to be an athlete. Murderball reinforces the ableist norms of masculinity but challenges marginalization

 

Section Three: Taking a Shot

A) Resistance

B) Calling out Supercrip

Exercise 10: Mini Assignment (worth 5% in addition to the module grade)

1) Do you agree with the critique of the “supercrip” narrative in this video? Why or why not? Find an example of the “supercrip” Paralympian in the 2024 Paris Paralympics or Special Olympics coverage and explain how it works. 

In my opinion, the critique of the supercrip narrative is valid due to its portrayed disabled athletes as inspiration rather than their skill in the sport field. The athlete may appreciate the praise from the audience as inspiration  in their field. However, it is so repetitive and irritating for athletes to be seen as inspiration more than talented players. All they desired was for the audience to view them as the worthy player in their field of sport.  An example includes the 2024 Paris Paralympics when the media coverage only focused on the player’s disability rather than their actual talent. The framing suggests that their achievements are exceptional due to their disability. The disabilities was more recognized than their work as the elite competitors.

 

2) Does the film Murderball play into the supercrip narrative in your opinion? How does gender inform supercrip  (read this blog for some ideas)?

(300 words for each response)

The Murderball play is a film that both challenges the reinforcement and the supercrip narrative. The film shows the athletes as very strong and competitive players in the sport field. They fight against the stereotype of a disabled people as weak.  Disabilities do prevent their abilities to be great in the field of sport. The athletes are always shown to be superior in every part of the sport. It is the over message of the Murderball play film. However, the film also focuses on their struggles as people with disabilities in a way that reinforces the idea of playing sport to overcome their disabilities. Gender plays a huge role in the field of sport.  The athletes still embody the characteristics of traditional masculinity in the sports field. These characteristics of masculinity include independent, strong, aggressive, dominant, emotionless and leadership. However, there is no meaning of  masculinity for athletes with disabilities.

 

 

License

Icon for the Public Domain license

This work (Gender, Sport, and Social Justice by Kelly McGuire) is free of known copyright restrictions.