4.3 Questioning and Revising Assumptions in Academic Writing
Once identified, assumptions should be evaluated and revised if necessary to ensure a critical line of reasoning.
Techniques for Revision
Add Qualifiers
- Instead of making absolute claims (“X causes Y”), introduce nuance: “X may contribute to Y under specific conditions.”
Integrate Counterexamples
- When you include exceptions, you demonstrate intellectual honesty and depth.
Practice Reflexivity
- When you are the writer, acknowledge your own position and potential bias as the author. This transparency strengthens trust and integrity.
Reframe the Question at Issue
- Shift the perspective. Ask how alternate assumptions might generate different interpretations or conclusions.
Sample Revision Example
Original:
“Remote work reduces productivity.”
Revised:
“While some argue that remote work may impede productivity due to isolation or distractions, others highlight increased autonomy, flexibility, and well-being. The relationship between remote work and productivity is likely context-dependent, influenced by individual work styles and organizational support structures.”
This revision demonstrates critical engagement, recognizes multiple perspectives, and avoids over-simplified conclusions.
