Mis/Dis/Mal-information
22 About Mis/Dis/Mal-information
What are These Terms?
Misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation are different terms defined by the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, but ultimately, they all have a purpose to discredit “valid information”.
What Does This Look Like?
There are many ways that mis-, dis-, and mal-information can spread to perpetuate epistemic injustice, such as:
- Manipulating online media to serve an out of context perspective, generate a negative emotional response, or exploit pre-existing fears and concerns (e.g. clickbait titles)
- Influence or change subject headings and controlled vocabulary in databases (e.g. choosing inappropriate subject headings for a topic or community)
- Feed and relay AI-generated information or knowledge (e.g. deepfakes)
- Misusing and/or falsifying authority on a subject matter (e.g. no healthcare experts on health topics)
- Violate academic integrity and ethical standards (e.g. falsified data, malicious use of data, unverified claims of research results)
- Misrepresent reputable journals and their editorial processes (e.g. predatory publishing)
Some instances may be born from social media posts where information escalates beyond control. Even in academia, misinformation can be prolific and cited amongst experts in the field. No one is immune to falling for misinformation, which is why we have a responsibility, both social and professional, to confront it when we see it.
Caption: “Why it’s so easy to fall for fake news and how to spot it” from CBC News (2019)
How to Combat Mis/Dis/Mal-information?
For Yourself
First of all, slow down!
Strong critical-thinking and evaluation skills will help you recognize and avoid harmful claims so you can receive and use the most accurate, reliable, and thoughtful information for your research. Time and space to deliberate over the information you are reading is critical and emphasizes the need for a generous timeline to conduct a good source evaluation process.
In this guide from Purdue, you can see a variety of logical fallacies that may be embedded into content you see online. One example we can look at in this skit video below is a political satire about a red herring fallacy.
When it’s put into a skit above, it seems pretty easy to identify a logical fallacy!
However, you were just scrolling over a bandwagon statement on TikTok such as “Pilates is all the rage for having a hot-girl summer” or a hasty generalization like “eating high-protein meals is the only way to keep full and lose weight”, those are things much harder to spot in the moment.
It can even happen in a real-life disagreements where someone repeating misinformation may say, in response to your fact-checking, you are “attacking them or accusing them of lying” (or, a straw man argument!).
Systems of oppression are the frameworks of which mis/dis/mal-information builds itself on, and our positionality and/or privilege can influence how we both interpret and respond to information, whether it is fact or fiction.
Because of this, we may all carry implicit bias to some degree, and that can affect how we engage with the world and the information we see. Implicit means here that we hold these biases without entirely recognizing it’s there; this will look different than the usual explicit bias that you see in real life and is much harder to spot. You can take a look at these quizzes to learn more about what implicit bias you may carry without realizing!
Again, part of Western Libraries’ curriculum is to establish critical reflection and evaluation techniques for all users that come to us so they can research and relay knowledge responsibly. Using robust techniques that incorporate a Knowledge Justice-lens will be incredibly helpful for you to both look inward and engage with all types of information!
How to Spot Fake News (IFLA):
Some other quick tricks taken from the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) you can do while browsing information include:

- Consider the Source: click away from the story to investigate the site, its mission and its contact info.
- Read Beyond: headlines can be outrageous in an effort to get clicks. What’s the whole story?
- Check the Author: do a quick search on the author. Are they credible? Are they real?
- Supporting Sources: click on those links. Determine if the info given actually supports the story.
- Check the Date: reposting old news stories doesn’t mean they’re relevant to current events.
- Is it a Joke: if it is too outlandish, it might be satire. Research the site and author to be sure.
- Check your Biases: consider if your own beliefs could affect your judgment.
- Ask the Experts: ask a librarian or consult a fact-checking site.
For Others
It might be upsetting to know others, whether you are close to them personally or even online, believing and perpetuating mis/dis/mal-information.
Some steps[1] to keep in mind when you or someone you know might be encountering mis/dis/mal-information include:
- Consider using the term “rumor” or “misleading content” instead of misinformation. This can help mitigate triggered reactions and be clear on still wanting to have an established and safe conversation.
- Take some time to understand why this misleading content resonates with your loved one. People’s social identities and lived experiences influence the way the world treats them, how they perceive themselves, and how they interact with others. This is the framework they approach information with, and it might help unpack some of this when you are discussing why they feel strongly about “untrustworthy” knowledge.
- Talk about your sources and discuss why you find them trustworthy. It might not work in all cases, as relationships or family dynamics are varied and complex, but practicing “due weight” by proportionally focusing content with higher amounts of quality sources may help.
- Recognize that you are not trying to change people’s core beliefs, just addressing misleading information. This may be hard, but think of it as trying to build a safe and continuous conversation. It’s unlikely you will convince someone to change their mind quickly, and disapproving their entire worldview or lived experience (if any) can lead to them shutting down. Try bits of misinformation that can be debunked instead of broad general accusations.
- Provide a detailed fact-check when debunking claims. Instead of keeping claims brief, it may be more effective in detailing pathways on why and how your fact-checking is correct. Try even using more than one instance to help compare or contrast!
- Manage expectations on how these conversations may go. It may not happen today, or tomorrow, and maybe never, but navigating relationships in the face of misinformation is a slow and evolving process, so find a balance between these conversations and peace!
Want to try out your skills in spotting manipulative techniques with information? Try this “prebunking” guide from Jigsaw (Google) to see how well you can ID these tactics!
Check out our next chapter in the different resources that are available to help you whenever you engage with potential mis/dis/mal-information.
Media Attributions
- How To Spot Fake News from IFLA © ILFA is licensed under a CC BY-NC-SA (Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike) license
- Nguyen, Audrey, Briony Swire-Thompson, Sarah Nguyễn , and Rachel Kup. To combat misinformation, start with connection, not correction, September 30, 2024. https://www.npr.org/2024/09/30/g-s1-24711/to-combat-misinformation-start-with-connection-not-correction. ↵