References

Beeghley, L., & Butler, E. W. (1974). The Consequences of Intelligence Testing in the Public Schools before and after Desegregation. Social Problems, 21(5), 740–754.

https://doi.org/10.2307/799646

Ebe, A. E. (2010) “Culturally relevant texts and reading assessment for English language learners.” Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts 50(3), 5.

Garside, J., Nhemachena, J. Z., Williams, J., & Topping, A. (2009). Repositioning assessment: Giving students the ‘choice’ of assessment methods. Nurse Education in Practice, 9(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2008.09.003

Houts, P. L. (1976). Behind the Call for Test Reform and Abolition of the IQ. The Phi Delta Kappan, 57(10), 669–673. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20298432

Hounsell, D. (2007) Integrative assessment. Blending assignments and assessments for high-quality learning. Guide number 3. Mansfield: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

Kohn, A. (2011). The case against grades. Educational Leadership69(3), 28-33.

Kellaghan, T., & Greaney, V. (2019). Public examinations examined. World Bank Publications.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2021). I’m here for the hard re-set: Post pandemic pedagogy to preserve our culture. Equity & Excellence in Education54(1), 68-78.

Milsom. (2021). Assessing and Transgressing: On the Racist Origins of Academic

Standardization. Nineteenth-Century Gender Studies17(1).

Mogey, N., Purcell, M., Paterson, J. S., & Burk, J. (2019). Handwriting or typing exams—Can we give students the choice? In F. Khandia (Ed.), 12th CAA International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference: Proceedings of the conference on 8th and 9th July 2008 at Loughborough University (pp. 221–238). Loughborough University. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/5555

O’Neill, G. (Ed.). (2011). A practitioner’s guide to choice of assessment methods within a module. University College Dublin Teaching and Learning. https://www.ucd.ie/teaching/t4media/choice_of_assessment.pdf

O’Neill, G. (2017). It’s not fair! Students and staff views on the equity of the procedures and outcomes of students’ choice of assessment methods. Irish Educational Studies, 36(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2017.1324805

Snow, K., Miller, T., & O’Gorman, M. (2021). Strategies for culturally responsive assessment adopted by educators in Inuit Nunangat. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education15(1), 61-76.

Stančić, M. (2021). Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: A look inside the black box. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 852–864. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.purdue.edu/10.1080/02602938.2020.1828267

Stommel, J. (2018, March 11). How to ungrade. https://www.jessestommel.com/how-to-ungrade/

Taylor, K. L. (2022). The pandemic and pedagogy experimentation: The benefits of ungrading. In J. S. Lantis (Ed.), Active learning in political science for a post-pandemic world (pp. 79–93). Palgrave Macmillan.

Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., & Herrera-Seda, C. (2018). Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 840–854.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

DEDI in Teaching & Learning Copyright © 2023 by York's CoP for DEDI in Teaching and Learning is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book