"

Student Code of Conduct Adjudication Process

Moreover, the Student Code of Conduct office undertakes a comprehensive review of cases involving alleged violations of policy A130: Student Code of Conduct. Based on the information gathered from the Investigation Case Report and any additional investigative information provided, the Student Code of Conduct office evaluates impartially whether the Respondent is responsible for the alleged violation. This decision is made on a balance of probabilities, where the evidence suggests it is more likely than not that the violation occurred.

Additionally, students under the adjudication process can continue their academic studies unless subject to an Investigative Suspension Order, which can restrict some privileges, as explained above. The College prohibits reprisals against individuals who utilize the policy or participate in proceedings in good faith, with violators subject to disciplinary action.


Notification of Allegations

Upon receipt of an Investigation Case Report from Campus Security Services, within 5 College business days, the Code of Conduct office notifies the respondent via email through an official “Code of Conduct Major Case: Notification Letter,” which provides a summary of the allegations. The Respondent is allowed to respond in writing or at a meeting (virtual or in person) with the Student Code of Conduct office. During this stage, informal resolution is encouraged. If the Respondent fails to provide a response or attend a meeting with the Student Code of Conduct office after being given a reasonable opportunity, then the Student Code of Conduct office may proceed to adjudicate the complaint without their input with the information currently available.


Decision

Before taking a final decision, the Student Code of Conduct office can consult with other College and academic areas to seek clarifications and/or additional information (such as the Complainant, Residency, Athletics, Counselling, etc.), always adhering to the principles of fairness and privacy outlined in the Data Privacy Act and Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA). During the decision process, the Student Code of Conduct office takes into account various factors such as the severity of the behaviour(s), its impact on the College community, any prior violations of the Student Code or other College policies, acts of good faith and collaboration during the process, and academic standing and progression of the student(s) involved. In addition, it ensures principles of natural justice and fairness are applied, taking in restorative and learning sanctions as much as possible. It is important to clarify that the decision is always made based on the “Balance of Probabilities Theory”:

Balance of Probabilities. Image by Freddy Vale, CC BY-SA 4.0

This means, after a thorough review of all the documents and information provided by all parties, the Respondent will be deemed responsible if the complaint is concluded to be ‘more probable’ or ‘more likely’ of happening than not by the Student Code of Conduct office. In this case, the Student Code of Conduct office will determine an appropriate sanction and communicate its decision, along with brief reasons, to the Respondent by email through a “Major Case: Decision Letter” with a “Conduct Report,” which is a document that summarizes the Major Case process from the beginning until its end.

If the Respondent is found not responsible, then the Student Code of Conduct office determines the next steps.

It is important to clarify that even though justice courts use the “Balance of Probabilities Theory,” the College does not adjudicate the Student Code of Conduct on a legal basis, and this process is neither criminal nor civil, only academic and administrative in nature.

In case an Investigative Suspension Order takes place, the Student Code of Conduct office also facilitates necessary accommodations with college departments for the student to return and make up missed assignments and exams in its decision outcome.

In cases involving sexual violence and sexual assault, the Student Code of Conduct office will also inform the Complainant of the results of its decision in writing, which will include a brief description of the outcome or any corrective action that the College has taken or will take as a result of its investigation and adjudication processes. This summary will always respect the Respondent’s personal information, adhering to the principles of fairness and privacy outlined in the Data Privacy Act and Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA).

If the Respondent lives in residence and/or is a member of College Athletics, independently from what the Student Code of Conduct office might adjudicate, those entities can also apply sanctions at their own discretion based on their own Code of Conduct policies. However, in those situations, their offices will consider the Student Code of Conduct’s decision so as not to double-sanction the student.

For effective communication, Respondents and Complainants will primarily be contacted via email, using the information available in the College records and Fanshawe email. Upholding confidentiality is a priority throughout the process, striking a balance between conducting a thorough investigation and adhering to legal requirements, including those outlined in the Data Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA). All parties and witnesses are urged to maintain confidentiality regarding the information discussed, and any unwarranted breaches may result in disciplinary action.


Disciplinary Sanctions

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Student Rights and Responsibilities Copyright © 2025 by Fanshawe College is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.