8.6 Chapter Summary
Measuring Election Performance
After reviewing the material in this chapter, it might seem impossible to devise a truly meaningful measurement of electoral effectiveness. The Election Data Science Lab team at MIT attempted to do just that for American elections. The team compiled an index to compare and rank the performance of elections within each state. The Elections Performance Index combines twenty different measures of turnout, ease of registration, ballot processing, and wait times to give a comprehensive measure of election performance. Take a look through the index and consider the following questions:
- Which states scored the highest?
- Which states scored the lowest?
- What do you think of the criteria that was used?
Chapter Summary
In this chapter,
- Elections aim to balance responsiveness, representativeness, and citizen satisfaction, but different systems produce different outcomes in these areas.
- Plurality and majority systems often lead to single-party governments that pass laws efficiently, while proportional systems create coalition governments that may be slower but more inclusive.
- Responsiveness is measured by how closely government policies align with public opinion; both proportional and plurality systems can be responsive, but in different ways.
- Representativeness includes proportionality (vote share vs. seat share) and descriptive representation (e.g. gender or demographic diversity); proportional systems usually perform better.
- Disproportional election results, such as those in Ontario’s 2025 provincial election, show how plurality systems can distort voter preferences and reduce satisfaction.
- Proportional representation tends to increase the number of women elected, especially when combined with tools like gender quotas and zipper-style party lists.
- Voter turnout is influenced by both personal factors (like age and education) and systemic factors (like electoral design and compulsory voting laws); proportional systems often see higher turnout.
- Citizen satisfaction is higher when elections are perceived as fair and inclusive; proportional systems help narrow the satisfaction gap between winners and losers.
OpenAI. (2025, June 24th). ChatGPT. [Large language model]. https://www.chatgpt.com Prompt: Can you please summarize the passage into 8 key points with no additional bullets. Edited & Reviewed by author.
Key Terms
- Descriptive Representation – A form of representation where elected officials physically or demographically resemble the constituents they represent, such as in gender, race, age, or socioeconomic background.
- District Magnitude – The number of representatives elected from a single electoral district. Higher district magnitudes can allow for greater diversity among elected officials and often benefit smaller or underrepresented parties.
- Effective Number of Parties in Parliament (ENPP) – A statistical measure that reflects how many political parties effectively hold power in a legislature, accounting for both the number of parties and their relative sizes. A higher ENPP indicates a more fragmented or pluralistic parliament.
- Proportionality – A measure of how closely the percentage of votes a party receives aligns with the percentage of seats it gains in the legislature. A system is proportionate if vote share and seat share are nearly equal.
- Representativeness – The extent to which the elected government mirrors the makeup and preferences of the population. This includes political (partisan) alignment and demographic or social representation (e.g., gender, ethnicity).
- Responsiveness – The degree to which a government enacts laws and implements policies that align with the preferences of its citizens. A responsive government reflects public opinion in its decisions.
- Voter Turnout Rate- The proportion of eligible or registered voters who actually cast a vote in an election. It is commonly used as an indicator of public engagement, trust in the system, or satisfaction with the democratic process.
- Winner-Loser Gap – The difference in satisfaction with the electoral process between voters whose preferred party or candidate won versus those whose preferred option lost. A smaller gap is associated with higher perceived electoral fairness.
- Zipper System – A gender-balancing technique used in party lists under proportional representation systems, where male and female candidates are alternated (e.g., woman-man-woman-man) to ensure more equitable representation.