"

2 Step into the shoes of professionals

Dan Connolly

Overview

This innovative assessment method forms a core part of the curriculum in the BSc (Hons.) Top-Up Degree in Physical Activity, Health, and Exercise, specifically within the module titled “Special Populations and Physical Activity”. This assessment requires students to step into the shoes of professionals by delivering formal seminars to an audience comprising their peers and industry experts. Students may elect to work individually or in small groups and have an allocated time limit of 20 minutes per number of students in the assessment group. The essence of these seminars lies in their focus on designing tailored physical activity interventions for various special population groups while also delving into the contemporary issues these groups face. Such a method not only simulates a real-world professional setting but also poses an alternative to traditional assessment techniques by offering an authentic, practical learning experience. Implementing this method involved several stages, beginning with the careful selection of topics that align with the pressing needs and challenges of special populations in the context of physical activity and health. Students were then tasked with conducting detailed research, culminating in the development of innovative, evidence-based intervention plans. This comprehensive preparation phase ensured that the seminars delivered were not only informative but also grounded in the latest research and best practices in the field of physical activity and health for special populations. The seminars themselves were designed to be interactive, engaging, and reflective of the students’ understanding and creativity. By presenting in front of industry experts, students had the unique opportunity to receive real-time, constructive feedback, further enriching their learning experience. The environment of these seminars was prepared to mimic professional conferences, complete with Q&A sessions, thereby offering students a taste of professional discourse and networking within their field of study. Objective: The primary objectives of employing the Professional Seminars as an assessment method were multifaceted. Firstly, the method aimed to evaluate students’ ability to critically analyse and understand the contemporary issues facing special population groups in the context of physical activity and health. This involves not just a theoretical understanding but also a practical application of knowledge to design case study interventions that are both innovative and feasible. Moreover, the assessment sought to probe students’ ability to integrate and apply current policies, strategies, and interventions tailored to the needs of specific population groups. Such a deep dive not only tested students’ research skills but also their capacity to think critically and come up with solutions that could potentially be implemented in real-world scenarios. Lastly, the Professional Seminars aimed to significantly enhance student engagement, improve overall attainment levels, and facilitate the development of a wide array of skills relevant to graduate employability. These skills include, but are not limited to, public speaking, critical thinking, research methodology, and the ability to effectively communicate complex ideas. Through this innovative assessment method, students were not only assessed on their academic prowess but also on their readiness to enter the professional world, making the learning experience both comprehensive and impactful.

Grading

The grading criteria for the professional seminars revolve around content, delivery, and seminar resources. For content, students must thoroughly address the physical activity needs of their chosen special population, demonstrate a deep understanding of the relevant contemporary issues, and propose well-informed physical activity interventions. Their preparation and research should be evident, with all references following APA style, and they should capably answer audience questions. Delivery focuses on clear and effective verbal and non-verbal communication, maintaining professionalism (including attire), managing time well, and engaging the audience throughout. Lastly, seminar resources provided to the audience must be professional, informative, and meticulously prepared, with perfect spelling, grammar, and appropriate language. These criteria ensure students not only master the subject matter but also excel in presenting it in a professional and engaging manner, preparing them for real-world scenarios. The full assessment rubric is also provided in the attachment section.

Lessons Learned

Successful Aspects: The method led to high levels of student satisfaction and significant increases in mean module attainment compared to traditional methods. Prior to the introduction of this assessment, the mean module mark at this level of the programme was 55. The first four years of implementing the module saw module means of 72, 77, 62 and 70 respectively. Moreover, the assessment provided students with opportunities to work with real-world issues which fostered a deeper engagement with the content. Areas for Improvement: Based upon experience, the module could have been improved by using digital technologies (such as Microsoft Teams or Zoom) to offer the potential for a more industry experts to access the seminars remotely. This would have also tested students’ digital skills which are important for graduate careers. Recommendations: Future implementations should continue to emphasise real-world relevance and professional engagement. Encouraging peer and external expert feedback can further enrich the learning experience, and use of digital conferences may also develop students’ wider digital skills. General Advice: Engaging students in active roles and diversifying assessment methods can significantly enhance learning outcomes and student satisfaction. Incorporating industry perspectives and allowing students to choose topics can increase relevance and motivation for study.

Resources

You can consult this link with resources related to this assessment: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Bj8sB8TWJNMxOw8_QOmGLf8JmxWUhcUy

 

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Handbook of Alternative Assessments Copyright © by Eliana Elkhoury, PhD; Amber Hoye; Blessing Maregere; Dan Connolly; Dr Andrew G D Holmes; Dr Maryam Jaffar Ismail; Dr. Kavita Rani; Nicole Patrie; and TANNISTHA DASGUPTA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.